Contact Me By Email

Contact Me By Email

Thursday, April 09, 2026

The deadliest 10 minutes in decades: Lebanese reel from Israeli strikes that killed hundreds | Lebanon | The Guardian

The deadliest 10 minutes in decades: Lebanese reel from Israeli strikes that killed hundreds

Ring of rescue workers beneath shell of destroyed building

"It took Israel only 10 minutes to carry out one of the worst mass-killings in Lebanonsince the end of the country’s civil war in 1990.

Omar Rakha heard the war planes but did not feel the explosions; it was only when he woke up face down on the street, bleeding, that he understood what had happened: the building next to his in the Barbour neighbourhood of central Beirut had been destroyed by two Israeli bombs. He then ran through the flaming wreckage to find his sister, screaming.

Smoke rises from multistorey building
Israeli airstrikes hit Beirut on Wednesday. Photograph: Hassan Ammar/AP

Shaden Fakih, a 24-year-old calisthenics trainer, also ran towards the impact site; his friend Mahmoud was inside the struck building. He could only get so close; the multistorey building was a pile of burning rubble. Fakih began to pull people out of the apartments in front of the site, carrying in his arms an old woman who could not walk. There was no sign of Mahmoud and the neighbourhood – once thought to be safe from Israeli bombs – felt like a war zone.

Dr Ghassan Abu-Sittah was in the emergency room when the casualties began to arrive. Among the wounded were children pulled from under the rubble; many arrived alone, without parents, their identities unknown. “The youngest was an 11-month-old. I had to operate on him just to relieve some pressure in the head,” said Abu-Sittah, who works as a surgeon at the American University of Beirut Medical College (AUBMC).

Dozens of people at destroyed building lit up at night
Rescue workers search the rubble for survivors and casualties in Beirut. Photograph: Daniel Carde/Getty Images

The flood of wounded came after Israel bombed more than 100 targets across Lebanon in those 10 minutes on Wednesday, killing at least 254 people and wounding 1,165, according to an initial count by Lebanon’s civil defence. The death toll, which was expected to rise as more bodies were found, was higher than Beirut’s 2020 port explosion – one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in human history.

The Israeli military said it had hit Hezbollah “command and control centres” in the bombing campaign, which it dubbed “Operation Eternal Darkness”.

But residents and Lebanese officials said the strikes, which used 1,000lb bombs in densely packed residential areas of Beirut, mainly killed civilians. Lebanon’s prime minister, Nawaf Salam, accused Israel in a statement of targeting “densely populated residential neighbourhoods” and killing unarmed civilians in breach of international law.

Abu-Sittah said most of the people were wounded in a very short period of time, which was “intentional to flood the health system”, and he compared the aftermath to the mass casualty events he saw while working in Gaza.

The AUBMC received about 70 wounded people all at once; many critically injured, according to Dr Firass Abiad, a surgeon and Lebanon’s former health minister. Crush injuries, lots of elderly people, a woman who had to have both her legs amputated – Abiad rattled off the toll of the day in a tired voice.

Burnt shells of about a dozen cars amid rubble as several people look on.
Destroyed buildings and burned vehicles in the Corniche al-Mazraa area of Beirut. Photograph: Houssam Shbaro/Anadolu/Getty Images

“There was a 90-year-old who I just left a bit ago. He passed away from his wounds … There was nothing we could do,” Abiad said. “These are civilians who, without any warning, their whole apartment building was flattened. So you can imagine the severity of injuries that we’re getting.”

First responders in Barbour worked to find people trapped under the rubble. Firefighters sprayed water on the smouldering remains of the building while forklifts lifted crumpled cars to clear the road for ambulances. An emergency worker on the scene said they had not yet found any survivors, only pieces of people.

A man FaceTimed his son, showing him a crumpled car. “You said it was a Volkswagen?” he said, haplessly looking at the crowd around him as he inspected the car. Its badge had been blown off the bumper and the twisted metal left the car unrecognisable.

Rakha watched as the civil defence worked. “I really didn’t think something like this would happen here. Nothing like this happened in the last war [and] because of that all of the refugees came here for safety,” the 38-year-old supermarket owner said, his head wrapped in a blood-stained bandage.

Several rescue workers with rubble behind
A man carries pieces of clothing at the site of an Israeli strike in Ain al-Mraiseh, Beirut. Photograph: Mohamed Azakir/Reuters

Barbour, like many of the areas in Beirut that Israel struck on Wednesday, is a mixed neighbourhood where Hezbollah enjoys little support. As more than 1.1 million people were displaced by Israeli bombing over the last month, schools in Barbour opened their doors to shelter the fleeing families.

The neighbourhood had not previously been considered within the scope of Israel’s war in Lebanon. But Israel’s military suggested on Wednesday that such areas had now become targets, claiming they had been infiltrated by Hezbollah fighters.

Israel’s Arabic language spokesperson Avichay Adraee said on Wednesday: “Recently, the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] observed the terrorist group Hezbollah began leaving the Shiite strongholds in the suburbs and repositioning itself towards northern Beirut and the mixed areas of the city.” He vowed that Israel would “continue to pursue” Hezbollah fighters wherever they might be located.

The Israeli military’s statements and bombing erased any hope that the ceasefire with Iran might also halt the war in Lebanon. The war, which started after Hezbollah launched rockets at Israel on 2 March prompting an Israeli bombing campaign and invasion of Lebanon, has left around 1,800 people dead and 5,873 wounded in Lebanon.

Barbour’s residents rejected Israel’s explanation of its attacks, saying the strikes were driving even Hezbollah’s critics towards the group.

Mourners carry the coffin of Lebanese man Mohammed Zain Al-Abidin Shehab
The funeral of Mohammed Zain Al-Abidin Shehab, who was killed in an Israeli strike on Wednesday.Photograph: Mohamed Azakir/Reuters

Fakih said: “It’s getting ridiculous. There’s no Hezbollah here, the Israelis are just getting happy when they bomb people, it’s not about Hezbollah.

“Just stop bombing us. If you want to kill Hezbollah, go for it, but don’t kill civilians, because you’re creating anger in us against Israel and we will have to act like Hezbollah just to defend our country. But I don’t want to do that, I just want to live in peace.”

As night fell, people began to take stock of the dizzying, bloody day. Pictures of dust-covered babies pulled out from under rubble circulated on WhatsApp groups as people searched for their relatives.

People shared a selfie of a smiling elderly couple, Mohammed and Khatoun Karshat, desperately asking if anyone had seen them after they went missing in one of the strikes. Their bodies were found under the rubble late in the night, and people kept sharing their selfie, now in memoriam.

Fakih lingered by the impact site in Barbour as rescuers worked. It had been hours and he had not heard from his friend Mahmoud; his calls went to voicemail.

“It’s been the worst day since the war started,” Fakih said. “And what I’m most sad about is that my pretty Lebanon, our beautiful Lebanon, soon it will all be brought down to the ground.”

The deadliest 10 minutes in decades: Lebanese reel from Israeli strikes that killed hundreds | Lebanon | The Guardian

The Fog Of Peace | How Bibi Got Trump To Bomb Iran | JD Vance’s Cringe Call

 

Wednesday, April 08, 2026

Pam Bondi’s Legacy of Flattery and Destruction

 

Pam Bondi’s Legacy of Flattery and Destruction

“No Attorney General has done more damage to the Justice Department. Her successor could be even more dangerous.

Pam Bondi's profile with a red blur.

Photograph by Tom Brenner / The Washington Post / Getty

Congress created the office of Attorney General in the Judiciary Act of 1789, providing for the appointment of a person “learned in the law” to advise the President on legal matters. Eighty-four men and three women have held the job since then; the most recent occupant, Pam Bondi, who was fired on Thursday, would face some competition for the title of worst Attorney General. After all, some of her predecessors were outright corrupt: Richard Nixon’s Attorney General, John Mitchell, served time in prison for helping orchestrate the Watergate break-in and coverup. Some were heedless of the Constitution they had sworn to uphold: Woodrow Wilson’s Attorney General, Mitchell Palmer, directed the raids that bear his name, leading to the mass arrest and deportation of suspected anarchists. But no Attorney General in history has caused more damage to the department itself—damage that promises to long outlast Bondi’s tenure, and to be deepened, not repaired, by whoever is chosen to succeed her.

Bondi, a former attorney general of Florida, has presided over a department that has eagerly subordinated itself to President Donald Trump’s whims. That submission, made manifest by the banner of a glowering Trump that now hangs from the Department of Justice building, included seeking to bring baseless cases against Trump’s perceived political enemies, ordered up by the President himself; purging the department of career lawyers and F.B.I. agents deemed insufficiently loyal; and launching a belligerent campaign against “rogue judges” who dared to challenge Administration actions. Beyond the mass firings, the ranks of the department have been depleted by the departure of employees who could not stomach the new order; the resulting loss of expertise will take generations to rebuild. So will the department’s credibility: under Bondi, it has squandered the traditional deference afforded to lawyers who appear in court on behalf of the United States, known as “the presumption of regularity.” “You have taken the presumption of regularity and you’ve destroyed it, in my view,” the federal judge overseeing the government’s efforts to deport Kilmar Ábrego García told department lawyers last year, and she is far from alone in her exasperation.

Bondi fawned over Trump in a way unbefitting the nation’s chief law-enforcement officer. At an early Cabinet meeting, Bondi said, “President, your first one hundred days has far exceeded that of any other Presidency in this country, ever, ever.” She treated Democratic members of Congress with undisguised contempt, including at an appearance before the House Judiciary Committee, in February. “You don’t tell me anything, you washed-up loser lawyer. Not even a lawyer,” Bondi yelled at the panel’s ranking Democrat, Jamie Raskin, of Maryland (who, as it happens, is a Harvard Law graduate and a former constitutional-law professor). Questioned about her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, Bondi deflected. “The Dow is over fifty thousand right now, the S. & P. at almost seven thousand, and the Nasdaq smashing records, Americans’ 401(k)s and retirement savings are booming,” she said, launching a thousand memes.

But Bondi’s departure does not augur a better world to come. Like the former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whom Trump fired in March, Bondi had become a political liability. She had, in the words of the White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, “completely whiffed” on dealing with conservative clamor for the Epstein files. As Wiles told Vanity Fair, “First she gave them binders full of nothingness. And then she said that the witness list, or the client list, was on her desk. There is no client list, and it sure as hell wasn’t on her desk.” No single issue has plagued Trump’s second term more than his dealings with the convicted sex offender, and Bondi botched the matter from the start—a reality underscored by the Republican-controlled House Oversight Committee’s vote, last month, to subpoena Bondi’s testimony regarding the Epstein files.

Trump’s move to get rid of Noem, however, also reflected some degree of recognition that the mass-deportation campaign had gone too far, or at least turned off too many Trump supporters. In Bondi’s case, the President was reportedly furious not because she went too far but because she had failed to do his bidding swiftly and effectively enough. His dwindling patience emerged in a Truth Social post from September, 2025—Trump reportedly had meant it as a private message to Bondi—in which the President addressed her as “Pam” and railed about the department’s failure to secure indictments against the former F.B.I. director James Comey, the New York attorney general Letitia James, and the California senator Adam Schiff. “We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility,” Trump instructed Bondi. “They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!” The department duly secured indictments of Comey and James, only to have them dismissed after a federal judge found that Lindsey Halligan, the insurance lawyer tapped by Trump to serve as the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, had been improperly appointed. Since then, the department has been stalled in its efforts to secure the kind of prosecutions that he has demanded. Prosecutors were stymied in their efforts to find a criminal case in President Joe Biden’s use of an autopen to grant pardons. A federal grand jury refused to indict six Democratic members of Congress who had posted a video reminding service members they are not obliged to follow illegal orders. In Virginia, grand juries twice balked at indictments of James after the original charges were tossed.

The new Attorney General is apt to be just as destructive as Bondi—maybe even more so, given that Bondi, who had little familiarity with the federal legal system, was not terribly effective in the job. Trump named the Deputy Attorney General, Todd Blanche, formerly one of the President’s criminal-defense lawyers, as acting Attorney General. Blanche is a veteran of the prestigious Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s office, and there was some hope, when he was named to the department’s No. 2 role, that he would help stand up for its independence. But there is little evidence that Blanche has tempered Trump’s worst instincts, and ample illustration that he is fully on board with the President’s agenda. He conducted a credulous interview with Ghislaine Maxwell, last July, which looks even shoddier now than it did then, in light of the Epstein documents that have since been released. Last week, Blanche spoke at CPAC, the Conservative Political Action Conference, a venue far more partisan than is common for a Deputy Attorney General. Blanche did not shy away from politics—he plunged in. Disputing reports that he had been a Democrat, Blanche paused. “Everybody’s supposed to say ‘Boo,’ ” he told the audience, before thanking them when they responded accordingly. This is not acceptable behavior from a senior law-enforcement official.

Maybe Blanche will get the job permanently. Maybe Trump will turn to Lee Zeldin, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, who has no prosecutorial experience but has demonstrated the primary requirement: unswerving fealty to Trump. Years ago, during his first term, Trump was lamenting the perfidy of his first Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, the former Alabama senator. Sessions was insisting on recusing himself from the probe into the Trump campaign’s involvement with Russia; Trump wanted him to stay, the better to protect his interests. “Where’s my Roy Cohn,” Trump demanded, referring to the legendary former fixer who had shown Trump how to bend the legal system to his will. With Bondi gone—she’ll be “transitioning to a much needed and important new job in the private sector,” Trump announced in a post—his quest for the next Roy Cohn continues. Anyone he picks for the post will understand clearly what that entails. ♦

Even as They Praise Iran Cease-Fire, World Leaders Are Whipsawed by Trump - The New York Times

Even as They Praise Iran Cease-Fire, World Leaders Are Whipsawed by Trump

"Across Europe and the globe, the war has damaged economies, roiled politics and underscored a lack of options in dealing with President Trump’s whims.

President Trump, in a dark suit, approaches a lectern with the American flag behind it, as reporters sit in chairs awaiting him.
President Trump addresses the media at the White House on Monday.Kenny Holston/The New York Times

World leaders expressed relief on Wednesday that the United States, Israel and Iran had agreed to a temporary cease-fire, with President Trump backing off his apocalyptic threat to escalate a war that had already set off a cascading series of global crises.

But the relief was tempered by the profound powerlessness that most countries have felt over the last six weeks as they watched Mr. Trump wage a war that has rattled their economies, their energy supplies, their domestic politics and their relationships with the world’s pre-eminent superpower.

World leaders have been swept up in Mr. Trump’s personal and geopolitical gyrations since the war began in late February. They have been left guessing whether he would lob new strikes at Tehran or call an end to hostilities — both of which he has signaled at various times. They have endured long rants about the United States receiving insufficient help and gratitude from allies, laced with threats about quitting NATO, all while suffering oil and gas price shocks and supply shortages caused by the war.

Officials in some of those countries noted the hurdles that remain for the two-week cease-fire to become permanent, including addressing the thorny issues of Iran’s nuclear ambitions and securing the Strait of Hormuz for global shipping. They acknowledged how difficult, and time-consuming, it would be to repair the cracks this war has opened in the global economy and security environment.

And they were left searching for better ways to navigate the new world order that Mr. Trump has brought to bear in his second term in the White House, in which the president whipsaws friends and foes alike, with few little ability to buffer the shocks.

“Is the world a better place today than yesterday? Undoubtedly,” the Danish foreign minister, Lars Lokke Rasmussen, wrote on the social media platform X. “Than 40 days ago? More than doubtful.”

Pedro Sánchez, the prime minister of Spain, an outspoken opponent of the Iran war, said that cease-fires were  “always good news,” especially, he added, “if they lead to a just and durable peace.” But he also delivered a harsh condemnation of Mr. Trump’s military campaign.

“The momentary relief cannot make us forget the chaos, the destruction, and the lives lost,” he wrote on social media. “The government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket. What is needed now: diplomacy, international law and PEACE.”

Perhaps surprisingly, Mr. Sánchez joined a half-dozen other European leaders, along with leaders from Canada, the European Commission and the European Council, in committing Wednesday to provide government support “to ensuring freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.” 

Such an effort remains conceptual for now, despite Mr. Trump’s insistence that his NATO allies send military assets to help relieve the Iranian blockade of the waterway, with the goal of bringing global oil and gas prices back down from elevated levels. 

Beyond Europe, the cease-fire also drew praise from countries including Oman, Japan, Malaysia and Australia, sometimes accompanies by criticism of Mr. Trump and the effects of the war on their economies — or discussions of the tough diplomatic road ahead.

“While this is encouraging news, there remains significant important work to be done in the coming days to secure a lasting cease-fire,” Winston Peters, the foreign minister of New Zealand, said in a statement. The war, he said, “has had wide-ranging impacts and disruptions — for both those in the Middle East and further afield.”

Other leaders nodded heavily to the war’s ongoing disruptions of global energy supplies, which have pushed many governments to take costly measures to soften the burden on drivers and other consumers.

“The goal now must be to negotiate a lasting end to the war in the coming days,” Friedrich Merz, the chancellor of Germany, said in a statement on Wednesday, which also pledged German help in an international effort to reopen the strait. Those negotiations, he added, “can avert a severe global energy crisis.”

To their frustration, leaders appear to have little ability to influence Mr. Trump, in this war or any other conflict. The difficulty of parsing Mr. Trump’s bellicose and often shifting pronouncements has been a monthlong challenge. Other leaders have adopted a variety of responses, including mild support, measured pushback and sometimes just public silence, hoping Mr. Trump will change his mind on his own.

Take Tuesday, for instance, when Mr. Trump made the apocalyptic threat to Iran, saying the U.S. would wipe out its civilization. Neither Mr. Merz nor Keir Starmer, the British prime minister, responded publicly to the statement, nor did Emmanuel Macron, the French president.

That appeared to be a deliberate silence, avoiding any possible provocation of the American president, while diplomats — led by the Pakistani government — worked behind the scenes to secure the cease-fire. Instead, Mr. Macron and Mr. Merz posted unrelated comments on the social media platform X. 

Other officials across Europe have tried for the last month to blunt the economic and political impacts of the spiking price of oil and gas, driven by the war.

In Italy, the president of a teachers’ union has warned that students might have to return to remote learning in the final weeks of school if fuel shortages continue and made it difficult to keep buildings open. The crisis has hit Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni at a vulnerable time politically, after she lost a referendum to overhaul the Italian judiciary.

Ms. Meloni’s cabinet has cut fuel taxes through at least the end of May to provide some relief for consumers. Spain has similarly cut energy taxes. German officials have limited gas stations to only one price increase per day, and they are debating further measures to help consumers. The European Trade Union Confederation estimated Wednesday that a prolonged crisis could raise energy costs by nearly 2,000 euros, or around $2,300, this year for a typical European Union household.

Experts warn more help could be needed, even with the progress in negotiations.

“What has been done so far has created deep damages to the energy infrastructure,” said Tito Boeri, a professor of economics at Bocconi University in Milan. “So even if the Hormuz Strait is reopened it will take time before these countries go back to full capacity.”

Mr. Starmer of Britain was set to travel to the Persian Gulf on Wednesday to meet with allies and discuss how to keep the strait permanently open to international shipping, government officials said. His trip was planned before the cease-fire was announced. It follows discussions on the strait hosted by Britain over the last week among diplomats and military planners from more than 40 countries.

As of Wednesday, those talks had yet to produce a full plan of action.

Motoko Rich in Rome, Carlos Barragán in Madrid, Laura Chung in Sydney and Michael D. Shear in London contributed reporting.

Jim Tankersley is the Berlin bureau chief for The Times, leading coverage of Germany, Austria and Switzerland."


Even as They Praise Iran Cease-Fire, World Leaders Are Whipsawed by Trump - The New York Times

Iran War Live Updates: Fragile Cease-Fire Takes Hold as Both Sides Claim Victory

Iran War Live Updates: Fragile Cease-Fire Takes Hold as Both Sides Claim Victory

International relief was tempered by uncertainty over what comes next. Israel declared its support for the two-week truce between the U.S. and Iran, but pressed ahead with its strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Open modal at item 1of 3
Open modal at item 2of 3
Open modal at item 3of 3
Iranians in Tehran on Wednesday, the morning after the announcement of a cease-fire in the war that began on Feb. 28.
Pinned

Here’s the latest.

A fragile cease-fire between the United States and Iran appeared to be holding on Wednesday, as both sides claimed victory amid deep uncertainty about plans to fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz and the next steps in the diplomatic process.

President Trump said Wednesday that the United States would “work closely with Iran” after demanding Tehran’s “unconditional surrender” for weeks. Iranian officials were triumphant after the agreement, brokered by Pakistan, was announced, with Mohammad Reza Aref, the country’s first vice president, saying on social media that “the era of Iran” had begun after Mr. Trump failed to destroy the Islamic Republic’s government. Iran said the strait would remain open while negotiations took place.

Shipping companies signaled that they were cautious about resuming transit through the waterway. Two bulk carriers crossed on Wednesday, according to Kpler, a tracking company. A handful of ships have moved through each day since the war began, but more than 400 vessels remain “effectively stranded” in the Persian Gulf, Kpler said.

Israel, which said the cease-fire did not extend to Lebanon, on Wednesday carried out its largest strike against Hezbollah since that front opened up following the militant group’s rocket attacks on Israel in solidarity with Iran in March. Lebanon’s health ministry said that dozens of people had been killed and hundreds more wounded in the strikes on Beirut, the Lebanese capital, and other parts of the country.

Further highlighting the fragility of the truce, Iran’s state media reported that an oil refinery on Lavan, an Iranian island in the Persian Gulf, was struck by unspecified “enemies.” Fresh Iranian attacks were also reported in some Persian Gulf countries. Kuwait’s defense ministry said that its air defenses had engaged with at least 28 drones from Iran despite the cease-fire.

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif of Pakistan wrote on social media that cease-fire violations had been reported at a “few places across the conflict zone,” which undermined the spirit of the diplomatic process. He urged all parties to “exercise restraint.”

Investors welcomed the cease-fire after weeks of war, which caused an energy crisis and turmoil for global markets. The price of oil tumbled on Wednesday, with Brent crude, the international benchmark, down almost 15 percent to about $95 a barrel. Global stock markets soared.

Worldwide relief at the pause in fighting was tempered by confusion over what would come next. Many challenges remain if the United States and Iran are to achieve a permanent deal to end the war. And restarting operations at damaged refineries, storage facilities, and oil and gas fields will take time.

Nima, who lives in the Iranian capital, Tehran, said Wednesday morning was the first time in around 40 days that he had not feared his colleagues might be killed in an airstrike. It was a good feeling, he said — the latest in a swirl of emotions experienced by Iranians like him, after Mr. Trump’s threat to wipe out their civilization on Tuesday and reports of a flurry of negotiations to pause the war.

“Last night was a really frightening evening,” said Nima, who declined to be fully named, fearing reprisals from the government.

Here’s what else we’re covering:

  • U.S. defense officials: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held a news conference at the Pentagon. They presented a partial list of Iranian targets hit during the war, and statistics they claimed illustrated the damage to Iran’s military. Mr. Hegseth said that additional U.S. forces would remain in the region during the temporary truce.

  • Israel: Critics of Mr. Netanyahu called the cease-fire “a diplomatic disaster,” and accused him of failing to achieve his stated war goal of destroying Iran’s theocratic government.

  • Persian Gulf: Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates reported missile and drone attacks on Wednesday. Bahrain’s interior ministry sounded warning sirens and reported a fire started by an Iranian attack.

  • Pakistan: Mr. Sharif said he had invited U.S. and Iranian delegations for talks in Islamabad on Friday, and Iran’s National Security Council said that Iran would attend. The Trump administration said it was in discussions about holding in-person talks with Iran.

  • Death tolls: The Human Rights Activists News Agency said at least 1,665 civilians, including 244 children, had been killed in Iran as of Monday. Lebanon’s health ministry on Monday said that more than 1,500 people had been killed in the latest fighting between Israel and Hezbollah. In attacks blamed on Iran, at least 32 people have been killed in Gulf nations. In Israel, at least 20 people had been killed as of Monday. The American death toll stands at 13 service members."