Contact Me By Email

Contact Me By Email

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

'Not Earned Your Place As Sec. Of Def.'! Tammy Duckworh DESTROYS Pete He...

White Nationalism, Sexual Assault & Corruption: Trump “Loyalist” Pete Hegseth Faces Senate Confirmation | Democracy Now!


"The confirmation hearing for President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for defense secretary, former Fox News host and military veteran Pete Hegseth, begins today amid backlash over his history of sexual assault, misusing funds in his previous positions, and various violations committed while under the influence of alcohol. Hegseth was also one of 12 National Guard members removed as guards for President Biden’s 2021 inauguration over possible extremist ties. He has tattoos associated with the white supremacist and neo-Nazi movements, including what’s known as a Jerusalem cross, a symbol used by Christian nationalists. If Hegseth is confirmed, “the Trump administration would stand to gain a loyalist,” says reporter Alice Herman, who is covering Hegseth in The Guardian.

AMY GOODMAN: The confirmation hearing for President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, begins today amidst backlash over his history of sexual assault, misusing funds in his previous positions, possible ties to white nationalists, and various violations committed while under the influence of alcohol. The hearing is expected to be contentious, but Democrats do not have the votes in the Senate to kill the nomination.

Two other confirmation hearings set for today were delayed to missing background paperwork: Trump’s pick for veterans affairs secretary, Doug Collins, and interior nominee, Governor Doug Burgum.

Pete Hegseth is a former Fox News host and military veteran. Democrats say the FBI’s background check failed to fully interview key witnesses, including Hegseth’s ex-wife. The New York Times reports she, quote, “made multiple attempts to contact the bureau for a more substantive discussion — but her calls were not returned,” unquote.

The New Yorker's Jane Mayer reports Hegseth's supporters have sought to intimidate potential witnesses from speaking out against him. Mayer also revealed a group of conservative billionaires, including Bill Koch and Richard Uihlein, plan to spend a million dollars to pressure Republican senators to support Hegseth. Jane Mayer previously reportedHegseth was forced out of leadership roles at two veterans groups for misusing funds, sexually harassing women and being repeatedly drunk on the job. In one incident, Hegseth drunkenly chanted “Kill all Muslims! Kill all Muslims!” at a bar in 2015.

Meanwhile, The New York Times reports Hegseth’s own mother once accused him of mistreating women. Hegseth has been a vocal opponent of the Pentagon’s embrace of multiculturalism and the Pentagon’s decision to allow women to serve in combat. He laid out his views on the Shawn Ryan Show in November.

SHAWN RYAN: You don’t like women in combat.

PETE HEGSETH: No.

SHAWN RYAN: Why not?

PETE HEGSETH: I love women service members who contribute amazingly. Because everything about men and women serving together makes the situation more complicated, and complication in combat means casualties are worse. And when you actually go into the hood, again — and I — you know, I’ve gotten response — I’ve gotten 99% positive response to this. A few — a little bit of pushback. But when you actually break down what they did in the studies to open the door for women in combat, I mean, they just ignored them.

AMY GOODMAN: Meanwhile, CBS News reports Hegseth was one of 12 National Guard members removed as guards for President Biden’s 2021 inauguration over possible white nationalist extremist ties. Hegseth has tattoos associated with the white supremacist and neo-Nazi movements, including what’s known as a Jerusalem cross, a symbol used by Christian nationalists.

For more, we’re joined by Alice Herman, politics and democracy reporter for The Guardian. Her piece is headlined “Pete Hegseth, Trump’s Pentagon pick, sparks alarm over far-right extremism.”

Welcome to Democracy Now!, Alice. Why don’t you start off by just laying out what you know about Pete Hegseth, on this first day of his confirmation hearing?

ALICE HERMAN: Thank you so much for having me.

So, shortly after Trump picked Pete Hegseth for his nominee to head the Defense Department, I was hearing from expert sources on far-right extremism that there were things about Hegseth in his kind of public appearances, from the tattoos that he has inked on his body to statements that he’s made in podcasts and on Fox News to the multiple books that he’s published, that kind of raised alarm bells about possible ties to extremist groups or at least on a kind of affiliation or ideological alignment with the far right. And so, my reporting on Hegseth has focused mostly on those sort of public statements that he’s made and the ways that he, you know, presents himself on social media, from the content that he’s putting out there to the things that he’s saying, like I said, on podcasts and on the show that he used to host on Fox News.

What we know is that he really gives the impression of kind of a hypermasculine MAGAcrusader. And he uses the term “crusades” himself, seemingly from a fascination with the Crusades. We know that he has a tattoo sleeve that features at least two tattoos that experts in white nationalism and the far right identified pretty quickly as being symbols that people on the far right, including Neo-Nazi groups, have used themselves. You know, we can get more into some of the things that he’s written in his books, but there’s a lot out there. And I think kind of the point that I want to make here is that in addition to the really great investigative work that has been done looking into accusations of sexual assault by Pete Hegseth to, you know, like you described, allegations of drunkenness at the workplace, he also has this very public kind of persona that will likely be interrogated during his Senate confirmation hearings today.

AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to go back to Pete Hegseth, in his own words, speaking on the Shawn Ryan Show about why he was deemed to be an extremist by the military.

PETE HEGSETH: I was deemed an extremist because of a tattoo by my National Guard unit in Washington, D.C. And my orders were revoked to guard the Biden inauguration. … When I was writing the book, I reached out to somebody in the unit who could confirm with 99.9% certainty, because he was on — in the meetings and on the emails, “Nope, someone inside the D.C. Guard trolled your social media, found a tattoo, used it as an excuse to call you a white nationalist, an extremist, and you were specifically, by name, orders revoked to guard the inauguration, because you are considered a potential threat.”

SHAWN RYAN: How is that? It’s a cross.

PETE HEGSETH: It’s a Christian symbol.

AMY GOODMAN: Your response, Alice Herman?

ALICE HERMAN: Sure. So, the two tattoos that — you know, that researchers and experts and historians kind of pointed to as like a red flag for extremism were the Jerusalem cross tattoo that he has on his chest and the words ”Deus vult” that he has tattooed on his bicep. ”Deus vult” means “God wills it” in Latin, and both are rooted in the Crusades. And both are widely popular among — neither are widely popular among Christians today, but they’re both associated with far-right and Neo-Nazi groups, which have used the symbols.

And so, of course, Hegseth can claim some plausible deniability. Like, not every single person who takes an interest in the Crusades or an interest in one of these symbols is necessarily affiliated with a far-right group. But given the fact that he has both, the scholars and historians that I spoke with felt that that seemed to indicate, at the very least, an alliance or an ideological kind of alignment with white nationalist and Christian nationalist subcultures.

AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to go to the part of the article where you write, “Much of Hegseth’s social media content is promotional. He regularly advertises an ammunition company, a coffee company and the pro-gun group Right to Bear on Instagram.” In November 2023, “he promoted an Advent songbook published by the Forge Press, which is described on its website as an organization that 'arms Christians with weapons to build, defend, and expand the new Christendom'.” Talk more about this.

ALICE HERMAN: Sure. So, yeah, if you look through his — and from what I can tell, he hasn’t — you know, he and his team, whoever’s kind of helping him prepare for this confirmation hearing, hasn’t changed his social media presence, at least from what I can tell. And so, if you look through, like, his Instagram account, you can see that he spends a lot of time advertising for a pro-gun coffee company. He advertises for a company that sells silencers for guns. He advertises, like you mentioned, for — he advertises for a company called the Forge Press, which is a Christian nationalist company that has a podcast, and they also sell merch, you know, things like hats that say “make America Christian again” and things like that. And so, you know, you can always kind of get a sense of the ideological leanings of a content creator based on who they’re platforming and who they’re promoting.

AMY GOODMAN: And his position on women in the military? I mean, he’s going to be before people like Senator Tammy Duckworth, whose legs were blown off in Iraq. You have Elizabeth Warren, who has just written a multipage, what, 33-page report, a sort of case against Hegseth on this issue, women in the military, on his campaign against so-called woke generals, to throw them out of office, you know, clean house.

ALICE HERMAN: Yeah, that’s right. So, in his 2024 book, which is called War on Warriors, he says that the military — well, first, he kind of opens his book with an anecdote, that you described earlier, about the military allegedly not — the Army not calling on him to serve during Biden’s inauguration amid concerns about the tattoos that we had discussed. And then he goes on to, you know, write about how he doesn’t think that the military should be focused on or even engaging in rooting out extremism within the ranks.

And he locates diversity, equity and inclusion principles in the military as a problem. He sees efforts to promote women and people of color and LGBT people in the military as extremely problematic, and he suggests that the promotion of minorities within the ranks is the result of preferential treatment and not merit. And yeah, he speaks this pretty — writes pretty disparagingly about women and LGBT people and people of color in the military in that book. It’s kind of one — it’s one of his central claims.

AMY GOODMAN: You speak with a number of historians who say purging generals constitutes a coup.

ALICE HERMAN: Yeah. In that same book, he proposes purging “woke” — in his words — “woke” generals from the military as a solution to this problem that he identifies or that he claims the military has with embracing, like I said, DEI principles. And it’s true that the historians that I spoke with described that as being tantamount to a coup.

AMY GOODMAN: Finally, what does the military gain by having him at the helm? As one senator pointed out, he hasn’t been in charge of any group larger than 40 people, his platoon. We’re talking about 3 million people in the military.

ALICE HERMAN: I think that — I think that the Trump administration would stand to gain a loyalist. And even in the transition’s own communications, they have emphasized his total alignment with Trump’s vision and loyalty to Trump. So I think that — I think that is what the military stands to gain if he is confirmed.

AMY GOODMAN: Alice Herman, we want to thank you for being with us, politics and democracy reporter for The Guardian. We’ll link to your piece, “Pete Hegseth, Trump’s Pentagon pick, sparks alarm over far-right extremism.” We’ll revisit this hearing tomorrow, after the first day of confirmation hearings today.

Next up, as Gaza ceasefire talks continue, we’ll look at President Joe Biden’s defense of his foreign policy in his major State Department address yesterday. We’ll go to Jerusalem to speak with Matt Duss, former foreign policy adviser for Senator Bernie Sanders. Stay with us.

[break]

AMY GOODMAN: “Sankofa Visions” by Charles M. Murrell III. On Monday, a federal judge ordered the white supremacist group Patriot Front and its leader to pay the musician some $2.8 million for attacking him in Boston in 2022."

White Nationalism, Sexual Assault & Corruption: Trump “Loyalist” Pete Hegseth Faces Senate Confirmation | Democracy Now!

Special Counsel Report Says Trump Would Have Been Convicted in Election Case - The New York Times

Special Counsel Report Says Trump Would Have Been Convicted in Election Case

"The report, which said the special counsel’s office stood “fully behind” the merits of the prosecution, amounted to an extraordinary rebuke of the president-elect.

Donald J. Trump, in a dark suit and burgundy tie, is seen from the side in an ornate gold and white room.
In August 2023, the special counsel Jack Smith charged Donald J. Trump with three intersecting conspiracy counts accusing him of plotting to overturn his loss in the 2020 election.Doug Mills/The New York Times

By Alan Feuer and Charlie Savage

Alan Feuer and Charlie Savage write about legal issues, including the former criminal cases against President-elect Donald J. Trump.

Jack Smith, the special counsel who indicted President-elect Donald J. Trump on charges of illegally seeking to cling to power after losing the 2020 election, said in a final report released early Tuesday that the evidence would have been sufficient to convict Mr. Trump in a trial, had his 2024 election victory not made it impossible for the prosecution to continue.

“The department’s view that the Constitution prohibits the continued indictment and prosecution of a president is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the government’s proof or the merits of the prosecution, which the office stands fully behind,” Mr. Smith wrote.

He continued: “Indeed, but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the presidency, the office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.”

The Justice Department delivered the 137-page volume — representing half of Mr. Smith’s overall final report, with the volume about Mr. Trump’s other federal case, accusing him of mishandling classified documents, still confidential — to Congress just after midnight on Tuesday. 

Thumbnail of page 1

The report amounted to an extraordinary rebuke of a president-elect, capping a momentous legal saga that saw the man now poised to regain the powers of the nation’s highest office charged with crimes that struck at the heart of American democracy. And although Mr. Smith resigned as special counsel late last week, his recounting of the case also served as a reminder of the vast array of evidence and detailed accounting of Mr. Trump’s actions that he had marshaled.

In his report, Mr. Smith took Mr. Trump to task not only for his efforts to reverse the results of a free and fair election, but also for consistently encouraging “violence against his perceived opponents” throughout the chaotic weeks between Election Day and Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol, injuring more than 140 police officers.

Mr. Smith laid the attack on the Capitol squarely at Mr. Trump’s feet, quoting from the evidence in several criminal cases of people charged with taking part in the riot who made clear that they believed they were acting on Mr. Trump’s behalf.

In several lengthy footnotes, Mr. Smith explored the trauma experienced by Capitol Police officers who were attacked during the riot, including “shell-shock” and the inability to move. He quoted one officer who described the effort to keep rioters from getting to congressional staff members inside the Capitol; the officer said that for them, that could have meant “possible death. People are getting killed, maimed.”

Another officer recalled rioters trying to beat up the police “with such ferocity” and wondering: “What are they going to do to somebody else that’s in here, that’s maybe a staff or a congressman or somebody with the press? How are — what are they going to do to them? You know, like, we can take the beating. And I don’t know if these other people can take the beating, too.”

The report’s description of this violence was all the more remarkable given that Mr. Trump has repeatedly vowed to pardon many Jan. 6 defendants, possibly including ones who assaulted police officers on that day.

The report also gave a sense of the scope of Mr. Smith’s inquiry, noting that his team had interviewed more than 250 people and obtained grand jury testimony from more than 55 witnesses. Mr. Smith said the work of the House committee that examined the Capitol attack and predated his investigation was only “a small part of the office’s investigative record.”

The report contained an extensive justification for pursuing the prosecution, given what Mr. Smith called Mr. Trump’s “unprecedented criminal effort to overturn the legitimate results of the election in order to retain power.”

It detailed numerous challenges that the investigation faced, from legal fights over executive privilege and presidential immunity to Mr. Trump’s “ability and willingness to use his influence and following on social media to target witnesses, courts and department employees, which required the office to engage in time-consuming litigation to protect witnesses from threats and harassment.”

One of the most serious obstacles prosecutors faced, Mr. Smith wrote, was that the attempts to hold Mr. Trump accountable both for mishandling classified documents and for trying to subvert the 2020 election took place while he was seeking the White House again.

“Mr. Trump’s announcement of his candidacy for president while two federal criminal investigations were ongoing presented an unprecedented challenge for the Department of Justice and the courts,” Mr. Smith wrote. “Given the timing and circumstances of the special counsel’s appointment and the office’s work, it was unavoidable that the regular processes of the criminal law and the judicial system would run parallel to the election campaign.”

The report contained little information about Mr. Trump’s actions that had not already been made public through his indictment, filed in Federal District Court in Washington in August 2023, or in a lengthy evidentiary memo that Mr. Smith filed in October, part of the fallout from the Supreme Court’s ruling that Mr. Trump enjoyed presumptive immunity for his official acts as president.

While there had been some speculation that Mr. Smith’s report would provide new details about several unindicted co-conspirators described in the indictment — like Jeffrey Clark, a former Justice Department official, and Rudolph W. Giuliani, Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer — the report turned out to say little new about them.

Without naming any particular people, Mr. Smith wrote briefly that his team “had made a preliminary determination that the admissible evidence could justify seeking charges against certain co-conspirators” and had started to evaluate whether any such new case should be joined with Mr. Trump’s or brought separately.

“Because the office reached no final conclusions and did not seek indictments against anyone other than Mr. Trump — the head of the criminal conspiracies and their intended beneficiary — this report does not elaborate further on the investigation and preliminary assessment of uncharged individuals,” it said. “This report should not be read to allege that any particular person other than Mr. Trump committed a crime, nor should it be read to exonerate any particular person.”

The release of this single volume of the report came less than a day after the judge in Florida who oversaw Mr. Trump’s other federal case, the one about the classified documents, issued a ruling allowing it to be made public.

But the judge, Aileen M. Cannon, who was appointed by Mr. Trump, also barred the Justice Department from immediately releasing — even to Congress — the second volume of Mr. Smith’s report, which is about the documents case. Judge Cannon has scheduled a hearing on Friday in her home courthouse in Fort Pierce, Fla., to discuss how to handle that particular volume.

For more than a week, Mr. Trump’s lawyers — who were shown a draft copy of Mr. Smith’s report before its release — denounced it as little more than an “attempted political hit job which sole purpose is to disrupt the presidential transition.” The lawyers fought the release of the report up to the last minute, but were ultimately unable to stop the volume on the election case from coming out.

In a social media post shortly before 2 a.m. Tuesday, Mr. Trump reacted with anger to the report’s release, calling Mr. Smith “deranged” and insisting that the prosecution was political.

“Jack is a lamebrain prosecutor who was unable to get his case tried before the Election, which I won in a landslide,” Mr. Trump said. “THE VOTERS HAVE SPOKEN!!!”

The election charges Mr. Smith brought against Mr. Trump accused him of engaging in three intersecting conspiracies to overturn his loss to President Biden. Mr. Smith also filed a separate indictment in Florida, charging Mr. Trump with illegally holding on to classified documents after he left office and conspiring with two co-defendants to obstruct the government’s repeated efforts to retrieve them.

After Mr. Trump won the 2024 election, Mr. Smith dropped the cases because of a Justice Department policy that prohibits the prosecution of sitting presidents. Under a separate department regulation, he was compelled to document the decisions he made in both cases and turn in a final report about them — one volume on each prosecution — to Attorney General Merrick B. Garland.

Last week, the Justice Department said Mr. Garland planned to hold off on issuing the volume about the classified documents case until all legal proceedings related to Mr. Trump’s two co-defendants were completed.

Lawyers for the co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, fought the release by obtaining an initial injunction last week from Judge Cannon, who had dismissed the classified documents case last summer.

Alan Feuer covers extremism and political violence for The Times, focusing on the criminal cases involving the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and against former President Donald J. Trump.  More about Alan Feuer"

Special Counsel Report Says Trump Would Have Been Convicted in Election Case - The New York Times

Pete Hegseth Faces Confirmation Hearing as Trump's Defense Secretary Pick: Live Updates - The New York Times

Live Updates: Senators Grill Hegseth on Drinking, Sexual Assault Allegations and Women in the Military

"Mr. Hegseth said he wouldn’t drink if confirmed as defense secretary. He denied a sexual assault allegation and said that military standards should not be lowered to accommodate women. Democrats repeatedly called him unfit for the job.

Video player loading
Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s pick to serve as defense secretary, faces members of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Pinned

Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s pick to lead the Pentagon, sought to defend himself against a raft of criticism during a confirmation hearing on Tuesday, as Democrats pressed him on his views about women in combat and support for convicted war criminals. Mr. Hegseth also claimed to have been the victim of a “smear campaign” that raised allegations of past misconduct.

But a key Republican member of the committee, Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, a veteran and a sexual assault survivor, appeared satisfied with his responses to her questions about the role of women in the military and sexual assault prevention. Ms. Ernst, who is seen as critical to Mr. Hegseth’s confirmation chances, spent much of her time focusing on their agreement that the Pentagon should be audited.

John Ismay
Jan. 14, 2025, 12:00 p.m. ET

In response to a recitation of the many allegations of personal misconduct that have been made against Hegseth, the nominee said: “I have failed in things in my life, and thankfully I’m redeemed by my lord and savior Jesus.” Falling back on religious claims of redemption appears to be Hegseth’s main line of defense for himself rather than offering substantive denials.

Karoun Demirjian
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:57 a.m. ET

Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, refuted Hegseth’s characterization that the charges against him were anonymous. “You claim that this was all anonymous? We have seen records with names attached to all of these, including the name of your own mother,” Kaine said, adding: “So don’t make this into some anonymous press thing.”

Eric Schmitt
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:56 a.m. ET

Senator Tim Kaine asked about allegations from former colleagues who claimed that he drank excessively, his admitted extramarital affairs and the sexual assault allegation. Hegseth vigorously denied the allegations but also refused to say whether that behavior would be disqualifying for a defense secretary.

Sharon LaFraniere
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:52 a.m. ET

Hegseth has repeatedly said that he was “completely cleared” by a police investigation into an accusation that he raped a woman in Monterey California in 2017. In fact, the police referred the case to the prosecutor’s office, and prosecutors declined to charge him. That is not the same as being completely cleared.

John Ismay
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:52 a.m. ET

Senator Tim Kaine is focusing on Hegseth’s history of adultery, asking if he would respect his oath of office as defense secretary the same way he did for his marriage vows to his first and second wives.

Dave Philipps
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:48 a.m. ET

Early in the hearing, Hegseth said that people who had positive things to say about him were ignored by the news media. But this New York Times article on his views over time about soldiers who were charged with war crimes quotes several people who served with and admired Hegseth.

Helene Cooper
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:46 a.m. ET

Hegseth says troops will “rejoice” if the Pentagon gets rid of the “woke” agenda. Some 43 percent of the 1.3 million men and women on active duty in the United States military are people of color.

Helene Cooper
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:44 a.m. ET

Hegseth: “One of the least racist institutions in our country is the military.” But until Lloyd Austin became secretary of defense in 2021, only white men led the Pentagon.

John Ismay
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:39 a.m. ET

Hegseth refuses to say whether he would direct U.S. forces to invade Greenland if the president ordered military action against the island, which is part of Denmark — a NATO ally.

Video player loading
Reuters
John Ismay
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:38 a.m. ET

Senator Mazie Hirono asked Hegseth a series of questions about accusations of sexual assault made against him. In response, he said he was falsely accused of sexual assault in 2017 and was “completely cleared.” The senator cast doubt on that assertion before moving on to questions about Hegseth’s use of alcohol in the workplace, and whether he would authorize American troops to shoot protesters.

Kenny Holston/The New York Times
Karoun Demirjian
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:33 a.m. ET

Senator Mazie Hirono also asked Hegseth if he would commit to resigning if he drinks on the job as secretary of defense. Hegseth said, “I’ve made this commitment on behalf of the men and women I’m serving” - an apparent reference to his promise that he would not let a drop of liquor pass his lips if he is confirmed. He doesn’t answer whether he would resign if he breaks that promise.

Video player loading
Sharon LaFraniere
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:33 a.m. ET

Hegseth’s pledge to abstain from alcohol echoed that of another nominee for defense secretary, John Tower, who in 1989 said: “If confirmed, I won’t have a drink.” Tower also promised to resign if he faltered, but it still was not enough to overcome his reputation of being a carouser and the Senate voted him down.

Kenny Holston/The New York Times
Karoun Demirjian
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:32 a.m. ET

Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii is the first Democratic senator on the panel to use her question time to directly query him about allegations of sexual assault and alcohol abuse.

Karoun Demirjian
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:32 a.m. ET

Ernst used her time to get Hegseth to repeat publicly promises she had previously said he made to her in private: to support the role of men and women in the military provided they can meet certain standards, to appoint a senior officer to strengthen her past work to prevent sexual assault and rape in the military, and to conduct an audit of the Pentagon.

Karoun Demirjian
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:29 a.m. ET

Senator Joni Ernst urges Hegseth, if confirmed, to stress that “every man and woman has opportunity to serve their country in uniform and do so at any level as long as they are meeting the standards that are set forward,” adding that she believes in high standards. Hegseth said he would support that with the caveats she articulated.

John Ismay
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:30 a.m. ET

Ernst noted that she was denied the opportunity to serve in combat because of her gender while in the Army.

Nearly two hours into his Senate hearing, Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to be defense secretary, has vigorously defended himself on a range of contentious issues, including a sexual assault allegation, his lack of management experience and his comments against women serving in combat.

In his opening remarks, Mr. Hegseth hinted at his disdain for the Pentagon’s diversity, equity and inclusion programs, saying “our standards will be high and they will be equal — not equitable.”

Sharon LaFraniere
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:27 a.m. ET

Blumenthal asked Hegseth repeatedly if he would agree to an expanded F.B.I. background check. Hegseth dodged, saying he wasn’t in charge of background checks. Democrats have criticized the background check as insufficiently thorough. According to several sources, the F.B.I. did not conduct a substantive interview of one of Hegseth’s ex-wives last week despite the fact she called the bureau repeatedly to try to set it up.

Video player loading
Reuters
Karoun Demirjian
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:24 a.m. ET

“I would support you as the spokesperson for the Pentagon, I don’t dispute your communication skills,” Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, as he argues Hegseth doesn’t have the management experience necessary to be defense secretary.

Karoun Demirjian
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:24 a.m. ET

Senator Joni Ernst, Republican of Iowa, kicks off her testimony by submitting a letter from Hegseth’s successor at Concerned Veterans of America, praising his leadership skills. Ernst has not said yet whether she will vote for Hegseth, though she committed to support him going through the Senate’s confirmation process.

Kenny Holston/The New York Times
Karoun Demirjian
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:13 a.m. ET

“Politics has nothing to do with the battlefield,” Hegseth said, as Democratic senators accuse him of politicizing the military. “This is about warfighting capability.”

John Ismay
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:10 a.m. ET

While Hegseth served as an infantry officer in the National Guard, there is no evidence that he attempted to attend the Army’s Ranger School — one of the most common leadership and small-unit tactics courses for infantry soldiers. Prior to 2015, women were prohibited from attending that course, but dozens have graduated from it since.

Karoun Demirjian
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:09 a.m. ET

As Democratic senators have been decrying Hegseth for his comments about women in combat roles, Republican senators have been entering various letters from female military officers supporting Hegseth into the record of the hearing.

Helene Cooper
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:05 a.m. ET

Military branches still require women to pass strict fitness tests for the most physically challenging specialty jobs, like the Army Rangers or Green Berets.

A small number of women have been able to meet the physical requirements to join those ranks.

John Ismay
Jan. 14, 2025, 11:05 a.m. ET

Not every woman in the service takes the specialized fitness tests for entering those training courses, just as not all men take them either."

Pete Hegseth Faces Confirmation Hearing as Trump's Defense Secretary Pick: Live Updates - The New York Times