Contact Me By Email

Contact Me By Email

Sunday, March 22, 2026

‘Nobody else is responsible’: Trump to blame for Iran crisis, ex-CIA chief says | Donald Trump | The Guardian

‘Nobody else is responsible’: Trump to blame for Iran crisis, ex-CIA chief says

"Leon Panetta calls president ‘naive’ over strait of Hormuz closure and says ‘the chickens are coming home to roost’

a man in front of microphones
Leon Panetta, the former defence secretary and CIA director, at the Democratic national convention in Chicago in 2024. Photograph: Mike Segar/Reuters

Donald Trump is stuck between “a rock and a hard place” after three weeks of war in Iran and “sending a message of weakness” to the world, Leon Panetta, a former US defence secretary and Central Intelligence Agency director, has told the Guardian.

Panetta, who served in the Bill Clinton and Barack Obama administrations, recalled that national security officials were always keenly aware of Iran’s ability to create an energy crisis by blocking the strait of Hormuz. That very scenario is now unfolding, leaving Trump with no exit strategy beyond wishful thinking.

“He tends to be naive about how things can happen,” Panetta, 87, who supervised the operation to find and kill Osama bin Laden, said by phone. “If he says it and keeps saying it there’s always a hope that what he says will come true. But that’s what kids do. It’s not what presidents do.”

Trump’s war began on 28 February with what it hoped would be a knockout blow. A surprise strike by Israel killed Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The US and Israel soon gained air supremacy. But the longer the conflict has raged, the more that initiative appears to be slipping away.

Thirteen US service members and, according to Iranian health officials, more than 1,400 Iranians have been killed while Khamenei was succeeded by his son, Mojtaba Khamenei. Trump has struggled to sell the war at home as oil prices rise, his polling numbers fall and his electoral coalition shows signs of splintering. He has fumed at news coverage and sent mixed signals on objectives or when the “excursion”, as he terms it, will reach a conclusion.

Panetta said: “We replaced an old guy, a supreme leader who was near death at a time when the people of Iran were willing to take to the streets with the hope that they could ultimately change their way of government. And instead today we have a more entrenched regime, we have a younger supreme leader who’s going to be there a while, and he’s much more of a hardliner than the first supreme leader. That didn’t turn out too well.”

The regime has retaliated against the US and Israel by effectively closing the strait of Hormuz, throwing global energy markets into a tailspin. A fifth of the world’s traded oil flows through the waterway.

For Panetta, it is a crisis of the president’s own making. “This is not rocket science to understand that if you’re going to conduct a war with Iran, one of the great vulnerabilities is the strait of Hormuz, and [it] could create an immense oil crisis that could drive the price of fuel sky-high.

“In every national security council I’ve been a part of where we’ve talked about Iran, that subject always came up. For some reason, either they didn’t consider that could be a consequence or they thought the war would end quickly and they wouldn’t have to worry about that.”

He continued: “Whatever it was, they were not prepared for it and they’re now paying a price because, if there was an escape here for Trump, it would be to declare victory and it’s over and we’ve been able to be successful in all of our military targets. The problem is he can declare victory all he wants but, if he doesn’t get the ceasefire, he’s got nothing.

“And he’s not going to get a ceasefire as long as Iran is holding the gun of the strait of Hormuz against his head.”

Trump has said he does not plan to put US boots on the ground in Iran but is also sending thousands of marines to the Middle East in a possible sign of a coming operation. On Friday he declined to confirm a report by the Axios news outlet that he was considering an occupation or blockade of Iran’s Kharg Island to pressure Iran to reopen the strait.

Panetta said: “He’s facing a very tough issue, which is: does he go to expand the war by trying to get the strait of Hormuz open so that he can eliminate that leverage and maybe be able to ultimately negotiate with Iran? Or does he just simply walk away and declare victory, although everybody will clearly understand that he’s failed?

“It’s a very tough position he’s in right now but nobody else is responsible for where he’s at than Donald Trump.”

Help is not on the way. Last Saturday, Trump posted that other countries may need to help keep the strait of Hormuz open, the reaction was underwhelming. On Friday, Trump branded Nato a “paper tiger” without the US and mocked its members as “cowards”. He kept allies other than Israel in the dark about his war plans for Iran.

Panetta commented: “If you’re planning a war, it’s not a bad idea to talk to your allies. Alliances are important to be able to support any kind of military effort. We’ve learned that lesson going back a long way to world war two. But he [Trump] takes a callous approach to alliances and now he suddenly finds himself in a place where he’s got to turn to allies, to Nato and to others, all of whom he certainly hasn’t treated well in his presidency, to try to help bail him out.”

The former defence secretary added with a chuckle: “The chickens are coming home to roost.”

He advises Trump to abandon his magical thinking and “face the fact” that he must use the military to open the strait, neutralise Iranian defences along the coast and deploy ships to escort oil tankers through.

“There’s no question there’s going to be lives lost and it’s clearly going to expand the war but I don’t see the alternative. He’s got to do it. He’s talked a great deal about the strength of the United States. This is a test of whether the United States can be able to deal with that situation which otherwise is not only going to prolong the war but create a lot of economic damage to the United States with those soaring fuel prices and cause what some have said is a potential worldwide recession.”

Panetta added frankly: “There’s not much choice. You’ve got to do what you have to do and, if you can open the strait, it might give you a better chance to then have a basis on which you can negotiate hopefully some kind of ceasefire. That’s the only way that he can go at this point; otherwise he will clearly have failed to find a solution.

An ex-army intelligence officer, Panetta was White House chief of staff in the Clinton administration then served as CIA director and the 23rd secretary of defence under Obama. He is now chairman of the Panetta Institute for Public Policy based at California State University, Monterey Bay. His son, Jimmy Panetta, is a Democratic member of Congress from California and former navy reserve intelligence officer.

He is not impressed by the bombastic antics of Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News host who now occupies Panetta’s old office at the Pentagon. “He’s not a secretary of defence. He is simply an enabler for whatever Trump wants him to do.”

Panetta also condemns a recent run of meme-style videos released by the White House that juxtapose war footage with Hollywood films, video games and sporting action, as well as a fundraising email that used a photo of Trump at a dignified transfer of remains of soldiers killed in Kuwait.

Panetta said: “When he or those around him started publishing pictures of football games, raising money by using pictures of our dead coming home at Dover [air force base], and doing the kind of tasteless things that he can do, he’s basically sending a message of weakness, not a message of strength to the world.

“That, unfortunately, is what the world sees right now, and I can see why he’s having problems trying to get allies to be able to respond when they’re not sure he knows what he’s doing.”

Born during the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt, Panetta has never seen a commander-in-chief shatter norms as Trump does. When a Tomahawk missile hit a girls’ school in southern Iran on the first day of the conflict, killing at least 175 people, most of them children, Trump sought to blame the attack on Iran, claiming its security forces are “very inaccurate” with munitions.

“Any other president of the United States would have recognised the mistake and apologise for what happened,” Panetta remarked. “He doesn’t do that. It sends an image of America that kind of fits the ugly American image that a lot of people once had of this country.”


Trump tells Iran it has 48 hours to open Hormuz or US will ‘obliterate’ its power plants | Strait of Hormuz | The Guardian

Trump tells Iran it has 48 hours to open Hormuz or US will ‘obliterate’ its power plants

"US president threatens to take out Iranian energy facilities – ‘starting with the biggest one first’ – if Tehran does not reopen the strait

President Donald Trump, accompanied by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaks with reporters while departing the White House
The US president, Donald Trump, accompanied by his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, speaks with reporters. Photograph: Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

Donald Trump has given Iran 48 hours to reopen the strait of Hormuz to shipping or face the destruction of its energy infrastructure, as Tehran launched its most destructive attack yet on Israel.

The ultimatum, made just a day after the US president said he was considering “winding down” military operations after three weeks of war, came as the key oil passage remained effectively closed and thousands more US Marines headed to the Middle East.

Trump wrote on Truth Social that the US would “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants – “starting with the biggest one first” – if Tehran did not fully reopen the strait within 48 hours, or 23:44 GMT on Monday according to the time of his post.

A red oil tanker with a flash of lightning behind it
The tanker Rarity sits at anchor off the Sultan Qaboos port in Muscat, Oman. Photograph: Stelios Misinas/Reuters

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Tehran had imposed restrictions only on vessels from countries involved in attacks against Iran, and would assist others that stayed out of the conflict.

In response to Trump’s threat, Iran’s army said it will target energy and desalination infrastructure “belonging to the US and the regime in the region,” according to the Fars news agency.

Trump’s ultimatum came hours after two Iranian missiles struck southern Israel, injuring more than 100 people in the most destructive attack since the war began. The Israel prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, vowed to retaliate “on all fronts”.

The strikes, which slipped through Israel’s missile defence systems, tore open the facades of residential buildings and carved craters into the ground.

First responders said 84 people were injured in the town of Arad, 10 of them seriously. Hours earlier, 33 were wounded in nearby Dimona, where AFPTV footage showed a large hole gouged into the ground next to piles of rubble and twisted metal.

Dimona hosts a facility widely believed to be the site of the Middle East’s only nuclear arsenal, although Israel has never admitted to possessing nuclear weapons.

The Israeli army told Agence France-Presse there had been a “direct missile hit on a building” in Dimona, with casualties reported at multiple sites, including a 10-year-old boy in serious condition with shrapnel wounds.

Emergency workers gather at the site of an Iranian missile strike
Emergency workers gather in the early hours at the site of an Iranian missile strike in Arad, Israel. Photograph: Erik Marmor/Getty Images

Netanyahu vowed to continue striking Iran. Hours later, the Israeli military said its forces had launched a wave of strikes on Tehran.

Iran said the targeting of Dimona was retaliation for Israeli strikes on its Natanz nuclear facility, with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) saying forces also targeted other southern Israeli towns as well as military sites in Kuwait and the UAE.

After the Natanz attack, the UN nuclear watchdog chief, Rafael Grossi, reiterated his call for “military restraint to avoid any risk of a nuclear accident”.

The Natanz facility hosts underground centrifuges used to enrich uranium for Iran’s disputed nuclear programme; it sustained damage in the June 2025 war.

The Israeli military denied it was behind the Natanz strike, but said it had struck a facility at a Tehran university that it claimed was being used to develop nuclear weapon components for Iran’s ballistic missile programme.

A satellite image shows the Natanz nuclear facility with some building damage
A satellite image shows the Natanz nuclear facility with some damage to the buildings. Photograph: VANTOR/Reuters

The United Arab Emirates said on Saturday it faced aerial attacks after Iran warned it against allowing strikes from its territory on disputed islands near the strait of Hormuz.

Iran has choked the vital waterway, which carries a fifth of global crude oil trade in peacetime.

The standoff has sent crude oil prices soaring, with North Sea Brent crude now trading above $105 a barrel, as long-term consequences for the global economy become an acute concern.

A joint statement from the leaders of several countries – including the UK, France, Italy, Germany, South Korea, Australia, the UAE and Bahrain – condemned the “de facto closure of the strait of Hormuz by Iranian forces”.

“We express our readiness to contribute to appropriate efforts to ensure safe passage through the Strait,” they said.

Trump has slammed Nato allies as “cowards” and urged them to secure the strait.

On Sunday, Japan said it could consider deploying its military for minesweeping in the strait of Hormuz, if a ceasefire is reached.

The foreign minister, Toshimitsu Motegi, said: “If there were to be a complete ceasefire, hypothetically speaking, then things like minesweeping could come up.

“This is purely hypothetical, but if a ceasefire were established and naval mines were creating an obstacle, then I think that would be something to consider,” Motegi said on Japanese TV.

Japan’s military actions are limited under its postwar pacifist constitution, but 2015 security legislation allows Japan to use its self-defence forces overseas if an attack, including on a close security partner, threatens Japan’s survival and no other means are available to address it.

Japan gets about 90% of its oil shipments via the strait, which Tehran has largely closed during the war, now in its fourth week"

With Reuters and Agence France-Presse

The Supreme Court Could Make it Harder to Vote by Mail in the Midterms - The New York Times

The Supreme Court Could Make It Harder to Vote by Mail in the Midterms

"The Republican National Committee wants to toss ballots arriving after Election Day. Critics say thousands of votes — a majority cast by Democrats — are at stake.

The exterior of the top of the Supreme Court building, with “Justice The Guardian of Liberty” written on it.
The Supreme Court in Washington. Watson v. Republican National Committee will be the subject of oral arguments on Monday.Al Drago for The New York Times

A case about mail voting that will be the subject of oral arguments before the Supreme Court Monday in some ways boils down to a simple question. What is the definition of Election Day?

But the potential political consequences of the case, which was brought by allies of President Trump who want to bar states from counting mailed ballots that arrive after Election Day, are far more tangible.

Coming smack in the middle of this year’s hotly contested battle for control of Congress, the case could upend election rules in at least 18 states and territories, potentially disqualifying hundreds of thousands of mail ballots in upcoming contests that would be considered valid under current law.

The case, Watson v. Republican National Committee, stems from President Trump’s fixation with mail voting, and will test the effort of Mr. Trump and his allies to impose voting restrictions born out of his baseless claims of widespread fraud. There is scant evidence, for instance, for his claim that accepting ballots postmarked by Election Day but received afterward invites a flood of phony votes that sway results.

Whether the law allows for states to establish such grace periods is a more convoluted legal question.

Federal statute establishes Election Day as the “Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November.” Some say that means all votes must be in the hands of election officials by then; others say ballots must simply be cast and postmarked by that day.

Specifically, Watson v. R.N.C. challenges a Mississippi law that allows election officials to count ballots postmarked by Election Day but arriving up to five business days later. Mississippi is one of 14 states with such laws, though the length of the grace period varies. Similar laws are also on the books in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Since the 2020 election, Mr. Trump has crusaded against mail voting, which exploded in popularity as a safe way to cast ballots during the pandemic.

Democrats flocked to mail voting in far greater numbers that year than Republicans, who were discouraged from using the practice by Mr. Trump’s sharp rhetoric. That in turn created an illusion on election night, when states typically tally in-person votes first, that Mr. Trump was ahead.

In fact, mail ballots took days and even weeks to tally in some states, and no evidence of widespread fraud emerged in any of the states where votes for Joseph R. Biden Jr. caught up to and surpassed those for Mr. Trump. The phenomenon of the “red mirage” was born.

Mr. Trump claimed there was no mirage, and he and his allies have relentlessly continued to rail against mail voting. He has called for its end outright, and sought to place significant restrictions on the process through legislation, failed executive orders and numerous court cases.

“No more crooked mail-in ballots except for illness, disability, military or travel,” Mr. Trump said during his State of the Union address last month. “None.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson joined the fray last month. “We had three House Republican candidates who were ahead on Election Day in the last election cycle, and every time a new tranche of ballots came in, they just magically whittled away until their leads were lost,” Mr. Johnson said. “It looks on its face to be fraudulent. Can I prove that? No, because it happened so far upstream.”

Mr. Trump has been transparent about his belief that changing voting laws would benefit his party.

“We’ll never lose a race in 50 years,” he said during a speech in Georgia last month, referring to passing federal voting legislation currently being debated in the Senate. He also falsely claimed without evidence that Democrats “cheat” with mailed ballots.

Such candor about his political aims has prompted Democrats, voting rights groups and some election administrators to counter that his real goal is to tip the scales of voting rules to give Republicans an advantage, to make voting more difficult or to simply continue to sow doubt about election results.

“We see this as a constant effort to basically intrude into the election process, and for this administration to figure out ways that they can discourage people from going to vote,” said Shirley Webber, the Democratic secretary of state in California. She added: “I find it somewhat ironic” that Mr. Trump had cast ballots by mail himself in the past.

Historically, changing voting rules in the middle of an election year has caused significant voter confusion, and has long been discouraged by election administrators and voting-rights authorities within the Department of Justice.

It has also produced a Supreme Court doctrine known as the Purcell principle, which discourages courts from allowing such changes when voting is imminent. Opponents of the lawsuit may argue that the principle should deter justices from tossing late deadlines.

Even laws signed well ahead of an election can have an outsize impact. In Texas in 2022, critics blamed a new, Republican-backed law featuring rigorous identification requirements for the rejection of roughly 30 percent of absentee ballots in the state’s most populous counties. The law had been enacted six months earlier.

Concerns about delayed counts — which have only grown with the proliferation of mail voting — in some cases reach beyond partisan politics.

Republicans have argued that requiring all mail ballots to be in by Election Day would help alleviate delays in results. Some Democrats and voting-rights advocates agree that weekslong counts can undermine public confidence in elections. But they say the problem isn’t only late-arriving ballots; it’s the mountain of ballots that arrive before the close of polls.

Stuart Holmes, the election director in Washington State, said an estimated 50 percent of ballots statewide — which in 2024 numbered 2 million — are typically received the final week ahead of Election Day. Late-arriving ballots in the state in 2024, by contrast, totaled about 127,000.

On Election Day, ballot drop boxes are “plum full,” Mr. Holmes said. “So those aren’t going to get processed Election Day. And the day after that, we’re still doing all of our signature verification, post-Election Day audits — all of those things contribute to a delay in results.”

Before Mr. Trump arrived on the political scene, Republicans were once the party promoting and using mail voting. The practice helped catapult the party to political dominance in Florida. And a mail voting law in Georgia was endorsed by a Republican governor and passed by a Republican-controlled legislature.

The process is still popular among Republicans in some deeply red, and particularly rural, parts of the country — raising the prospect of political peril for Mr. Trump and the G.O.P. leaders pushing the Supreme Court to act. In Nevada, a key swing state during the 2024 election, the counties with the highest mail ballot turnout were Douglas County and Nye County, according to the secretary of state’s office. Both counties voted in favor of Mr. Trump by more than 30 percentage points.

Besides Mississippi, three states with complete Republican control — Texas, West Virginia and Alaska — currently allow for some form of late-arriving ballots.

The legal argument made by the Republican National Committee could potentially apply to all late-arriving ballots, including those from the military and overseas voters. Mr. Trump has publicly called for military personnel to continue being able to cast absentee ballots by mail.

And late-arriving ballots have benefited Republicans in the past. A brief filed in the case by the Elias Law Group, a Democratic-leaning firm focused on voting rights, argues that former President George W. Bush would have lost the 2000 election had a ban on late-arriving ballots for military members been in place.

Conservatives argue that it’s simply a case of following clearly established federal law.

“If they’re told you must get your ballot in the mail a week before the election in order to guarantee that it’ll get here in time, then that’s what they’re going to do,” said Jason Snead, who leads the conservative Honest Elections Project. “They’ll respond to those changes. And I don’t think that’s a particularly difficult thing to do.”

Calculating the impact of eliminating post-election ballot deadlines is a complex task. A review by the Times last year found that in 2024, at least 725,000 ballots were postmarked by Election Day and arrived within the legally accepted post-election window, according to election officials in 14 of the 22 states and territories where late-arriving ballots were accepted that year. Four of these states — Kansas, North Dakota, Ohio and Utah — have since changed their policies and will accept only mail ballots that arrive by Election Day.

Discerning political impact is even trickier, as Democrats still far outpace Republicans in their use of mail voting. In Virginia, 73 percent of ballots that arrived after Election Day and were counted in 2024 were cast for Vice President Kamala Harris, compared with just 23 percent for Donald J. Trump. But mail ballots that arrived before Election Day had almost the same partisan breakdown.

Regardless of how the court rules, many voting rights experts do not expect Mr. Trump’s obsession with mail voting to subside — especially if Republicans lose seats in the November elections.

Said Wendy Weiser, who directs the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center, a New York nonprofit: “I think it’s all part of an effort to delegitimize elections and mail voting so as to soften the ground for efforts to try to overturn or interfere in election.”

Nick Corasaniti is a Times reporter covering national politics, with a focus on voting and elections."


The Supreme Court Could Make it Harder to Vote by Mail in the Midterms - The New York Times

Iran War Live Updates: Tehran Vows to Destroy Key Infrastructure After Trump's Power Plant Threat - The New York Times

Iran War Live Updates: Tehran Is Defiant After Trump Threatens Power Plants 

"President Trump said that he would “obliterate” Iran’s electricity plants if it did not open the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours. Iran dismissed the ultimatum as its missiles hit southern Israel, including near the country’s main nuclear research center.

Here’s the latest.

Fresh threats between Iran and the United States to attack critical civilian infrastructure risked imperiling millions of people across the Middle East, as President Trump warned that he could target Iranian power plants and Tehran vowed that such attacks would lead to retaliation against vital energy and water facilities.

Iran dismissed Mr. Trump’s ultimatum that if the Strait of Hormuz — the vital oil shipping route choked off by Iranian strikes — were not fully reopened by Monday night, the United States would strike Iranian power plants. Tehran said the strait would be “completely closed” if its energy infrastructure were attacked, as it launched new missile attacks on Israeli cities.

Iranian missiles hit Dimona, a city eight miles away from Israel’s main nuclear facility, and the nearby city of Arad on Saturday night. More than 10 people were seriously injured and dozens more sustained minor injuries, underscoring Tehran’s ability to inflict damage despite three weeks of devastating airstrikes by the United States and Israel. More than 2,000 people have been killed across the region, mostly in Iran.

The escalating threats to attack key infrastructure increased the potential for civilian danger as the war entered its fourth week.

Just days after he warned Israel against targeting Iranian energy sites to avoid an escalating cycle of counter-strikes, Mr. Trump said late Saturday that the United States would “obliterate” Iran’s power plants — which millions of Iranians depend on — within 48 hours if the strait were not reopened.

Ebrahim Zolfaghari, an Iranian military spokesman, vowed that his country would strike infrastructure used by Israel, the United States and American allies — including desalination plants that are a lifeline for much of the Middle East.

Mr. Trump’s objectives in the conflict and his plans for next steps remained unclear. On Friday, he said that the United States did not want a cease-fire with Iran, and the Pentagon dispatched more troops and warships to the region that will not arrive for weeks, but later the president wrote on social media that he was considering “winding down” operations.

Israeli officials have told the public to expect a protracted campaign. On Saturday, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, the military chief of staff, told Israelis that they were “midway through” the war with Iran and that they would still be fighting during the Passover holiday next week.

A long war of attrition could strain even Israel’s sophisticated antimissile arrays, which have faced multiple daily barrages by Iran, like the missiles that struck Saturday night.

Here’s what else to follow today:

  • Nuclear infrastructure: Iran’s state broadcaster said the strike on Dimona was intended to target the nuclear facility near the city, though U.N. officials said there was no evidence it had been damaged. The Tasnim news agency, which is affiliated with Iran’s security forces, said the missile was fired in retaliation for an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facility in Natanz on Saturday, as well as the Bushehr nuclear power plant last week.

  • Lebanon: Israel Katz, the Israeli defense minister, ordered the military to step up house demolitions in Lebanon, adding to concern that Israel could be preparing for a de facto occupation of the south of the country. Israel’s military campaign against Hezbollah has displaced more than a million people and killed over 1,000, according to the Lebanese authorities. A person was killed in northern Israel on Sunday morning in an attack by Hezbollah, the Iran-backed Lebanese armed group, the Israeli authorities said.

  • Death tolls: Iran’s U.N. ambassador has said that at least 1,348 civilians had been killed since the start of the war. On Friday, a Washington-based group, the Human Rights Activists News Agency, reported that at least 1,398 civilians had been killed. The number of Lebanese killed rose to more than 1,000, Lebanon’s health ministry said on Thursday. At least 15 people have been killed in Iranian attacks on Israel, officials have said. The American death toll stood at 13 service members.

  • Qatar crash: A Qatari helicopter crashed in the Persian Gulf because of a technical malfunction during a routing operation, killing members of the Qatari and Turkish armed forces and Turkish civilians, according to the Qatar defense minister. It was not immediately whether the crash was related to the fighting in the region.

Julian E. Barnes

Mike Waltz, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, defended President Trump’s threat to attack Iranian energy infrastructure in televised interviews on Sunday. Speaking to both Fox News and CBS News, he said that Iran’s gas-powered thermal power plants were legitimate targets, claiming that much of the country’s energy infrastructure was controlled by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, the security apparatus directly controlled by the country’s theocratic leaders.

“The president is not messing around,” Waltz told Fox’s “Sunday Morning Futures.” “He stands on his red lines, and he’s not going to allow this genocidal regime to hold the world’s energy supplies or economies hostage.”

Sanam Mahoozi

Iran responds to Trump’s energy threat with defiance and warnings of its own.

Image
A group of men in a city street.
Iran’s first vice president, Mohammad Reza Aref, center, in February.Credit...Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto, via Getty Images

Iranian officials responded defiantly on Sunday to President Trump’s threat to escalate attacks, warning that Iran would retaliate in kind if the United States or its allies widened their strikes against the country’s critical infrastructure.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran did not start this war, but it will not hesitate in defending its people and its land,” the country’s first vice president, Mohammad Reza Aref, said in a statement reported by Mehr, a semiofficial news agency. He added that Iran “will determine when and how this war will end.”

Ebrahim Zolfaghari, an Iranian military spokesman, vowed that if energy sites were attacked, Iran would target more infrastructure in the region used by Israel, the United States and American allies, including “fuel, energy, information technology and desalination infrastructure.” He added that the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil supply route, would be “completely closed” until any damaged Iranian power plants were rebuilt, in a statement reported by state-run Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, the state broadcaster.

The Iranian officials made their comments after Mr. Trump threatened in a social media post late Saturday evening to “obliterate” Iran’s power plants — on which millions of Iranians depend — if it did not fully open the strait within 48 hours. The waterway, a conduit for one-fifth of global oil shipments, has been all but closed as Iran fires strikes across the region in retaliation for the U.S.-Israeli air war that began Feb. 28.

Iran insisted that the strait was not fully closed. Ali Mousavi, Iran’s permanent representative to the International Maritime Organization, said that the waterway was “open to everyone” except Iran’s enemies. Since the start of the war, Iran has allowed some friendly countries, including China, India and Pakistan, to secure safe passage of their ships through the strait.

The United States and Israel have conducted three weeks of punishing strikes against Iran, targeting what they say are military sites, weapons stockpiles and top officials, but Iran retains the capability to inflict damage with missiles and drones. Hours before Mr. Trump’s latest warning, Iranian missiles slammed into two Israeli cities late Saturday, injuring scores of people, more than 10 of them seriously, Israeli officials said.

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the speaker of Iran’s Parliament, warned on Sunday that attacks on Iranian critical infrastructure would mean that “energy and oil facilities across the region will be considered legitimate targets and will be irreversibly destroyed.” The result, he said on social media, would be a spike in global oil prices that have already climbed by about 50 percent during the war.

Mr. Aref — who narrowly escaped being killed in an Israeli bombing this month, according to Iranian news media — said that Mr. Trump’s threats to destroy civilian infrastructure “showed the real target of these policies is directly the Iranian people themselves.”

“Attacking a nation’s vital infrastructure means a direct threat against its people and a clear violation of humanitarian principles and international law,” he said. “An attack on Iran’s infrastructure will create widespread blackouts in the region.”

Tony Romm

Energy policy reporter

Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, also appeared to downplay the urgency of an expected request to Congress for more defense funding, after the Pentagon asked the White House for $200 billionto help fund the war with Iran.

Presented with a series of clips in which congressional Republicans questioned the size of that funding package on “Meet the Press,” Bessent said the government has “plenty of money to fund this war.” Rather, Bessent said any money would be “supplemental,” allowing the administration to “make sure that the military is well supplied going forward.”

Tony Romm

Energy policy reporter

As the war with Iran sends gas prices soaring, Scott Bessent, the U.S. Treasury Secretary, maintained that Americans understand the reasons behind the short-term pain — even if he could not estimate how long it would last.

Appearing on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Bessent offered the hypothetical that “50 days of temporary, elevated prices” was a worthwhile tradeoff for “50 years of peace in the Middle East.”

Pressed on whether gas prices would indeed fall in 50 days, he continued: “I don’t know whether it’s going to be 30 days, I don’t know whether it’s going to be 50 days, I don’t know whether it’s going to be 100 days.”

Image
Credit...Eric Lee for The New York Times
Aaron Boxerman

Reporting from Jerusalem

Israel orders its military to intensify demolitions in southern Lebanon.

Image
A section of a highway covered in brown dirt and debris, flanked by green hills. A small red and white building sits on a hill in the background. Yellow flags hang from lampposts along the road.
Cars turn around on a bridge in southern Lebanon after an Israeli strike destroyed it on Sunday. Credit...Amr Abdallah Dalsh/Reuters

The Israeli defense minister said Sunday that he had ordered the military to step up its destruction of bridges and houses in southern Lebanon, bolstering fears over Israel’s efforts to expand and entrench a military-controlled buffer zone in the area.

Israel has been fighting Hezbollah, the Iran-backed Lebanese armed group, in a separate front in the wider war with Iran that began in late February. Hezbollah has fired rockets and drones at Israel, which has responded with a major military campaign in Lebanon.

More than a million people have already fled their homes in the country and over 1,000 people have been killed, according to the Lebanese government. And Israeli officials have threatened wide swathes of Lebanon’s south, telling residents there that they should leave or else their lives would be at risk amid a ground invasion they say aims to protect northern Israeli communities.

Many Lebanese fear that the Israeli assault could lead to a new occupation in parts of southern Lebanon, which Israel controlled for about two decades before withdrawing its forces in 2000.

On Sunday, Israel Katz, the Israeli defense minister, said he had ordered Israeli forces to destroy more bridges crossing the Litani River, long seen as a key demarcation point.

Mr. Katz argued that Hezbollah was using the crossings for “terrorist purposes” to bring fighters to fight Israel in the south of the country. The same routes, however, are also used by Lebanese civilians, including those seeking to flee farther north for safety.

Hours after Mr. Katz’s statement, Israeli forces bombed a bridge near Qasmiye, close to the coastal city of Tyre.

The New York Times

Mr. Katz also said he had instructed the military to accelerate the destruction of houses in some Lebanese towns near the border to “thwart threats” against Israeli communities. He suggested that the armed forces would follow methods deployed in the Gaza Strip during Israel’s two-year war with Hamas, the militant group. Huge swathes of Gaza were depopulated and razed as part of Israeli-controlled security zones inside the Palestinian enclave during the conflict.

An Israeli citizen was also killed during a Hezbollah attack earlier on Sunday, according to the Israeli authorities. Magen David Adom, the country’s emergency service, said workers had found him trapped in a burning car before confirming his death.

The recent escalation in fighting began this month, when Hezbollah launched rockets at Israel in retaliation for the killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Iranian supreme leader, in the first strikes of the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran.

Israel’s long-simmering conflict with Hezbollah has ignited into full-blown war multiple times over the past two and a half years.

After the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, started the devastating war in Gaza, Hezbollah began shooting rockets and drones at Israel in solidarity with its Palestinian allies.

The fighting escalated the following year, and Israel killed Hezbollah’s longtime leader, Hassan Nasrallah, forcing the group to accept a cease-fire. Despite the truce, Israel continued to bomb Hezbollah fighters, leaders, and military sites in an effort to degrade the group’s forces.

Badly battered by the fighting, Hezbollah did not respond militarily. But the group also refused exhortations by the Lebanese government and international pressure to lay down its weapons.

Gabby Sobelman

Reporting from Rehovot, Israel

The Israeli military said it was bombarding sites affiliated with Hezbollah throughout southern Lebanon. Earlier on Sunday, an Israeli citizen was killed by Hezbollah fire on an Israeli border town, according to the Israeli authorities, raising the civilian toll in Israel since the war started in February to at least 15.

Sanam Mahoozi

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the speaker of Iran’s Parliament, appeared to rebuff President Trump’s threat on Saturday to attack Iranian power plants unless the Strait of Hormuz is opened within 48 hours. If Iran’s infrastructure was attacked, Ghalibaf said on social media, “energy and oil facilities across the region will be considered legitimate targets and will be irreversibly destroyed.” 

Sarah Chaayto

Reporting from Beirut, Lebanon

The Israeli military announced it is preparing to bomb the Qassmiye bridge, a major bridge in southern Lebanon, where it has also ordered civilians to flee their homes. Israeli officials have justified the attacks on the bridge, part of the fastest route from Beirut to southern Lebanon, by saying that Hezbollah is using these bridges to send fighters and weapons to the south to fight Israel. But the routes are also used by ordinary Lebanese, raising questions about the impact on civilians.

Image
Credit...Amr Abdallah Dalsh/Reuters
Vivian Nereim

Reporting from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The United Arab Emirates’ defense ministry reported four ballistic missile and 25 drone attacks from Iran today. It did not report any new deaths in the country.

Aaron Boxerman

Reporting from Jerusalem

The Iranian missile strikes in the cities of Dimona and Arad on Saturday night underlined the dilemma Israel faces between preserving relative normalcy in the country and protecting civilians from attacks. Last week, Israel’s military signed off on reopening schools in parts of the country — including both Dimona and Arad — due to reduced Iranian missile fire. Early Sunday morning, the military reversed that decision, again shuttering schools across the country for safety reasons.

Image
Credit...Amit Elkayam for The New York Times
Vivian Nereim

Reporting from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

A bulk carrier vessel off the coast of Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates reported an explosion from an unknown projectile late Saturday night, according to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center. The agency said that all crew members were reported to be safe.

Johnatan Reiss

Reporting from Arad and Dimona, Israel

Residents of Arad are shaken after an Iranian missile strike.

Image
People wearing orange hard hats and safety vests stand among rubble after a building was destroyed in a missile strike.
Emergency workers at a site of a missile strike in Dimona, Israel on Sunday.Credit...Amit Elkayam for The New York Times

Shards of glass and charred debris littered the streets of Arad and Dimona on Sunday morning, hours after missiles from Iran struck residential neighborhoods in these small desert cities in southern Israel.

The blast in Arad on Saturday night carved out a crater of sand and twisted metal in a grassy courtyard and shattered windows more than half a mile away, according to residents. In Dimona, a missile smashed into a sandy yard between several apartment buildings.

About 175 people were injured in the two strikes, at least 10 of them seriously, according to the emergency and health services. There were no fatalities. 

Dimona and Arad are the closest cities to Israel’s main nuclear research installation and reactor, one of the most guarded sites in Israel. Neither had been directly hit before, including in more than two years of wars in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran, according to local officials.

Yitzhak Salem, 62, was sheltering with his wife in a fortified safe room in his home in Dimona when the blast filled the room with dust and smoke. “It felt like a hurricane mixed with an earthquake,” he said. 

The mayor of Dimona, Benny Biton, told Israeli news media that many residents in the destroyed buildings had avoided injury because they had made it to bomb shelters after receiving alerts of incoming missile fire.

In Arad, a city of roughly 30,000 people in the Negev Desert, three four-story apartment blocks closest to the impact site were set to be demolished, according to Kfir Levy, a spokesman for Arad’s city hall.

Residents from surrounding buildings trickled in on Sunday morning to inspect the damage and try to collect their belongings. Some saw their hollowed-out homes for the first time.

Many of the 80 or so people wounded in Arad were not inside a shelter when the missile hit, Mr. Levy said. Among them were many older residents who struggle to descend multiple flights of stairs when warning sirens sound, he said. 

Image
A sandy crater with the ruins of buildings in the background.
The aftermath of a missile strike on a neighborhood in Arad, Israel, on Sunday.Credit...Amit Elkayam for The New York Times

Mike Getner, 45, a taxi driver who lives several blocks from the impact site in Arad, said the blast that followed the siren at roughly 10 p.m. felt like nothing he had experienced in his city before.

“The house shook, you could feel the blinds shudder, you felt the ground shaking,” he said. “You could tell it was right here.”

Isaac Waxler, a store owner who lives a block away from the impact site, said he was sheltering at home with his wife when they heard the blast. His son and eight grandchildren live in the buildings that surround the impact site.

“It was a terror,” Mr. Waxler said, describing the moments he tried to reach his son. His son managed to tell him he was OK before the lines went down, Mr. Waxler said. The family of 10 then moved to Mr. Waxler’s house to spend the night. 

Aaron Boxerman

Reporting from Jerusalem

Israel Katz, the Israeli defense minister, said he had ordered the military to accelerate the demolition of houses in Lebanese towns close to the border. Israel has been carving out a military-controlled buffer zone inside Lebanese territory, which many Lebanese fear could become a renewed de facto occupation in the south of the country. In a statement, Katz said he had ordered the demolitions “along the lines of Rafah and Beit Hanoun” — two Gazan cities which were largely razed by Israeli forces during the two year war in the Palestinian enclave.

Image
Credit...Odd Andersen/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Aaron Boxerman

Reporting from Jerusalem

Israel’s defense minister announced that he ordered the country’s military to immediately destroy more bridges over the Litani River in southern Lebanon, part of an Israeli military campaign against Hezbollah that has displaced more than a million people in Lebanon. Israel Katz, the minister, said he had given the order to prevent Hezbollah from moving militants closer to the border with Israel in the country’s south.

 Sanam Mahoozi

Iran has entered its 23rd day of an internet blackout, according to the internet monitoring group NetBlocks. On the second day of the Persian New Year, many families and friends remain unable to communicate. But individuals affiliated with the authorities in Iran, who have access to privileged “white SIM” services, appear to still have access to the internet and social media, experts said. 

Abdi Latif DahirDiego Ibarra Sanchez

Abdi Latif Dahir and 

Reporting from Beirut, Lebanon

LEBANON DISPATCH

On Beirut’s waterfront, loss meets life, and luxury, amid war.

Image
A man with short hair and a beard sits on a blanket next to the sea. More blankets are laid out nearby, and a water jug is behind him.
A displaced man in Beirut, Lebanon, sitting near the sea. More than a million people have been displaced in the country since the latest conflict between Israel and Hezbollah began.

The shirtless jogger, his headphones in and his back slick with sweat, ran past a row of tents pitched along the seafront in downtown Beirut, Lebanon’s capital. In one tent, a displaced family of four — uprooted by weeks of war that have convulsed the nation — watched him pass.

For a moment, the scene held its uneasy calm. The evening sun faded into the Mediterranean Sea, the steady rhythm of the waves softened the edges of the day, and the runner kept his pace, eyes forward. And then a deafening roar shattered it all: An Israeli airstrike had hit a nearby neighborhood, sending plumes of smoke into the sky.

“We chose the seaside because it is peaceful,” said Hussein Hame, 37, who, along with his wife and two children, was displaced this month from Dahiya, a collection of neighborhoods on the southern outskirts of Beirut where Hezbollah holds sway. “But this war finds you everywhere.”

War has returned to Lebanon, and the capital’s meandering seafront has become an unlikely front line. Here, a stark contrast has emerged: The displaced and destitute sit in the cold, while others live life as usual — jogging, cycling — amid the dizzying wealth and luxury that exist nearby.

Image
Several people sleeping in a car with two large yellow bags on top of the trunk. Other cars are nearby, and several arches and trees stand in the background.
Displaced people sleeping in a car near Beirut’s waterfront. Since the war began, many have fled the city’s southern suburbs, as well as other parts of Lebanon.
Image
A woman wearing a blue top and pants pauses after running. Several tents and streetlights are in the background.
A runner resting near the seafront, where some people have set up tents for shelter. 

In early March, Israel unleashed a barrage of attacks on Lebanon after the Iran-backed proxy group Hezbollah fired rockets at northern Israel following the U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran. The violence has uprooted more than a million people, with Israel issuing evacuation warnings across much of southern Lebanon and in parts of Beirut and the eastern Bekaa Valley. Israel’s strikes have killed more than 1,000 people, injured more than 2,700 and put Lebanon, once again, on the precipice of disaster.

On the city’s seafront, the human toll is visible in stark detail: Tents line the promenade, cars serve as makeshift shelters and bundles of clothes scatter the sidewalks. Teenagers, with nowhere to go and no school to attend, roam around. Toddlers, hungry and exhausted, cry and fuss.

Families huddle through cold nights, lighting small bonfires that do little against the wind and rain. There is nowhere to shower, nowhere to change, barely enough to eat — especially difficult for those who were fasting during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

The displaced form a mosaic of Lebanon itself: locals uprooted from homes, businesses and farmlands. But there are also foreigners, many of whom are domestic workers and day laborers. They arrived from Africa, Asia and across the Middle East in search of better economic opportunities and safety only to find uncertainty.

A week into the fighting, an Israeli strike hit several cars along the seaside corniche, killing at least eight people and injuring dozens more, health officials said.

But even as suffering persists along the waterfront, a different reality unfolds beside it.

Image
A large plume of smoke rises over an urban area with densely packed buildings.
Smoke rising above Dahiya, the densely packed southern outskirts of Beirut that many people fled after Israel issued mass evacuation warnings.
Image
Several people sleeping outside under blankets on a path next to a body of water. A metal barrier and several boats overturned on land are behind them.
Sheltering along the seaside corniche in Beirut. More than a million people in Lebanon have been displaced.

From the corniche, the city opens to a breathtaking panorama: the glittering Mediterranean, the rugged peaks of Mount Lebanon and the iconic Raouché Rocks rising from the sea.

The promenade is also one of the city’s most affluent stretches, lined with upscale apartments and hotels, luxury car dealerships and swanky restaurants with well-heeled patrons sipping cocktails. Those displaced share the same stretch with cyclists, joggers in sleek athletic wear, families out for evening strolls and fishermen casting lines from the rocks below.

On a recent afternoon, Vera Noon, who was walking along the seafront, described a swell of conflicting emotions. Some people moved along the corniche, walking their dogs and laughing as if nothing had changed, seemingly untouched by the surrounding suffering. And yet, she said, she understood that people were navigating the crisis in their own ways.

“They didn’t choose this war,” said Ms. Noon, a Lebanese doctoral student at the University of Edinburgh who is researching the connection between the Mediterranean and her country’s heritage.

The seafront, she said, offers a sanctuary for both those clinging to daily routines and those with nowhere else to go.

“The sea is the last refuge,” Ms. Noon said. “It gives people peace. They relax, it gives them calm.”

Image
Many people stand outside preparing meals. One man holds a large bowl of food, and several cars and tents are nearby.
Volunteers preparing meals for displaced people staying along Beirut’s waterfront.
Image
A man dumps a bucket of water on himself on a beach. A volleyball net stands nearby, and tall buildings rise in the background.
A man showering after playing volleyball in the Ramlet al-Baida neighborhood. An Israeli strike this month hit several cars along the corniche, killing at least eight people and injuring dozens more, the authorities said.

The Beirut seafront is no stranger to war.

In April 1973, Israeli commandos departed from this coastline after targeting members of the Palestinian Fatah organization who were operating in the city. In August 1982, an image of coastal buildings ablaze after Israeli bombardment appeared on the cover of Time magazine. During the 15-year civil war that ended in 1990, the waterfront was lined with bullet-scarred buildings.

In the years that followed, the area was rebuilt, most notably by the private development company Solidere, led by former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, which reshaped downtown Beirut with high-rise buildings and commercial projects. That transformation came at a cost: Cafes, hotels and beach clubs privatized large stretches of the shore, putting access out of reach for many.

Even so, the public never fully let go. Activists organized campaigns, protests and legal challenges to preserve access to the sea.

At the same time, crises kept coming. A financial collapse in 2019 fueled an antigovernment revolt that pushed crowds demanding change onto the waterfront. In 2020, an explosion at Beirut’s porttore through the city, killing hundreds and devastating entire neighborhoods. Then came war with Israel in 2024, once again driving people toward the seafront in search of refuge.

Now, with conflict returning, many like Gizelle Hassoun, a 52-year-old bar owner, say they feel exhausted and detached — and are drawn back to the waterfront for a fleeting touch of normality.

“We are all in a state of bala mokh,” said Ms. Hassoun, using an Arabic phrase that literally means “no brain” but colloquially describes being mentally drained and numb.

Image
People sleeping outside beneath blankets on concrete next to a grassy area. The sun peeks through foliage next to city buildings.
Many of the displaced who came to the corniche have been sleeping outside. Nearby, the promenade is lined with upscale apartments and hotels, luxury car dealerships and swanky restaurants. 
Image
A man wearing a black jacket and pants sits between two motorbikes and next to a makeshift shelter with blankets hung up.
A displaced man sitting next to his tent on the corniche. He and his family fled the southern suburbs of Beirut in early March.

During the 2024 war, she said, she and those around her rushed to help the displaced along the waterfront whose homes and businesses had been destroyed. This time, she was spent, and the famed Lebanese resilience that usually carried her was gone.

When the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah began on March 2, she didn’t bother to stock up or fill her car’s tank.

“This is sad, but maybe we’ve gotten too used to this,” she said, strolling along the seafront with a friend as the buzz of an Israeli drone cut through the air.

Not everyone coming to the waterfront carries the same weariness.

Mohammed Ismail has been returning to this stretch of Beirut’s coast for more than a decade. Usually, he lives in Dahiya, the Hezbollah stronghold that has been evacuated, and runs an electronics store there. But even since fleeing, he has made sure to come to the waterfront.

On a recent afternoon, he sat tanning in the sun, reading the Quran open in his lap as he fasted for Ramadan. It was the second time he had been displaced in less than two years. His mind sometimes wandered to hardship, he said, but he was trying to carry on as normally as he could.

Nearby, a group played padel, others smoked and chatted, and some exercised. For a fleeting moment, life felt ordinary.

“This is the best place to remove the stress from your life,” he said.

Image
A man sits outside shirtless, leaning against a low wall, while reading a book open in his lap. City buildings stand in the background.
Mohammed Ismail reading the Quran while fasting. Beirut’s waterfront is “the best place to remove the stress from your life,” he said.
Image
Several people stand outside as a plume of smoke rises above buildings in the distance. One woman smiles while taking a mattress from a man.
Displaced people staying near the corniche picking up mattresses as smoke from an airstrike on central Beirut rose in the distance. 

On some days, the tranquillity of the beach masks a deadly reality.

In mid-March, Israeli airstrikes tore through several cars along the corniche in the Ramlet al-Baida neighborhood, splattering the sidewalk with bloodied sand. Just days before, a suite in the four-star Ramada Plaza Hotel farther down the seafront was hit. Israel says its attacks are aimed at reaching Hezbollah operatives and their Iranian backers.

For those taking shelter along the waterfront, like Mr. Hame and his family, life now swings between dread and relief. The night that Ramlet al-Baida beach was struck, his children panicked and leaped onto him inside their tent. He held them and tried to calm them, he said. When that failed, he raced them on his motorcycle to a church east of Beirut where displaced people were offered shelter.

They stayed there for the morning, but soon after, he said, the children insisted on returning to the shore.

Vivian Nereim

Reporting from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

A Qatari helicopter crashed in the Persian Gulf due to a technical malfunction during a routine operation, killing seven, according to statements from the country’s defense and interior ministries. Four were members of the Qatari armed forces, one was from Qatar and Turkey’s joint forces, and two were Turkish “civilian collaborators.”

 Sanam Mahoozi

Iran pushed back against claims that it had effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, saying that the vital oil supply route was only shuttered to the country’s enemies. Ali Mousavi, Iran’s permanent representative to the International Maritime Organization, said that the strait was “open to everyone” except Iran’s adversaries, hours after President Trump on Saturday threatened to attack Iranian power plants if the waterway was not fully opened in the next two days.

Aaron Boxerman

Reporting from Jerusalem

A person was killed in an Israeli town near the country’s northern border after fire from Lebanon, where Israeli forces have been fighting the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah, according to Israel’s emergency rescue service. The Israeli military said the attack had caused damage and casualties and was under review. At least 14 people have been killed in Israel since the war with Iran began last month.

Yan Zhuang

Israel’s military said on Sunday morning that its defense systems were responding to missiles launched from Iran. Shortly afterward, it said that emergency teams were heading to a site in central Israel following reports of a strike. It did not provide further details.

Yan Zhuang

Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Defense said it intercepted a ballistic missile launched toward Riyadh, its capital, while two others fell in an uninhabited area. It did not say where the missiles originated.

Pranav Baskar

Israel’s emergency rescue service said it treated 115 patients after Iranian missiles struck Dimona and Arad, including 11 in serious condition. In Arad, where most of the serious injuries occurred, paramedics described a scene of “extensive destruction” and “chaos” according to the rescue service. In Dimona, where one person was seriously injured, paramedics reported damage to residential structures and people who were trapped inside buildings.

Image
Credit...Amit Elkayam for The New York Times
Pranav Baskar

Iranian state news agencies also carried a warning from the country’s armed forces that if Iran’s fuel and energy infrastructure is attacked, Tehran will target all energy infrastructure belonging to U.S. and Israeli allies in the region. The claim appeared to respond to President Trump’s threat on social media on Saturday evening that he would “obliterate” Iran’s power plants if the country does not fully open the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours.

David E. Sanger

White House reporter

President Trump, who days ago publicly called on Israel to avoid targeting Iranian energy sites for fear of triggering an escalating cycle of counterstrikes, threatened to hit Iran’s power plants if it did not “FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz” within 48 hours. He said that American strikes on Iranian plants would start “WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST.”

Iran’s largest plant appears to be its only operating nuclear power plant, at Bushehr. For decades, nuclear power plants have been considered off limits because of the obvious risk of environmental catastrophe. The U.S. has led efforts to keep Russia and Ukraine from firing near the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Bushehr is fueled by Russian-provided uranium and monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency. It is not considered part of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. The spent fuel is returned to Russia.

Pranav Baskar

Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, the state broadcaster, said that the Iranian missile strike on the city of Dimona was intended to target Israel’s nuclear facilities there. The report appears to be the first confirmation from Iran that Israel’s nuclear facilities — which were not damaged, according to the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog — were the focus of the attack.

Eve Sampson

Israel’s military said early Sunday that it had begun a new wave of strikes on Tehran, targeting Iranian infrastructure.

Pranav Baskar

Iranian missile strikes Israeli city near main nuclear research facility.

Image
Three people in emergency gear move toward a destroyed building at night. Spotlights illuminate broken structures and debris.
Emergency workers approach a site where Iranian missiles struck Dimona, Israel on Saturday.Credit...Ilan Assayag/Reuters

An Iranian missile penetrated Israeli defenses on Saturday and injured over 40 people in a southern Israeli city eight miles from the country’s main nuclear research facility, according to Israel’s emergency rescue services. There was no evidence that the nuclear site had been damaged in the attack, U.N. officials said.

The Tasnim news agency, which is affiliated with Iran’s security forces, reported that the missile, which hit a residential area in the small city of Dimona, was fired in retaliation for airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facility in Natanz on Saturday and on the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant on Tuesday.

The Israeli military has denied attacking the Natanz facility, and the U.S. military declined to comment.

A second missile caused damage in Arad, a city about 25 miles northeast of Dimona, leaving at least seven people seriously injured, according to Israel’s emergency services agency, Magen David Adom. Teams were searching for other casualties.

“This has been a very difficult evening in the battle for our future,” the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said in a post on X.

Dimona is a sensitive target because it sits so close to the Shimon Peres Negev Nuclear Research Center, thought by researchers to be connected to Israel’s nuclear weapons program, which the country has not publicly acknowledged.

After the strike, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said it had not received any indication of damage to the nuclear research center. The agency called for “maximum restraint” on military strikes in the vicinity of nuclear facilities.

The Israeli military said it had unsuccessfully tried to intercept the missile before it struck and had opened an investigation into what went wrong.

At least two people were wounded, according to Magen David Adom. A 10-year-old boy was listed in “serious” condition with shrapnel injuries, and a woman had “moderate” injuries from glass fragments. The others had only mild injuries.

David E. Sanger

David E. Sanger has covered five American presidents. He writes often on the intersection of technology and national security, and the revival of superpower conflict, the subject of his latest book.

NEWS ANALYSIS

Trump is finally eyeing an exit from Iran. But will he take it?

Image
The repercussions of President Trump’s “excursion” into Iran may outlast his interest in it.Credit...Al Drago for The New York Times

Ever since President Trump began what he now delicately calls his “excursion” into Iran, Washington has been consumed by the question of when he would call it a day — even if many of his war goals remain unaccomplished.

On Friday evening, as he headed to Florida, Mr. Trump seemed to be designing that much-discussed exit. But he clearly has not yet decided whether to take it.

And there is mounting evidence — average gas price approaching $4 a gallon, infrastructure in ruins across the Persian Gulf, a decimated Iranian theocracy digging in and American allies at first rebuffing and now struggling with demands to patrol hostile waters — that the repercussions of Mr. Trump’s excursion may outlast his interest in it.

As always, Mr. Trump’s messaging is inconsistent, which his critics cite as evidence that he entered this conflict with no strategy and his followers cheer as strategic ambiguity. With thousands of additional Marines headed to the region and the pace of American and Israeli attacks quickening, Mr. Trump told reporters on Friday he had no interest in a cease-fire because the United States was “obliterating” Iran’s missile stocks, navy, air force and defense industrial base.

Hours later, perhaps sensitive to a Republican base understandably nervous about the political effects, he posted on his social media site that “we are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great Military efforts in the Middle East.”

But his latest list of those objectives left out a few of his previous goals and watered down others. He made no mention of defeating the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, which appears to remain in power, along with Mojtaba Khamenei, who has succeeded his father as supreme leader, though he has yet to be seen or heard in public. Mr. Trump also omitted any message to the Iranian people, whom he told only three weeks ago: “When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take.”

And after insisting in the failed negotiations that led up to the war that Iran had to ship all of its nuclear material out of the country — starting with the 970 pounds of enriched uranium that are closest to bomb-grade — he suggested a new goal. “Never allowing Iran to get even close to Nuclear Capability,” he wrote, “and always being in a position where the U.S.A. can quickly and powerfully react to such a situation.”

Image
The site of a U.S.-Israeli airstrike in Tehran on Saturday.Credit...Arash Khamooshi for The New York Times

That is, essentially, where the United States was after it buried Iran’s nuclear program in rubble last June. The sites have remained under the watchful eye of U.S. spy satellites.

Mr. Trump ended the posting with a new demand for American allies, whom he had frozen out of his deliberations before starting the war, and gave no warning to prepare for its consequences. “The Hormuz Strait will have to be guarded and policed, as necessary, by other Nations who use it — the United States does not!” American forces would help, he said.

“Think of it as the new Trump Doctrine for the Middle East,” Richard N. Haass, the former president of the Council on Foreign Relations, who served on the National Security Council and at the State Department during the Persian Gulf War and the Iraq war, wrote on social media.

“We broke it, but you own it.”

Mr. Trump’s shifting goals continued into Saturday evening. Just a few days ago, he was calling on Israel to avoid targeting Iranian energy sites, for fear it would lead to an escalating round of retaliatory counter-strikes across the Gulf. But on Saturday, he threatened to hit Iran’s power plants if it did not “FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz” within 48 hours.

He said that U.S. strikes on Iranian plants would start “WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST.” Iran’s biggest plant appears to be its only operating nuclear power plant, at Bushehr. For decades, nuclear power plants have been considered completely off limits for strikes because of the obvious risk of environmental calamity.

This is not where Mr. Trump expected to be after three weeks of war.

Foreign leaders, diplomats and U.S. officials who have spoken with the president said that in the first week he voiced expectations that Iran would capitulate. That was clear in Mr. Trump’s demand on March 6 for Iran’s “unconditional surrender.”

The demand was mystifying, said one European diplomat with long experience dealing with Iran, given the country’s competing power centers, its national pride and a Persian state that has existed within the rough boundaries of modern-day Iran, enduring many rises and falls, since the days of Cyrus the Great around 550 B.C.

(That demand was also missing from his latest set of objectives. The White House has since said that the president does not expect a surrender announcement from Iran, but that Mr. Trump will determine when Iran has “effectively surrendered.”)

Iran’s refusal to “cry uncle,’’ as Mr. Trump termed it to reporters on Air Force One, has been only one of the surprises to the president in recent weeks.

The first was the crisis in the energy markets, which the International Energy Agency has called “the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market.” It has sent Mr. Trump and his aides scrambling. They have promised releases from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which was only 60 percent full, reflecting a lack of planning. Over the past week the Treasury Department has issued licenses for the delivery of Russian and Iranian oil already at sea. In other words, to calm the markets, the president has approved enriching an adversary that is at war with Ukraine, an American ally, and another that is at war with the United States.

So far, the effects are minimal. Brent crude closed at around $112 a barrel on Friday after the Treasury announcements, and Goldman Sachs warned on Thursday that if ships were reluctant to make their way through the Strait of Hormuz, prices could remain high into 2027.

The Iranians clearly understand that market chaos is their one remaining superweapon. On Saturday, Tehran warned it could set fire to other facilities in the Middle East. The United States believes the country entered the war with 3,000 or so sea mines — some of which are believed to have been destroyed — and the United States has focused on destroying small boats in the Iranian fleet that are targeting tankers associated with American allies.

Image
Cargo ships in the Persian Gulf on Thursday, heading toward the Strait of Hormuz. Credit...Associated Press

“All it takes is for one of those things to get through to shut down traffic,” said John F. Kirby, who served as both Pentagon and State Department spokesman after retiring as a naval officer. “The fear alone can be paralyzing to the shipping industry, as we have already seen.”

Mr. Trump’s second surprise was his sudden need for allies. He didn’t imagine it at the beginning of the conflict, the defense minister of one Gulf nation said recently, because he thought the war would be short. But patrolling the strait, and other checkpoints, appears to be a task that could last months or years.

His third surprise was the absence of any uprising among either the Revolutionary Guards or ordinary Iranians. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in the Oval Office this past week “we are seeing defections at all levels as they’re starting to sense what’s going on with the regime.” But American and European intelligence officials say they have no evidence of such defections — even after Israel targeted, and eliminated, Iran’s supreme leader, its top security and intelligence chiefs and many top military officials.

All that could yet come. Wars are not won or lost in three weeks. But Mr. Trump entered the Iran war after enjoying the fruits of quick victories. A bombing run over Iran’s three major nuclear sites in June was a one-evening expedition, essentially burying the country’s nuclear stockpiles and wiping out thousands of its centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium.

The commando raid to seize Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela from his bed in Caracas was similarly swift. And so far, the government Mr. Trump left in place — essentially Mr. Maduro’s government — has been compliant. That operation has helped Mr. Trump destabilize Cuba, which has lost the Venezuelan fuel supplies that it has long depended on. The other day the electric grid in Cuba collapsed, and administration officials have been openly suggesting that the government will, too.

Perhaps those quick results encouraged Mr. Trump to believe the U.S. military was all-powerful, and that the mullahs and generals and militias that run Iran, a country of 92 million people, would crumble. Perhaps he rushed.

Military historians will be dissecting this conflict for a long time. But for now it is clear that Iran is a different kind of challenge. Mr. Trump started using the word “excursion” to suggest this is just a short trip, a brief diversion. But there is no real end in sight.

Julian E. BarnesEric Schmitt

Julian E. Barnes and 

Reporting from Washington

Iranian attempted missile attack 2,500 miles away raises questions about the reach of its arsenal.

Image
Diego Garcia, the site of a joint British-U.S. military base, seen in a U.S. Navy handout photo.Credit...U.S. Navy, via Reuters

Iran’s attempted missile attack on Friday on a joint U.S.-British military base in the Indian Ocean, 2,500 miles away, immediately prompted questions of how far Tehran’s weapons can reach.

Before the current war on Iran, President Trump raised similar fears, noting in his State of the Union address that Iran was “working to build missiles that will soon reach the United States of America.”

But for now, Iran’s missiles cannot reach the United States, and as the failed strike on the military base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean demonstrated, the farther Iran fires, the less reliable its missiles and the less accurate its attacks become.

Iran fired two missiles at Diego Garcia, said a U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity. One failed mid-flight and the other was shot down by an American warship. The official added that the launch had surprised the United States because of its range.

Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, the Israeli military chief of staff, discussed the missile attack on Diego Garcia in a video statement on Saturday night, saying Iran had fired a “two-stage intercontinental ballistic missile with a range of 4,000 kilometers” at “an American target” on the island on Friday. He did not elaborate, except to say that the attack underscored that Iran’s military capabilities could threaten Europe, not just Israel.

The strike came before the announcement that Britain would allow the United States expanded use of its bases, including at Diego Garcia. A senior Western military official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the attack may indicate that Iran is trying to force the United States to spread out its defenses, and not merely focus on defending bases in the Middle East.

Tom Karako, the director of the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said the 2,500-mile distance was “beyond what we and they usually advertise” as the range of Iranian missiles.

“Iran has made its missile program a top priority for many years, and have displayed solid rocket motor plans,” Mr. Karako said. “It’s not a surprise that hard work yielded more substantial capability than some of the more optimistic publicly stated estimates. This is one reason why the United States and our European friends have been deploying missile defenses for quite a while now.”

Martín González Gómez/The New York Times

The United States has missile-defense facilities in Romania and Poland that are nominally meant to address the threat of Iranian missiles.

A report by the Defense Intelligence Agency last year concluded that Iran did not have ballistic missiles capable of hitting the United States, and that it might take as long as a decade for it to have up to 60 intercontinental ballistic missiles.

At a Senate hearing this week, Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, affirmed the D.I.A. report that suggested Iranian intercontinental ballistic missile development was years away.

But others have estimated a shorter timeline.

Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas and the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said he feared Iran could make a functioning ICBM in six months if it paired its space launch technology with its medium-range missile technology.

John Ratcliffe, the director of the C.I.A., said Mr. Cotton was right to be concerned. He said if Iran was unimpeded it would be able to develop missiles that could threaten the continental United States, though he did not cite a time frame for such a development.

“It is one of the reasons why degrading Iran’s missile production capabilities that is taking place right now in Operation Epic Fury is so important to our national security,” Mr. Ratcliffe said.

Other experts cautioned that it was hard to draw many conclusions about Iran’s capabilities until more is known about the type of missile that was fired. But Nicholas Carl, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute’s Critical Threats Project, said it affirmed Iran’s ability to fire beyond 1,200 miles with its current capabilities.

“That upends some of the assumptions that many have long had about the Iranian threat,” Mr. Carl said. “Even if Iran cannot reliably hit precise targets at that range, this raises the question of whether it can reach that far with cluster munition warheads, which it has fired repeatedly at Israel in order to maximize collateral damage and terrorize civilians — rather than to destroy discrete military targets.”

Aaron Boxermanin Jerusalem contributed reporting."

Iran War Live Updates: Tehran Vows to Destroy Key Infrastructure After Trump's Power Plant Threat - The New York Times