Contact Me By Email

Contact Me By Email

Saturday, March 07, 2026

Pam Bondi’s in trouble with Republicans on Capitol Hill

 

Pam Bondi’s in trouble with Republicans on Capitol Hill

The attorney general will soon have to appear before a House committee under subpoena.

“Bondi is under intense scrutiny for her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. As many as 20 Republicans might be prepared to back an effort to render punishment against the nation’s top prosecutor for slowwalking the materials’ release, according to the Democrat helping lead the charge. And five Republicans joined with Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Wednesday to subpoena her testimony.President Donald Trump is joined by Attorney General Pam Bondi and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem during a roundtable.

“Attorney General Pam Bondi has worked tirelessly to successfully implement the President’s law and order agenda,” Jackson said in a statement. “The President has full faith in the Attorney General.”

Justice Department spokesperson Natalie Baldassarre in a statement extolled what the attorney general has done to deliver transparency in the Epstein case and comply with the bill passed by Congress that mandated the files’ release. She said those lawmakers who remain critical of the administration “refuse to accept the truth.”

“These members know we are not hiding anything, and their laughable antics to score cheap political points at the expense of victims will not sway our mission to uphold the rule of law and keep the American people safe,” said Baldassarre, who also provided a bulleted list of “DOJ Wins” and a handful of quotes from Congressional Republicans lauding the attorney general.

And to be sure, Noem’s situation was unique. She oversaw an agency whose federal immigration enforcement agents shot and killed two U.S. citizens in Minnesota, faced questions about whether she spent hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars on a self-promotional ad campaign and clashed with border czar Tom Homan.

But Noem’s back-to-back disastrous congressional hearings this past week laid bare the extreme lack of confidence among Republicans in the outgoing secretary’s leadership, and revealed the extent to which Trump can be influenced by the sentiment of lawmakers in his party. For Bondi, the situation is becoming increasingly dire.

Asked whether he believed Bondi continued to have support among House Republicans, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), who voted to subpoena Bondi in committee, responded, “I don’t know.”

“I just think it’s time to get some answers,” he added. “She’s in the batter’s box. I’d say … let her hit.”

Democrats are also preparing to train all their attention on Bondi now that Noem is no longer a top political target.

In a news conference Thursday, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Bondi and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller — an architect of the Trump administration’s aggressive immigration enforcement agenda — have “got to go.”

“We’re going to approach those two toxic individuals with the same intensity that has now led to the termination of Kristi Noem,” Jeffries added.

Bondi is not the only other high ranking administration official who remains under the microscope on the Hill. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is also facing calls from Democrats to resign for not previously disclosing the full extent of his ties to Epstein, though he has not been charged with any wrongdoing.

One House Republican, Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina, had plans to formally call for an Oversight Committee vote to subpoena his testimony — an outcome Lutnick preempted by announcing he would sit for a transcribed interview with members of the panel voluntarily.

Bondi, however, has absorbed the brunt of GOP ire. For months, her handling of the case against convicted sex offender Epstein has spurred outrage from a swath of the MAGA base, which clamored for years for the federal government to release the case materials in its possession and begin to hold powerful people to account for their crimes.

The DOJ’s decision last July to withhold further Epstein-related information, even after Bondi at one point boasted about having Epstein’s so-called client list on her desk, prompted an all-out revolt in Congress. It culminated in the passage of legislation, co-sponsored by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), forcing the department to make all the files public.

Under Bondi’s leadership, the DOJ ultimately blew past the statutory deadline to comply with the new law. Officials later claimed the department had fulfilled all its obligations, despite withholding case files and making redactions that appeared to go beyond the scope of what the bill permitted.

“I’m not impressed with Bondi on the Epstein files, and I’ll make that abundantly clear when I depose her whenever that day comes,” said Mace, who brought the motion in the Oversight hearing Wednesday to subpoena the attorney general. “She’s lost a lot of support among the base [and] up here as well.”

Senior House Republicans have since last summer been perplexed and often alarmed by Bondi’s handling of the Epstein matter, with even some members of Speaker Mike Johnson’s leadership team privately arguing her decisions fueled the House GOP rebellion over the Epstein case, according to four people granted anonymity to share direct knowledge of the situation.

GOP leaders now are aware that Bondi could stir more fallout on the Hill if she testifies as expected. One senior Republican, granted anonymity to speak candidly, described her judgement as “not good on Epstein,” adding, “it certainly hasn’t helped us.”

Among the potential political liabilities for Bondi: an ongoing bipartisan effort to try to hold her in inherent contempt. Such a measure, which has not been deployed successfully in decades, would allow the House to impose its own punishment on Bondi — including potentially permitting the chamber’s sergeant-at-arms to take her into custody.

Khanna said he and Massie had discussed that they would have “20 Republicans who may be open to a contempt filing if she doesn’t release more files … I do believe she’s in trouble.”

Under pressure, the Justice Department released more Epstein files late Thursday, including witness interviews with a woman who claimed she was sexually assaulted by Trump when she was young. The president has denied any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein and has not been charged with a crime, and the White House has said the accusations are baseless and lack credibility.

Oversight Democrats had previously announced they were looking into the potential withholding of those specific materials containing the woman’s allegation. None indicated Friday the department’s actions were satisfactory.

“The world is watching as Pam Bondi continues to aid this White House cover-up,” said the panel’s top Democrat, Rep. Robert Garcia of California, in a statement Friday morning. “We look forward to having her testify under oath before the Oversight Committee as soon as possible.”

Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said his members are “trying to get an update” on where the DOJ stands with the Epstein files. Asked whether Bondi is on shaky ground, he said, “I have no idea. You’ll have to ask the president.”

Still, some House Republicans insist Bondi maintains broad support within their conference and that the Oversight members are outliers who don’t represent the consensus view of the party.

“There are several members of that committee that are perhaps seeking higher office,” said Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas). “I don’t know if intentions are always pure.”

Mace is running for governor. The other four who voted to subpoena Bondi — Burchett and Reps. Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania and Michael Cloud of Texas — are seeking reelection to the House.

Their actions also suggest they are making a broader political calculation — that their voters see the Epstein case as a potent issue that could carry weight heading into election season.

Boebert said Thursday she had no intention to “go after” the attorney general but is eager to find out why the federal Epstein investigation has not yet resulted in further accountability or prosecutions.

Massie, who does not sit on the Oversight panel but questioned Bondi last month at a combative House Judiciary hearing, said he believed the closed-door setting afforded by a sworn deposition would give Bondi the opportunity to provide more substantive testimony.

He suspected that his Republican colleagues would act increasingly independent of the White House in the coming months, as more lawmakers choose to retire and primary season passes. He also pointed to Noem as evidence that Trump’s cabinet members are dispensable.

“I guess it shows it’s possible that he would, you know, replace people,” Massie said.

Meredith Lee Hill, Mia McCarthy, Kyle Cheney and Erica Orden contributed to this report.“

Trump SNAPS at reporter over Iran question, demands football focus - YouTube

 

Gas Prices Continue to Surge in U.S., Rising 14% in a Week

Gas Prices Continue to Surge in U.S., Rising 14% in a Week

“Gas prices in the U.S. surged 14% in a week, reaching an average of $3.41 per gallon, due to disrupted oil supplies from the Persian Gulf. The conflict in Iran has led to a global surge in oil prices, impacting the cost of gasoline and other refined products. While prices may stabilize once oil channels reopen, the economic impact could be long-lasting.

Soaring oil prices suggest that more increases could be in store for American drivers. Diesel, jet fuel, and other refined products are also becoming much more expensive.

In the foreground, a blurred gas pump nozzle and part of a car. A blue SUNOCO sign displays gas prices.
The conflict in Iran has disrupted the world’s supply of oil and driven up prices at the pump.Matt Rourke/Associated Press

The price of gas in the United States reached an average of $3.41 per gallon on Saturday, a day after crude oil prices soared to levels not seen since 2023 as the spillover from the U.S.-Israeli attacks on Iran continued.

That gain means gasoline has jumped 14 percent in the past week, according to data from the AAA motor club. The prices recorded Saturday were the highest for gasoline since 2024.

The suddenly rising energy costs — everything from jet fuel to diesel for trucks and tractors is more expensive — are rooted in supplies of crude oil coming from the Persian Gulf. The tankers that normally carry oil out of the region are not sailing, cutting the world off from about one-fifth of its oil supply.

That’s led to a surge in oil prices globally. By Friday, the U.S. crude benchmark, called West Texas Intermediate, had climbed more than 35 percent for the week, to settle at $90.90 a barrel, with much of that gain coming on Friday alone. The last time crude was trading at those levels, gasoline in the United States was above $3.80 a gallon, the data from AAA shows.

There are already big variations in how much drivers pay. Though oil prices make up the largest share of the cost of gasoline — about 60 percent — taxes, refining margins, and distribution costs can raise prices further. Drivers in California, for example, paid an average of $5.08 a gallon on Saturday, the highest in the country, while those in Kansas paid $2.90, the lowest.

Prices at the pump could steady once oil channels reopen, but the impact on American wallets could extend beyond that time.

“Even if it’s a short-term increase in prices and in two to three months we go back to where we were, you still significantly squeeze people’s budgets, and you significantly impacted the economy,” said Wayne Winegarden, an economist at Pacific Research Institute, a think tank. “That will have long-term implications.”

In an interview on Thursday with Reuters, President Trump suggested that the military operation in Iran was his priority and that he was willing to tolerate a rise in prices. “They’ll drop very rapidly when this is over, and if they rise, they rise, but this is far more important than having gasoline prices go up a little bit,” he said.

Energy experts generally say presidents have little control over the price of oil, but the United States does have its Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which has a storage capacity of 714 million barrels, to turn to in case of shortages. In 2022, as gas prices spiked after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, President Joseph R. Biden Jr. released millions of barrels from the stockpile to level out commodity prices.

But if any effect is felt, it would likely only be temporary, and the reserve was not designed to be an economic cushion.

If the United States “is being impacted and we don’t have supplies, and the military needs oil, or the government, that’s the purpose of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, for those types of kind of emergency conditions,” Mr. Winegarden said. “If its purpose is to ameliorate market trends, it’s just insufficient to that job.” 

Trump Vows to Hit Iran Harder

Trump Vows to Hit Iran Harder


“President Trump claimed that Iran had surrendered. He made the statement after the country’s president said earlier that Iran would end strikes in Gulf states, with caveats. Qatar and Bahrain reported incoming fire.

The U.S.-Israeli war with Iran has entered its second week, with hundreds killed and hundreds of thousands displaced. President Trump vowed to hit Iran hard, while Iranian President Pezeshkian apologized to Gulf states but rejected Trump’s demand for unconditional surrender. The conflict has escalated, impacting international travel, shipping, and oil prices, with no clear resolution in sight.

Pinned

President Trump on Saturday vowed that Iran would be “hit very hard” — including “areas and groups of people” yet to be targeted since the Israeli-American joint assault began — as the spiraling war entered its second week.

Mr. Trump also said Iran had “apologized and surrendered to its Middle East neighbors.” His remarks came after a televised speech earlier on Saturday by Masoud Pezeshkian, the Iranian president, who is also a member of the interim three-person council running the country.

While Mr. Pezeshkian apologized to Gulf states for shooting scores of missiles and drones at them in retaliatory strikes, he also called Mr. Trump’s demand for unconditional surrender “a dream that our enemies will take to the grave.”

Mr. Pezeshkian cautioned that Iran reserved the right to respond to countries from whose territory Iran was attacked. And later on Saturday afternoon — after criticism from Iranian hard-liners — Mr. Pezeshkian issued another statement.

“We have not attacked our friendly and neighboring countries. Rather, we have targeted U.S. military bases, facilities, and installations in the region,” he said on social media.

The mixed remarks by American and Iranian leaders left it far from clear whether an off-ramp to end the war was emerging. Shortly after Mr. Pezeshkian’s televised apology, air-raid sirens rang out in Bahrain and Qatar, suggesting that attacks were still continuing.

U.S. forces have struck over 3,000 targets since the American-Israeli air war against Iran began last weekend, according to the U.S. military’s Central Command, which is responsible for the Middle East. Senior U.S. officials last briefed the public on the fighting two days ago.

The Israeli military said on Saturday that it had launched “a broad-scale wave of strikes” overnight across the Iranian capital of Tehran and central Iran. Israeli attacks hit Mehrabad airport in Tehran overnight, the military said, targeting planes affiliated with Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.

After just over a week, the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran has killed hundreds and displaced hundreds of thousands; drawn in states from Oman to Turkey; snarled international travel and shipping; and sent oil and gas prices surging.

President Trump’s plan for the war remained very much unclear. His administration has zigzagged between outlining specific military goals for the war versus a broader attempt to oust the Iranian government.

Israel also intensified its attacks in Lebanon against Iran-backed Hezbollah militants there. Overnight, Israeli warplanes repeatedly bombarded the southern outskirts of Beirut, where the military had ordered hundreds of thousands of residents to flee or face imminent danger.

The Israeli military said its special forces had also launched a rare raid deep in eastern Lebanon to search — unsuccessfully — for the remains of Ron Arad, an Israeli soldier deemed missing in action since the 1980s. The raid prompted clashes in which at least 41 people were killed amid Israeli airstrikes, according to Lebanese officials and state media.

Here’s what else we’re covering:

  • Death toll: Hundreds of people have been killed in Iran since the start of the U.S.-Israeli attacks, according to the Red Crescent Society. More than 200 people in Lebanon have been killed, according to the Lebanese health ministry. 

  • Oil and gasoline prices: The price of the U.S. domestic benchmark crude soared by almost $10 a barrel in a single day, closing near $91 on Friday, its highest since 2023. The average price of unleaded gasoline in the United States reached $$3.41 per gallon, up 14 percent since the war began. The concurrent increases could be a serious shock to an already-slowing world economy.

  • Dubai airport: Dubai International announced on Saturday that it had partly resumed operations, after saying earlier that all flights were suspended. The Emirati authorities have not said what caused the disruption, but video circulating on social media appeared to show a drone strike near the airport. The sound of a whirring motor can be heard as an object plummets to the ground, causing an explosion.

  • Evacuations: The State Department is battling accusations from diplomats and travelers who say the Trump administration endangered U.S. citizens by beginning a war without adequate plans for helping Americans leave the Middle East.“

 

Friday, March 06, 2026

Kristi Noem gets ANOTHER humiliation after firing | Another Day - YouTube

 

Big Revisions Are a Reason to Question Jobs Numbers, Not Dismiss Them

Big Revisions Are a Reason to Question Jobs Numbers, Not Dismiss Them

"Economists say estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and other agencies are reliable, but they worry the quality of data is eroding.

A row of townhouses under construction, with wooden planks leaning against the structures and two men in the distance working on roofs.
Construction of townhouses in Simpsonville, S.C. Home building and other aspects of the economy, in addition to the jobs numbers, have seen large revisions in recent years.Will Crooks for The New York Times

When the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its monthly jobs report last July, the news looked good. U.S. employers had added 147,000 jobs in June, a steady pace that analysts said showed the economy’s resilience in the face of tariffs and uncertainty.

A month later, the story changed. The agency said employers had in fact added just 14,000 jobs in June, a sharp downward revision that, along with other evidence, led to renewed fears of an economic slowdown.

Last month, the story changed again. The government said employment actually declined by 20,000 in June, and that job growth over the past two years was overstated by nearly one million. In the latest jobs report, released on Friday, the government said employment fell by 17,000 in December, rather than rising by 48,000 as previously estimated.

Data revisions are a fact of life for the forecasters, investors and policymakers who follow the monthly twists and turns of the U.S. economy. But the scale of recent adjustments have given some of them pause. What, exactly, is the point of a monthly jobs report that can’t reliably distinguish a solid gain from an outright loss?

Job growth revisions

The Bureau of Labor Statistics often revises its estimate by many thousands. Recent adjustments have been consistently downward.

Three-month moving

averages, seasonally adjusted 

It isn’t just the jobs numbers. Measures of inflation, consumer spending, home building and other aspects of the economy have seen large revisions, wild swings or other distortions and quirks. Officials at the Federal Reserve have pointed to data issues as an added source of uncertainty in their policy decisions. And a few economists have come to question the longstanding consensus that U.S. government data is the “gold standard” globally.

“I think that referring to it as the ‘gold standard’ is giving it way too much credibility,” said Steven Englander, an economist at Standard Chartered.

Most economists say data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and other federal agencies remains among the best in the world. But they say it is important to understand its limitations.

The monthly jobs numbers, which are based on a survey of employers, are subject to significant margins of error and are regularly updated as more complete information becomes available. Sophisticated data users know to read the numbers in context — taking into account not just the latest estimate but also the recent trend, as well as evidence from other sources.

“Any one number can shift your understanding a bit, but always in the context of lots of underlying detail and lots of neighboring economic data that are all part of the overall picture,” said Jed Kolko, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics who helped oversee economic data at the Commerce Department during the Biden administration.

Mr. Kolko likened the monthly jobs numbers to a blood test. Few doctors would recommend radical changes based on one high cholesterol reading. Rather, they would interpret it alongside a patient’s history, fitness and other metrics, and perhaps order follow-up tests.

“That doesn’t mean you ignore the data point,” Mr. Kolko said. “It doesn’t mean that doctors shouldn’t tell you what your cholesterol number is. But it does mean that the interpretation requires other data and context.”

The monthly data last year, Mr. Kolko and others noted, mostly depicted the labor market as stuck in a “low-hire, low-fire” stasis, where employers were adding few jobs but also not laying off many workers. That basic narrative remained unchanged after the revisions.

No Signs of Political Bias

The most prominent critic of the statistical agencies has been President Trump himself. After the big downward revisions last summer, he fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Erika McEntarfer, accusing her, without evidence, of rigging the numbers against him for political reasons.

Economists almost universally rejected those accusations, noting that there was no political pattern to the agency’s numbers and that there had been similar negative revisions under President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Ms. McEntarfer’s firing added to fears among Democrats that Mr. Trump would try to pressure the agency into producing more favorable estimates. But there is no evidence of that happening, either. Current and former staffers say that the agency is using the same procedures as under past administrations, and that it would be impossible for the White House to interfere in its operations without detection.

Mr. Trump tried to replace Ms. McEntarfer with E.J. Antoni, a conservative economist with a history of social media posts that often appeared to distort economic statistics to support partisan positions. But the president withdrew the nomination after bipartisan backlash, and named a more traditional candidate, Brett Matsumoto, to lead the agency. Mr. Matsumoto, who must still be confirmed by the Senate, has been widely praised by economists, including former B.L.S. commissioners under presidents of both political parties.

In the interim, the agency has been led by its deputy commissioner, William J. Wiatrowski, a respected civil servant who has worked there for more than four decades.

Ms. McEntarfer herself has defended the agency in recent weeks, saying she was confident the remaining staff would speak up if they felt pressure to skew the numbers.

“You should still trust B.L.S. data,” Ms. McEntarfer wrote in a social media post last month.

Signs of Erosion

Still, just because the data isn’t politically biased doesn’t mean it is reliable. The Bureau of Labor Statistics now says employers added just 116,000 jobs in 2025, 80 percent fewer than its initial estimate of 584,000. That followed a downward revision a year earlier that was nearly as large.

The policymakers and forecasters who follow the data most closely had plenty of warning that the revisions were coming. The B.L.S. released a preliminary version of the adjustment in September, and private-sector economists produced their own estimates even earlier. Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair, said last fall that policymakers believed the monthly estimates were exaggerating the pace of job growth.

Economists are optimistic that the big revisions are at least partly the result of temporary factors and that the data will become more reliable going forward. The Covid-19 pandemic led to waves of business openings and closures, which are difficult for the government to track in real time, and upended the seasonal patterns that statisticians try to account for in their estimates. The surge in immigration in the early years of the Biden administration, and the sharp decline later in his term and under Mr. Trump, have broken models that were built for much more gradual demographic shifts.

“We’re getting the aftershocks of the Covid experience and how that restructured the economy,” said Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at J.P. Morgan. “It’s possible that normalcy will return and uncertainty will dissipate.”

But economists do have concerns about the long-term health of the statistical system, which has been strained by years of shrinking budgets, staff turnover and declining response rates to the surveys that still form the backbone of much of its data collection.

Those problems predate the Trump administration but have grown worse during it. The agencies lost hundreds of veteran employees to voluntary buyout and early retirement programs early in Mr. Trump’s term, and attrition continued after Ms. McEntarfer’s firing. Senior roles at the Bureau of Labor Statistics have been vacant for months, and staffing shortages lower in the ranks have forced the agency to limit some data collection.

The six-week government shutdown last fall further disrupted data collection and led agencies to delay or cancel dozens of data releases.

Statistical experts, including many inside the agencies, have argued for years that the system must rely less on surveys and more on data from the private sector and other parts of the government, such as the Internal Revenue Service. Such a “blended data” approach could provide statistics that are more accurate, timely and granular than survey-based estimates, and that are more comprehensive than what private companies can produce.

But developing such approaches would require time and resources that the cash-strapped statistical agencies have not had. In recent years, a number of private efforts, many funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, have been researching new approaches to data collection to try to accelerate the process.

“There’s good reason to be concerned that the quality of our statistics is going to deteriorate,” said Karen Dynan, a Harvard economist who has been involved in several of those efforts. “Even before this administration, there was reason to be concerned. The agencies have been fighting an uphill battle for years.”

Ben Casselman is the chief economics correspondent for The Times. He has reported on the economy for nearly 20 years."

U.S. Employers Cut Jobs in Sign of a Shakier Economy

Live Updates: U.S. Employers Cut Jobs in Sign of a Shakier Economy

A weaker-than-expected report for February showed a decline of 92,000 jobs, and a rise in the unemployment rate to 4.4 percent.

Monthly change in jobs

Note: Data is seasonally adjusted.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Jacqueline Gu/The New York Times