Contact Me By Email

Contact Me By Email

Showing posts with label Al Gore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Al Gore. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 08, 2011

Keith Olbermann Heads to Al Gore's Current TV | Fancast News

Cropped headshot of Keith OlbermannImage via WikipediaKeith Olbermann Heads to Al Gore's Current TV | Fancast News

Keith Olbermann is set to join Current TV, the cable channel founded by former Vice President Al Gore.

Olbermann, who’s been out of the public eye since his abrupt departure from MSNBC last month, announced Tuesday that he’s headed to Current, where he’ll host a new talk show starting in late spring. He’ll have the newly created title of “chief news officer” for Current and will also have an “equity stake” in the cable channel, according to Entertainment Weekly.

Current was launched in 2005 by Gore and business partner Joel Hyatt. The channel, available in 60 million homes, is best-known as a repository of viewer-generated content –- video produced mainly by the young people who comprise the channel’s target audience. Hiring Olbermann represents the first time the channel has reached out to sign a nationally known TV personality for a nightly talk show. The move indicates a shift in Current’s programming strategy.

“In Current Media, Al Gore and Joel Hyatt have created the model truth-seeking entity,” Olbermann enthused in a telephone news conference late Tuesday morning. He declined to criticize MSNBC or any of his other former employers, but he did say that “Current is not only the leading independent network, it’s the only one.”

Reports of the former MSNBC host’s next career move began to circulate Monday evening, in advance of Tuesday’s news conference.

A story in the New York Times speculated that Olbermann’s deal with Current had been in the works for a while and may have precipitated his sudden break with MSNBC last month.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Joe Lieberman's approach out of step with the times - Charles Mahtesian - POLITICO.com

Joe Lieberman's approach out of step with the times - Charles Mahtesian - POLITICO.com

By the geriatric standards of the Senate, the retirement of 68-year-old Sen. Joe Lieberman comes at a relatively young age. But Wednesday’s news that the Connecticut Democrat plans to leave the stage in 2012 surprised no one: It was clear the role he played was outdated and even clearer that he was thoroughly unsuited for the modern political era.

The circumstances surrounding Lieberman’s decision not to seek reelection attest to that. In the span of just a decade, he went from celebrated vice-presidential nominee—he was the first Jewish candidate on a major party ticket in American history—to near-pariah status within his own party.

The speed and arc of his political decline is stunning: In 2000, Lieberman won reelection to a third Senate term in a landslide, even as he spent the bulk of his time campaigning outside his home state as Al Gore’s running mate. By 2006, Lieberman couldn’t even win the Democratic nomination for his own seat. He was forced to run as a third-party candidate, winning with a bare 50 percent of the vote.

The pendulum swung so far for Lieberman that he got a serious look to be Republican Sen. John McCain’s running mate in 2008. Both Gore and McCain saw in Lieberman the same thing, in mirror image: a moderate-to-conservative grown-up, whose very presence would signal to voters that the man at the top of the ticket wasn’t as extreme as he might appear at first blush, either to the left or to the right.

But these days, at a time when most politicians prefer to pledge devotion to bipartisanship while not actually practicing it, a man with a foot in two parties really has no party. And therefore, really, no political future.

The first hint of the troubles to come for Lieberman surfaced in 2004, when he embarked on his own presidential campaign—a bid that never got off the ground. The senator had gone old school, waiting for Gore to make a decision before announcing his intention to run. But Gore himself didn’t show him the same courtesy, abandoning Lieberman, with no notice, for Howard Dean.

For Lieberman, a run for a fifth term in 2012 would have been marked by great uncertainty, beginning with the most simple question of all—under which party label would he, or could he, run?

Part of the problem Lieberman faced was stylistic. He was politician built for radio, not cable television. He was not the kind of public figure who could be asked if he wore boxers or briefs, or counted on to make incendiary remarks. The sobriety and civility that marked his approach belonged to another era, as did the issues on which he first gained national notice: violent movies, video games and gangsta rap.

Likewise, his ideology proved out of sync with the times. He rated as the most conservative Senate Democrat in a region that serves as a liberal citadel, a hawkish centrist in a party where the energy is on the left and the path back to power was paved by resistance to two overseas wars.

The Connecticut senator alluded to his estrangement from his party in his remarks Wednesday announcing his retirement.

“I have not always fit comfortably into conventional political boxes—maybe you’ve noticed that — Democrat or Republican, liberal or conservative,” he said in his hometown of Stamford. “I have always thought that my first responsibility is not to serve a political party but to serve my constituents, my state, and my country, and then to work across party lines to make sure good things get done for them.”

Lieberman also sought to highlight that it was the political environment that had changed, not his own beliefs.

“The politics of President Kennedy—service to country, support of civil rights and social justice, pro-growth economic and tax policies, and a strong national defense—are still my politics, and they don’t fit neatly into today’s partisan political boxes anymore either,” he said.

None of that stopped Lieberman from evolving into a key player in the Senate. Even as his political fortunes waned back home, he remained as important as ever in Washington. He played a prominent role in homeland and national security issues in the post-9/11 era and emerged as an important voice in support of President George W. Bush on the use of force in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Yet it was that role that nearly led to his defeat in 2006 and irrevocably damaged his relationship with the Democratic base. Bush’s embrace of Lieberman after delivering his State of the Union speech in 2005—known to the senator’s growing legion of detractors as “the kiss”—affixed to Lieberman like a scarlet letter. A year and a half later, Lieberman was denied renomination by wealthy businessman Ned Lamont.

While some of his Democratic Senate colleagues supported him in his third-party bid that fall, many in the party did not. His longtime delegation partner, Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd, endorsed Lamont, even going so far as to cut an ad for him.

While Lieberman was cautiously welcomed back into the caucus after his victory in November 2006 and claimed the chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, it wasn’t necessarily because all was forgiven—his vote served to put Democrats into the majority in an almost evenly divided chamber.

In any case, it wasn’t long until Lieberman’s relationship with his party could be declared irreparably broken. He attended McCain’s 2008 Republican National Convention and drew serious consideration for the ticket. At the time, Lieberman was viewed as a transformative pick that would disassociate McCain from Bush and the damaged GOP brand — just as he had been picked eight years earlier to distance Gore from the legacy of Bill Clinton.

McCain decided instead to tap Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, a very different model of transformative running mate and one much better suited to the demands of contemporary politics.

After his dalliance with the GOP, Lieberman’s political options back home diminished even further. By the fall of 2010, his support in the polls was at rock bottom levels. His only path to reelection appeared to be on the GOP line, but even that would be a dicey endeavor since his approval ratings with Republicans were below 50 percent.

That left Lieberman in a remarkably similar position to the man he ousted to win the seat in 1988—former GOP Sen. Lowell Weicker. At the time, Weicker was also buffeted by tectonic political forces that made him one of an endangered species—the Northeastern Republican. He had thumbed his nose at conservatives, staked out a lonely position on the left flank of a party that was breaking to the right and emphasized his independence with a slogan that read, “Nobody’s man but yours.”

Given the choice of running a similar campaign or moving on to the next phase of his life, Lieberman wisely chose the latter. He already knew how the movie ended.

Sunday, January 09, 2011

Palin aide: 'Never intended gun sights' - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

Palin aide: 'Never intended gun sights' - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

An aide to Sarah Palin said images of cross-hairs were never meant to evoke violence, in the Palin camp's first extended comment on yesterday's attack.

" We have nothing whatsoever to do with this," Palin aide. Rebecca Mansour told the talk radio host Tammy Bruce in an interview. "We never ever, ever intended it to be gun sights. It was simply cross-hairs like you'd see on maps," she said, suggesting that it is a "surveyor's symbol."

There is "nothing irresponsible about our graphic," she said.

She called attempts to link Palin to the violence "obscene" and "appalling," and said she was "disgusted" with the politicization.

"We can't ban the words 'targeted swing districts' from the English language," she said. "We did nothing wrong here."

"I don't understand how anybody could be held responsible for somebody who is completely mentally unstable like this. Where I come from the person that is actually shooting is the one that's culpable," Mansour said, speculating that the shooter is a paranoid schizophrenic. "It seems that the people that knew him said that he was left-wing and very liberal -- but that is not to say that I am blaming the left."

"I never went out and blamed Al Gore or any environmentalist for the crazy insane person who went to shoot up the Discovery Channel," she said.

Mansour recalled that her father was shot and badly wounded by drug addicts when she was a child in Detroit, and cited his model of forgiveness and avoiding politicization and blame. Her father, then the Assistant Dean of the Business School at the University of Detroit, was shot in July 1984, she said this morning.

The interview was first reported by the Alaska Dispatch.

UPDATE: The images on the map do bear a resemblance to a surveyor's symbol, but Palin herself referred to it as a "'bullseye' icon" immediately after the election.

Friday, January 07, 2011

Why Obama Chose Businessman William Daley as His Chief of Staff

Why Obama Chose Businessman William Daley as His Chief of Staff

President Obama picked former Commerce Secretary William Daley to be his new chief of staff on Thursday, bringing on board a businessman with vast political experience at a time Obama is preparing to launch his re-election bid and improve relations with the corporate community.

Though the president and Daley have known each for years from Chicago politics, Obama's quick rise from the Illinois State Senate to the White House had little to do with Daley or his brother, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley. Daley has never been part of Obama's inner personal circle -- considered a plus because he can bring an outsider's perspective to the White House.

What Obama and Daley -- and former Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel -- have in common are close ties to Obama Senior Adviser David Axelrod, who is expected to depart at the end of the month to return to Chicago and take on duties as the main strategist for the 2012 Obama campaign.

Daley is stylistically different from Emanuel, far more measured than the harder-edged Emanuel, whose early political job was as a fundraiser for Richard Daley's 1989 mayoral campaign. The vacancy Daley is filling was created when Emanuel quit in October to run for Chicago mayor, getting in the race once Mayor Daley decided not to seek another term.

In selecting William Daley, White House officials told Politics Daily, Obama gets a very specific skill set needed as he prepares to launch his re-election bid and deal with a potentially hostile GOP-controlled House and a Senate where Democratic strength has diminished.

Daley, who is expected to join the administration in a few weeks, brings in deep links to the global business world, Cabinet experience, national political knowledge and a comfort factor stemming not only from connections to Axelrod but also to David Plouffe, Obama's 2008 campaign manager who is joining the White House on Monday.

Since May 2004, Daley has been working from Chicago as the Midwest chairman banking giant JP Morgan Chase & Co. and head of its corporate responsibility operation. Daley's last major political assignment was in 2000, when he was brought in to rescue Vice President Al Gore's presidential campaign, setting up camp in Tallahassee, Fla., during the brutal recount battle against George Bush that was eventually decided by the U.S Supreme Court.

He also was an early backer of Vice President Joe Biden's 1988 presidential bid and a veteran of Walter Mondale's presidential contest.

But Daley is as familiar with Chicago's precinct politics as he is with presidential elections. Though Daley, 62, the mayor's youngest brother, in the last 10 years flirted with runs for Illinois governor and senator, he never jumped in himself.

Obama noted how Daley straddled the government and political worlds when he announced his chief of staff pick Thursday afternoon in the White House East Room, flanked by Daley and interim chief of staff Pete Rouse.

Rouse got high grades for his work, but did not want to stay on as chief. Instead, the super low-profile Rouse, who served Obama as his chief of staff when he was an Illinois senator -- and was an architect of his presidential campaign -- will remain as a counselor to the president.

In speaking about Daley, Obama said, "He's led major corporations. He possesses a deep understanding of how jobs are created . . . And, needless to say, Bill also has a smidgen of awareness of how our system of government and politics works. You might say it is a genetic trait," Obama said, a reference to Daley's brother and father, both Chicago mayors.

Obama cited Daley's "tremendous experience, his strong values and forward-looking vision," adding, "I'm convinced that he'll help us in our mission of growing our economy and moving America forward. And I very much look forward to working with Bill in the years to come."

Daley said it was an "extreme honor" to take on the assignment. Alluding to President John F. Kennedy, always a Daley family favorite, he recalled a visit to the White House decades ago with his family.

"Fifty years ago this month, I visited the White House with my parents and my brothers and sisters to visit a young president who went on to show great strength, leadership and vision in the face of enormous challenges in those times. You, Mr. President, are proving your strength, your leadership, your vision during a most difficult time for our nation and for the world. You have also shown through your example that public service is an honorable calling, and I am pleased to answer your call," Daley said.

Daley's appointment drew mixed reviews: Democratic progressives were disappointed and the business community was very upbeat. Daley frayed relations with unions in 1993, when he was President Clinton's "NAFTA czar," successfully winning congressional approval for the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Clinton later tapped Daley as Commerce secretary in 1997 at the start of his second term and earlier had named him to a seat on the board of Fannie Mae, the quasi-governmental mortgage maker, in part to make up for not making him Transportation secretary in his first term.

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka was wary of Daley. "The president is of course entitled to choose a chief of staff in whom he has complete confidence," Trumka said in a statement. "Yet President Obama and his Administration will ultimately be judged by results -- whether the economy recovers robustly and begins to generate good jobs on the scale needed to improve the lives of working people."

Justin Ruben, executive director of the liberal MoveOn.org, was equally skeptical. "With Wall Street reporting record profits while middle-class Americans continue to struggle in a deep recession, the announcement that William Daley, who has close ties to the Big Banks and Big Business, will now lead the White House staff is troubling and sends the wrong message to the American people," Ruben said in a statement.

Daley's selection drew applause from Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue. "This is a strong appointment," he said in a statement. "Bill Daley is a man of stature and extraordinary experience in government, business, trade negotiations, and global affairs. He's an accomplished manager and strong leader. We look forward to working with him to accelerate our recovery, grow the economy, create jobs, and tackle America's global challenges."

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) was also enthusiastic about the Daley pick. He told reporters on Thursday, "I, frankly, think it's kind of a hopeful sign. He has a business background. You know, we used to -- I used to say the last two years -- I don't know whether it's technically true or not -- but that there was nobody down at the White House who had ever even run a lemonade stand. You know, they were all college professors . . . former elected officials. This is a guy who's actually been out in the private sector, been a part of business. Frankly, my first reaction is: That sounds like a good idea."

Like Emanuel, Daley is a Democratic centrist. In a December Washington Post column taking stock of the big Democratic loss in the November elections, Daley gave liberals some tough love:
"All that is required for the Democratic Party to recover its political footing is to acknowledge that the agenda of the party's most liberal supporters has not won the support of a majority of Americans -- and, based on that recognition, to steer a more moderate course on the key issues of the day, from health care to the economy to the environment to Afghanistan.

"For liberals to accept that inescapable reality is not to concede permanent defeat. Rather, let them take it as a sign that they must continue the hard work of slowly and steadily persuading their fellow citizens to embrace their perspective. In the meantime, liberals -- and, indeed, all of us -- should have the humility to recognize that there is no monopoly on good ideas, as well as the long-term perspective to know that intra-party warfare will only relegate the Democrats to minority status, which would be disastrous for the very constituents they seek to represent," Daley wrote.
Last year, Daley joined the board of a moderate group called the Third Way, whose president, Jonathan Cowan, said in a statement, "His selection sends a clear signal that he intends to govern and campaign from the center over the next two years.

"In selecting Daley, President Obama has hit the trifecta – a top-notch manager, a pro-growth business leader and a moderate Democrat who knows how to work across the aisle."

"Bill Daley is an experienced manager who has run agencies and presidential campaigns," said Cowan. "He has the business credentials to help the White House continue to heal the breach between the administration and the private sector; and he is committed to a big-tent politics for the Democratic Party."

Bill Daley's to-do list - Josh Gerstein and Carol E. Lee - POLITICO.com

Bill Daley's to-do list - Josh Gerstein and Carol E. Lee - POLITICO.com

A change in White House chief of staff often marks the beginning of a new phase in a presidency, and that’s certainly true for Barack Obama. His choice of former Commerce Secretary Bill Daley comes as Obama must confront newly emboldened congressional Republicans and gear up for his own reelection campaign in 2012.

For Daley, it is a daunting task, even for someone born and raised in politics who cut his teeth in a Clinton White House facing a divided Washington. And before he even gets to those long-term problems he has some tasks he will need to confront immediately.

Win over the White House staff

When Daley reports to work for the first time in the West Wing, he will be the lone outsider in a tightknit group that’s already unnerved by the sudden power shift. Many White House staffers worked on Obama’s presidential campaign, were familiar with interim chief of staff Pete Rouse and hardly know Daley, who isn’t close to the president, either.

At the same time, Daley will have a mandate from Obama and possibly a blueprint for staff restructuring from Rouse, who has spent considerable time studying how the White House operates and should function over the next two years. (See: Daley takes Obama back to the future)

Daley will make some changes to the current staff and bring in his own people, sources say, including David Lane, who served as his chief of staff when he was in the Clinton Cabinet.

That’s already stirring anxiety in the West Wing. One White House staffer whose trust Daley will need to gain immediately is Rouse, the president’s senior adviser, who was equivocating over the chief of staff job and then saw Obama choose Daley.

“He’ll want to weigh in on the press secretary decision. He’ll want to look at the structure and the team and have some say about how things get structured,” said one Democrat close to the White House.

Martha Kumar, a Towson University political scientist who studies the operations of the White House, said Daley is the right person for this particular time in the Obama presidency, and the staff will understand that.

“They have enacted a great deal of policy, and now it is time to implement their initiatives. Once the staff realizes Daley has the experiences and relationships to bring about their goals, they will line up with him. He has a broad reach outside the White House and within the communities the president needs to reach. He will bring long-range planning to a White House where it was in short supply.”

But former Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.), whom Rouse consulted several times as he worked on staff restructuring, said Daley needs to worry less about winning over White House staffers than those staffers need to worry about winning over him. (See: Liberals scoff at Daley's new job)

“One of the things I was concerned about was the White House was too insular and too filled with people who’d been involved with the campaign,” Graham said. “They work for him now. Since he’s the boss, they have more the responsibility of selling themselves to him than he does selling Bill Daley to the staff.”

Another major question left unanswered by Daley’s arrival: What becomes of senior adviser and longtime Obama friend Valerie Jarrett? (See: Obama introduces new chief of staff)

Jarrett is not expected to leave the White House, but there’s no avoiding the fact that Daley will, to some extent or another, be taking over her portfolio managing Obama’s relationship with the business community. Many in the business world may welcome that change, but Daley will need to figure out how to rearrange Jarrett’s responsibilities in a way that doesn’t seem like a snub and doesn’t lead to a recurrence of the stories about tensions between Jarrett and the previous chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel.

Calm the liberals

The first reports about the Daley pick provoked an outcry from many liberal groups, who are already angry over being marginalized by Emanuel. Daley will have to spend some time clarifying his views on things like health care reform (he was against the public option) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (he opposed it) as well as his work on the North American Free Trade Agreement during the Clinton administration.

“As a pragmatic person he understands how important the base is to a reelection,” said a Democrat close to the White House. “I think there will be an attempt to shift the dynamic so that it’s more positive.”

Chris Lehane, who worked under Daley when he was chairman of Al Gore’s 2000 presidential campaign, pointed out that it was at Daley’s urging that Gore became a populist candidate. “Remember ‘People, not the powerful?’” Lehane said.

“And at the end of the day, while he knows Wall Street and K Street, he is still a Daley, which means he ‘gets’ Main Street,” added Lehane, who says “Obama is getting a bare-knuckled manager — and by that I mean he is the Bill Belichick of chiefs of staff.”

Daley has already picked up some unexpected and highly influential allies in the liberal camp, including former Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean and former Labor Secretary Robert Reich. Dean and Reich could do a lot to tamp down liberal heartburn over Daley’s appointment.

Make the most of his business background

Obama went out of his way Thursday during his East Room announcement to describe Daley’s business experience. “He’s led major corporations,” the president said. “He possesses a deep understanding of how jobs are created and how to grow our economy. “

What Obama did not mention was the seven years Daley has spent as a top official of JPMorgan Chase. Given the Obama administration’s past antipathy toward the big banks — and the level of public outrage at them — this could prove embarrassing, especially with the inevitable reports on Daley’s compensation. The New York Times got the ball rolling on this line of reporting, when it quoted a person with knowledge of his compensation as saying Daley has made between $3 million and $5 million a year from JPMorgan Chase, while also picking up handsome checks for board service at Boeing, Abbott Laboratories and other companies.

But from the White House’s viewpoint, Daley’s banking ties and his experience in the corporate world are basically just what it’s been looking for in its effort to repair ties with the business community.

“His business background will, I think, be of assistance to the president as he reaches out to that community,” said Graham.

Build a relationship with Obama

Despite their Chicago connection, Obama and Daley are not longtime allies. Daley broke his deep ties with the Clintons to support Obama in the 2008 Democratic primary, but the two men are not particularly close. They operated mostly in separate circles in Chicago politics, although Daley is close to Obama allies Jarrett, Emanuel and outgoing senior adviser David Axelrod.

Before Thursday’s announcement, Obama and Daley spoke several times on the phone about the job. They met in person on Wednesday afternoon in the Oval Office, although Obama didn’t offer Daley the job at the time and only informed his aides of his decision at a 10:30 a.m. staff meeting Thursday, just four hours before his East Room announcement. Part of the reason Obama waited until this week to announce his decision was to get more familiar with Daley.

“They’ll have to figure out what their relationship is going to be, in terms of how they deal with each other,” said a Democrat close to the White House.

Obama and Daley have a bit of a head start because Daley worked on the president’s transition. And Obama paid homage to Daley’s political pedigree in his remarks Thursday, joking about his “smidgen of awareness of how our system of government and politics works.”

“You might say it is a genetic trait,” Obama quipped.

Deal with Congress

Both of Daley’s predecessors, Emanuel and Rouse, worked on Capitol Hill and had close connections with Democrats but not particularly good ones with Republicans. As chief of staff in a White House with a scaled-back legislative agenda, Daley won’t have to interact with Congress as much as his predecessors did, but he’ll still need to mend some fences.

In his previous life in the Clinton administration, Daley’s closest interaction with Congress was when he helped pass the North American Free Trade Agreement. Though that won’t stand him in good stead with many Democrats, who still are unhappy with the deal, it should help him with free-trade Republicans. And in fact, GOP leaders reacted enthusiastically to his selection.

“I, frankly, think it’s kind of a hopeful sign,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). “He has a business background. You know, we used to, I used to say the last two years — I don’t know whether it’s technically true or not — but that there was nobody down at the White House who had ever even run a lemonade stand. You know, they were all college professors … former elected officials. This is a guy who’s actually been out in the private sector, been a part of business.”

And while Daley hasn’t been much seen on Capitol Hill since 2000, he still goes back with many members.

“In his business and political activity, my guess is that Bill knew more than 100 current House Democrats and has maintained contact with them,” said Jim Jaffe, a former spokesman for the late Rep. Dan Rostenkowski of Illinois.

And, Jaffe added, “the very qualities that offend some liberals about him will make it easier for him to get along with [John] Boehner and the Republicans.”

Richard E. Cohen contributed to this report.