Contact Me By Email

Contact Me By Email

Monday, April 20, 2026

In Turkey, Middle Powers Ponder Diplomacy With a Rogue U.S.

 

In Turkey, Middle Powers Ponder Diplomacy With a Rogue U.S.

“At Turkey’s Antalya Diplomacy Forum, discussions centered on how to respond to a U.S. that disregards allies and the global order. The U.S.-Israeli war on Iran, launched despite global opposition, has disrupted the global economy and strained U.S. alliances. While regional cooperation is seen as a potential solution, experts acknowledge that the U.S. remains indispensable despite its unpredictability.

The U.S. remains an essential player. The problem, one analyst said, is how to deal effectively with a power that is “indispensable, coercive and unpredictable at the same time.”

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan speaks behind a white podium with a red emblem. A screen backdrop shows "ANTALYA DIPLOMACY FORUM" with radiating red and blue lines.
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey in Antalya on Friday, where he said the global system was in “a moral and existential crisis.”Riza Ozel/Associated Press

By Ben Hubbard

Ben Hubbard reported from Antalya, Turkey, where he attended Turkey’s annual diplomatic conference.

At Turkey’s showcase diplomatic conference in the Mediterranean resort town of Antalya over the weekend, the United States was rarely the official topic of conversation.

But coursing through the discussions among the thousands of participants — including dozens of heads of state and other senior officials from Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia — were questions about how to respond when the United States disregards its allies and the global order it long professed to represent.

The foreign policy chaos of President Trump’s second term, and the vast disruptions caused by the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran, has put new urgency behind the idea that Turkey and other so-called middle powers should count less on global heavyweights and instead partner with their neighbors to manage their own regions.

The desire for such cooperation surfaced repeatedly at the conference, the Antalya Diplomacy Forum, which concluded on Sunday.

“If this region continues to wait for a savior, in the end it is going to continue facing these problems until eternity,” Turkey’s foreign minister, Hakan Fidan, said at the closing news conference.

Instead, states must come together to “own regional issues,” he said.

Since his return to the White House, Mr. Trump has cast off long-held tenets of U.S. foreign policy. He has bashed the United Nations, threatened to withdraw from NATO and given up on promoting human rights and democracy abroad.

But the war in Iran, which he launched with Israel despite fervent efforts by other countries to prevent the conflict, has disrupted the global economy and turned several U.S. partners into targets for Iranian retribution.

“America acted in Iran against its allies’ interests,” said Timothy Ash, an economist at RBC Bluebay Asset Management in London, who attended the conference. “That reinforces the idea that there needs to be an alternative to the Americans.”

The Antalya conference served not just as a foreign affairs gabfest but also as a venue for Turkey to lay out its view of the world and Turkey’s place in it.

In its fifth year, the gathering attracted an array of mostly non-Western officials and showed off the wide diplomatic network that Turkish officials say makes the country a valuable mediator.

President Ahmad al-Sharaa of Syria at the conference in Antalya on Friday. The thousands of participants included dozens of heads of state.Riza Ozel/Associated Press

On day one, Ukraine’s top diplomat updated a packed room about his country’s efforts to push back Russia’s invasion. The next day, his Russian counterpart held forth to a similarly large audience on the ways he said the West had mistreated Russia.

Despite the Iran war, now on hold with a temporary cease-fire, U.S. and Iranian officials both traversed the crowds queuing for coffee and sandwiches to reach their respective meetings. They did not meet.

Addressing the opening ceremony on Friday, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey said the global system was in “a moral and existential crisis” and repeated his mantra that “the world is bigger than five,” his oft-repeated criticism of the limited number of permanent seats on the United Nations Security Council.

He criticized Israel for what he called its genocide in Gaza and its military expansion into Lebanon, Syria and Iran.

Turkey was ready to help negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, he said, without criticizing Russia for starting it.

He blasted the war in Iran, but without mentioning the United States or Mr. Trump, with whom he has a cordial relationship.

Many participants expressed frustration with the Iran conflict.

“We find ourselves subject to Iranian attacks that were unprovoked in a war that we tried to prevent,” Jordan’s foreign minister, Ayman Safadi, lamented during one panel.

Two senior American officials attended. One of them, Tom Barrack, Mr. Trump’s ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria, ruffled feathers by saying during a public interview: “This part of the world respects only one thing: power. And if you don’t reflect power, if you reflect weakness, you are on your heels.”

He added that the only governments that had worked in the Middle East were “benevolent monarchies” and republics that were run in similar ways.

“Countries that have put on this cloak of democracy or that we have gone after for human rights have failed,” he said, mentioning the Arab Spring uprisings that began in 2010 and produced short-lived, democratic governments in Egypt and Tunisia.

The clearest example of steps toward greater regional cooperation was a meeting on the sidelines of the conference on Saturday between the foreign ministers of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Pakistan, who hope to deepen their cooperation.

Experts said such coalitions could not fill all the gaps left by the United States.

“The trouble that the region feels vis-à-vis the U.S. is that the U.S. still is indispensable for many regional actors, but it is also unreliable and coercive,” said Galip Dalay, a senior research fellow at Chatham House who was at the conference. “How do you deal with an actor that is indispensable, coercive and unpredictable at the same time?”

He predicted that Turkey and other countries would continue to pursue such initiatives, but only with countries that the United States would approve of.

Ben Hubbard is the Istanbul bureau chief for The Times, covering Turkey and the surrounding region.“

US military seizes Iran-flagged ship trying to pass strait of Hormuz blockade

US military seizes Iran-flagged ship trying to pass strait of Hormuz blockade

“The US military seized an Iranian-flagged cargo ship, the Touska, near the strait of Hormuz, claiming it violated a blockade and was under US sanctions. Iran condemned the seizure as piracy and threatened retaliation, rejecting new peace talks due to the blockade and US actions. The incident escalates tensions between the US and Iran, potentially impacting the global energy crisis.

Iran calls seizure an act of piracy as Trump says ship tried to get past US naval blockade ‘and it did not go well for them’

container ship in water
US forces operating in the Arabian Sea enforced naval blockade measures against an Iranian-flagged cargo vessel attempting to sail towards an Iranian port. Photograph: US Central Command

The US military has attacked and seized an Iranian-flagged container ship that attempted to get past an American blockade near the strait of Hormuz, the first such interception since the blockade of Iranian ports began last week.

Iran’s joint military command said Tehran would respond soon and called the US seizure an act of piracy that violated the ceasefire that has been in place since 8 April.

The news threw into question Donald Trump’s earlier announcement that US negotiators would head to Pakistan on Monday for another round of talks with Iran. That had raised hopes of extending a fragile ceasefire set to expire by Wednesday, but Iran has not confirmed it will attend.

In a post on X, US Central Command said US marines departed the USS Tripoli assault ship by helicopter and rappelled on to Touska on Sunday. The post included a video of the marines onboard the helicopter

Trump had earlier posted on X that the ship had tried to get past the US blockade “and it did not go well for them”. The US president said a US navy guided missile destroyer warned the Touska to stop in the Gulf of Oman but the vessel did not. “[Our] Navy ship stopped them right in their tracks by blowing a hole in the engine room,” Trump said, adding that US marines now had custody of the vessel.

He said the ship was under US treasury sanctions because of “prior history of illegal activity”. The ship is on the treasury department’s list of sanctioned vessels.

A spokesperson for Iran military’s central command centre, Khatam al-Anbiya, cited by the Isna news agency, said: “We warn that the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran will soon respond and retaliate against this armed piracy and the US military.”

Iranian state media also reported that Tehran had – for now – rejected new peace talks, citing the ongoing blockade, threatening rhetoric, and Washington’s shifting positions and “excessive demands”.

Video posted on social media by the US defence department showed the interception of the ship by US forces. The video includes audio of the container ship’s crew being warned that they will be fired on if they refuse to stop. “Vacate your engine room,” a US sailor can be heard saying. “We’re prepared to subject you to disabling fire.”

The video then shows the USS Spruance firing on the Touska.

US navy ship fires on vessel trying to get past blockade

The cargo ship was stopped near Iran’s border with Pakistan. Touska had previously left Port Klang, a major port in Malaysia, when the vessel then attempted to move past the US blockade, according to tracking information from TankerTrackers.com.

The escalating standoff threatens to deepen the energy crisis roiling the global economy and push the two countries toward renewed fighting, in a conflict that has killed at least 3,000 people in Iran, nearly 2,300 in Lebanon, 23 civilians and 15 soldiers in Israel, and more than a dozen in Gulf Arab states. Thirteen US service members have also been killed.“ 

Sunday, April 19, 2026

Rami Khouri: U.S. & Israel Were “Forced into Two Ceasefires” as Regional Balance of Power Shifts | Democracy Now!



Middle East crisis live: US officials to travel to Pakistan for talks as Trump warns US will ‘knock out’ every power plant if Iran doesn’t accept deal

Middle East crisis live: US officials to travel to Pakistan for talks as Trump warns US will ‘knock out’ every power plant if Iran doesn’t accept deal

London’s Metropolitan Police deputy commissioner Matt Jukes (C), deputy assistant commissioner Vicki Evans (L) and Mathew Walker (R) make a statement to the media by an area cordoned off by police, near the Kenton United Synagogue in Harrow, north-west London on April 19, 2026
London’s Metropolitan Police deputy commissioner Matt Jukes (C), deputy assistant commissioner Vicki Evans (L) and Mathew Walker (R) make a statement to the media by an area cordoned off by police, near the Kenton United Synagogue in Harrow, north-west London on April 19, 2026Photograph: Justin Tallis/AFP/Getty Images

Today so far

  • "Iran’s top negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, said on Saturday that the recent talks with the US had made progress but gaps remained over nuclear issues and the strait of Hormuz. “We have had progress but there is still a big distance between us,” he told state media, referring to talks last weekend. “We made progress in the negotiations, but there are many gaps and some fundamental points remain.”

  • Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian weighed in on Sunday about Donald Trump and efforts to quash Iranian nuclear capabilities. “Trump says Iran cannot make use of its nuclear rights but doesn’t say for what crime. Who is he to deprive a nation of its rights?” Pezeshkian said.

  • In more nuclear news, Iranian deputy foreign minister Saeed Khatibzadeh told the Associated Press that contrary to Trump’s earlier claims, Iran will not hand over its enriched uranium to the US.

  • In Lebanon, killing and destruction has continued despite a fragile ceasefire. An Israeli soldier was killed in southern Lebanon in an incident that severely wounded another soldiers and moderately injured four more, while another succombed on Saturday to injuries incured in another incident. Meanwhile, the state-run National News Agency is reporting that the Israeli military has demolished homes in the towns of Bayyada and Naqoura and have blocked roads leading to several towns. Lebanese state media also reported that Israeli forces on Saturday began demolishing homes in the southern Lebanese town of Bint Jbeil and other border towns where Israeli troops are present.

  • Earlier, a UN peacekeeper was killed and three others were injured in an attack that UN secretary-general António Guterres has strongly condemned. Both Emmanuel Macron, president of France, and the group known as the UN Interim Force in Lebanon blamed Hezbollah, but the militant group has denied involvement.

  • In Gaza, the Israeli military killed two Unicef-contracted truck drivers at a water point in the northern Gaza forcing the UN agency to suspend its operations in the area, Unicef said.

Here are some more images coming out of Lebanon today of residents forced to traverse broken bridges and destroyed roads to return home during the temporary ceasefire:

A group of people carefully traverse a broken bridge.
Displaced people cross on foot over a destroyed bridge in Tayr Felsay village as they return to their homes during a temporary ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel on 19 April 2026. Photograph: Bilal Hussein/AP
A group of people, including some children, pause on one side of a bridge, some cars behind them. In front of them, the brdige has collapsed and there is a large hole.
Displaced people cross on foot over a destroyed bridge in Tayr Felsay village as they return to their homes during a temporary ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel on 19 April 2026. Photograph: Bilal Hussein/AP
Two men setand on one side of a river that has three large muddy barrels serving as a sort of crossing. Across the way, more men and workers gather around construction machinary.
Lebanese army soldiers set up a makeshift bridge for people to cross a river in Tayr Felsay, a village in southern Lebanon, on 19 April 2026. Photograph: Bilal Hussein/AP
A red van drives across a makeshift bridge in lebanon, the occupants looking out of the windows cautiously.
Displaced people drive across a temporary bridge on their way home in Bedias, Lebanon on 19 April 2026. Photograph: Xinhua/Shutterstock"
Middle East crisis live: US officials to travel to Pakistan for talks as Trump warns US will ‘knock out’ every power plant if Iran doesn’t accept deal

Opinion | The Divine Right of Presidents Is a Dangerous Idea - The New York Times

I Missed the Part About the Divine Right of Presidents

A group of supporters lays hands on a man in a suit with a flag pin in his lapel.
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

"In January, 2024 Donald Trump supporters made a video called “God Made Trump.” It was in the style of Paul Harvey’s famous speech “So God Made a Farmer.” It even included a simulation of the legendary broadcaster’s voice, and it began like this:

“And on June 14, 1946, God looked down on his planned paradise and said, ‘I need a caretaker.’ So God gave us Trump.”

For more than two minutes, the video waxes eloquent about Trump’s alleged virtues, and then it declares that he’s a “shepherd to mankind who won’t ever leave nor forsake them.”

Trump liked the video so much he shared it from his Truth Social account.

At a White House event on April 1, a few days before Easter, Paula White-Cain, an evangelical Christian pastor and the president’s chief spiritual adviser, told him to his face that he was the “greatest champion of faith that we’ve ever seen in a president,” and then she compared his story to Jesus Christ’s. “You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused,” she said, “It’s a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us.”

“And sir,” she continued, “because of his resurrection, you rose up.”

I’ve picked out two prominent examples of Trump supporters’ comparing him to Christ, but they’re drops in an ocean of similar analogies. As my friend Skye Jethani, a Christian writer and former pastor, said on the Holy Post podcast, for the last 10 years Christians have been comparing Trump to various biblical figures.

So it should have come as no surprise to anyone that last Monday he finally made the comparison himself. He posted an image on Truth Social that depicted the president as Jesus healing a sick man, with worshipers looking on in adoration, a flag of the United States waving in the background and mysterious figures floating in the sky.

The image was clearly blasphemous, and I was gratified to see a number of people whom I’d consider MAGA Christians strongly criticize the president. For example, a popular right-wing commentator, Cam Higby, posted: “I support Trump, and I spend 8 hours a day defending him. I will not defend blasphemy.” Riley Gaines, a college swimmer turned conservative podcaster, tweeted to her 1.6 million followers on X: “Why? Seriously, I cannot understand why he’d post this. Is he looking for a response? Does he actually think this?”

But it’s too little, too late. Rather than offering the absurd explanation that he thought he was posting an image of himself not as Jesus but as a physician (“I thought it was me as a doctor,” he said. “I make people better.”) he could have simply pointed at a host of his most loyal Christian followers and said, with his trademark sneer, “You started it.”

Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter  Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. 

Much of the commentary after Trump’s blasphemy has been directed at the church. Will Christians condemn what he did? How can they continue to support a man who brazenly violates the Ten Commandments. (“You shall have no other gods before me.”) How much has evangelical support for Trump damaged the church? Is there anything he can do that will break the bond between evangelicals and the president?

But there’s another vitally important question that hovers in the air. How much is Christian zeal for Trump damaging America, and the world?

When the church abandons its rightful role as the conscience of the state and instead seeks to curry favor with the state, there is a real-world consequence. If you take an already grandiose man (whose commercial brand is his own name) and fill him with a sense of divine purpose, you can uncage a tyrant.

To consider the contrast between the biblical model of religious conscience and the actions of Trump’s Christian loyalists, recall one of the most famous confrontations with power in the Old Testament, between a prophet named Nathan and King David.

To conceal his sexual exploitation of a married woman, Bathsheba, David ordered her husband, Uriah, into the thick of combat, effectively murdering him. Nathan confronted David with an allegory of a rich man who stole a lamb from a poor man.

When David expressed anger at the rich man, Nathan revealed the key of his allegory and opened the door by saying, “You are the man.” In a moment of courage that has echoed for thousands of years, he said to the divinely ordained king of Israel: “You had Uriah the Hittite killed in battle. You took his wife as your wife. You used the Ammonites to kill him.”

In the biblical story, David repents immediately and writes one of the most memorable psalms in Scripture. “Have mercy upon me, O God,” it begins, “According to Your lovingkindness; According to the multitude of Your tender mercies, Blot out my transgressions.”

Now let’s look to the words of Franklin Graham, one of the most prominent evangelicals in America — and one of Trump’s most zealous supporters.

In a public statement after Trump posted the image of himself as Jesus, Graham pretended to believe Trump’s absurd explanation of the image, writing, “I’m thankful the President has made it very clear that this was not at all what he thought the AI-generated image was representing — he thought it was a doctor helping someone, and when he learned of the concerns, he immediately removed the post.” But Graham didn’t stop there. He lashed out against Trump’s critics, “I think his enemies are always foaming at the mouth at any possible opportunity to make him look bad,” he wrote.

Someone else is always to blame.

One gets the feeling that if Graham were alive in King David’s era, he’d be defending David, telling him that Nathan was “foaming at the mouth,” falsely accusing him of murder. I can hear the defenses now.

“Can you really be blamed when a soldier of yours dies in combat?”

“That would never hold up in court.”

“The Ammonites killed Uriah, not you! They’re the criminals here — and, besides, this thing with Bathsheba and so forth is nobody’s business.”

As a thought experiment, ask yourself how a president would behave if he believed he was clothed with divine purpose? Wouldn’t he try to expand his power beyond all previous limits? After all, he’s on a mission from God. Or maybe he thinks he’s like God? It’s hard to type those words, but that’s exactly the meaning of the image Trump shared.

Wouldn’t he feel free to start wars based on his judgment alone, based on his command alone? What is Article I of the Constitution compared with the will of the Almighty?

And wouldn’t such a man be jealous of his religious rivals in the battle for the hearts and minds of American Christians? I don’t think it’s possible to separate Trump’s public fight with Pope Leo XIV and the Catholic Church from his own sense of divine authority.

Pope Leo’s pleas for peace are hardly unprecedented. I distinctly remember Pope John Paul II’s strong objections to Operation Iraqi Freedom. Yet an American president has never responded to a pope with personal attacks and lies as Trump has.

And when he did, Vice President JD Vance, a relatively recent convert to Catholicism, responded (incredibly enough) by scolding the pope. “In the same way that it’s important for the vice president of the United States to be careful when I talk about matters of public policy,” he said, “I think it’s very, very important for the pope to be careful when he talks about matters of theology.”

One pernicious effect of Trump’s attacks is to stir up long-buried divisions between Catholics and Protestants. Papal conspiracies have a long and sad history in Protestant Christianity, and oceans of blood have been spilled in the wars between the different strands of world Christianity.

In fact, this second Trump term has been one long experiment in what happens when a president and a movement discard the wisdom of the founders. A man like Trump was supposed to be hemmed in by a combination of law and morality.

As I’ve written before, presidents were put in a Madisonian box, meaning that he was constrained by both the language of the Constitution and the example of a person, George Washington. Washington could have grasped total control, but instead he limited his authority. He demonstrated forbearance against his enemies. In many ways, he defined what it meant to be the leader of a republic.

Trump sees it differently. “My own morality,” he told us. “My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.” And his own morality includes imagining himself as the Son of God in a social media post.

The American system was built to contain personal power, to prevent religious strife and to limit the nation’s ability to go to war. Trump blows through the constraints on the executive branch, stokes religious conflict and sends the world’s most powerful nation to war based on his judgment alone. To make matters worse, he’s full of divine purpose. He’s told the world that he was “saved by God to make America great again.”

When you dismantle a system that was intended to prevent ancient evils from destroying the new world, you can help unleash those evils back on the world. Catholics and Protestants feud once again. A world leader who is infused with religious purpose picks a fight with the Vatican. And the great powers inch toward conflict, with a president of the United States who refuses to recognize any moral or legal limits on his power at all."

For Iran, Flexing Control Over Waterway Is New Deterrent - The New York Times

For Iran, Flexing Control Over Waterway Is New Deterrent

"Iran’s government could emerge from the conflict with a blueprint to keep adversaries at bay, regardless of any restrictions on its nuclear program.

A satellite image shows ships sailing in the ocean around a peninsula.
A satellite image showing ships’ movements in a section of the Strait of Hormuz this month.Copernicus Sentinel-2, via Reuters

The United States and Israel launched their war against Iran on the argument that if Iran one day got a nuclear weapon, it would have the ultimate deterrent against future attacks.

It turns out that Iran already has a deterrent: its own geography.

Iran’s decision to flex its control over shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic choke point through which 20 percent of the world’s oil supply flows, has brought global economic pain in the form of higher prices for gasoline, fertilizer and other staples. It has upended war planning in the United States and Israel, where officials have had to devise military options to wrest the strait from Iranian control.

The U.S.-Israeli war has significantly damaged Iran’s leadership structure, larger naval vessels and missile production facilities, but it has done little to restrict Iran’s ability to control the strait.

Iran could thus emerge from the conflict with a blueprint for its hard-line theocratic government to keep its adversaries at bay, regardless of any restrictions on its nuclear program.

“Everyone now knows that if there is a conflict in the future, closing the strait will be the first thing in the Iranian textbook,” said Danny Citrinowicz, a former head of the Iran branch of Israel’s military intelligence agency and now a fellow at the Atlantic Council. “You cannot beat geography.”

In several social media posts on Friday, President Trump said that the strait, which in one post he called the “Strait of Iran,” was “completely open” to shipping. Iran’s foreign minister made a similar declaration. On Saturday, however, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said that the waterway remained closed, suggesting a divide among Iranian military and civilians on the issue  during negotiations to end the war.

Whereas just the prospect of sea mines is enough to scare off commercial shipping, Iran retains far more precise means of control: attack drones and short-range missiles. American military and intelligence officials estimate that, after weeks of war, Iran still has about 40 percent of its arsenal of attack drones and upward of 60 percent of its missile launchers — more than enough to hold shipping in the Strait of Hormuz hostage in the future.

A central goal of the U.S.-led military campaign in Iran is now reopening the strait, which was open when the war began. It is a precarious position for the United States, and its adversaries have taken notice.

“It’s not clear how the truce between Washington and Tehran will play out. But one thing is certain — Iran has tested its nuclear weapons. It’s called the Strait of Hormuz. Its potential is inexhaustible,” Dmitri Medvedev, a former president of Russia and deputy chairman of the country’s security council, wrote on social media last week.

Iran’s control over the strait forced President Trump to announce a naval blockade of his own, and this week the U.S. Navy began forcing cargo ships into Iranian ports after they transited the waterway.

Iran responded with anger, but also taunting. “The Strait of Hormuz isn’t social media. If someone blocks you, you can’t just block them back,” one Iranian diplomatic outpost, which has posted snarky messages throughout the war, wrote on X in response to Mr. Trump’s move. The dispute over the strait has been the focus of numerous A.I.-generated videos depicting American and Israeli officials as Lego characters.

Still, the impact of the American blockade has been real. Seaborne trade accounts for roughly 90 percent of Iran’s economic output — approximately $340 million per day — and that flow in recent days has largely ground to a halt.

Iran considers the blockade an act of war and has threatened to attack it. But so far it has not, nor has the United States tried during the current cease-fire to reduce Iran’s grip over the strait when the conflict finally ends.

“It may be that both countries see there is a real window to have negotiations” and don’t want to escalate the conflict right now, Adm. Kevin Donegan, who once commanded the U.S. Navy’s fleet with responsibility for the Middle East and is now retired, said during a seminar hosted by the Middle East Institute this week.

Iran tried to block the Strait of Hormuz once before, mining it and the Persian Gulf during the conflict with Iraq during the 1980s. But mine warfare is dangerous, and decades later Iran has effectively harnessed missile and drone technology to threaten both commercial and military maritime traffic.

While the U.S. and Israeli war significantly damaged Iran’s weapons manufacturing capability, Iran has preserved enough of its missiles, launchers and one-way attack drones to put shipping in the strait at risk.

U.S. intelligence and military estimates vary, but multiple officials said that Iran has about 40 percent of its prewar arsenal of drones. Those drones have proved to be a powerful deterrent. While they are easily shot down by American warships, commercial tankers have few defenses.

Iran also has ample supplies of missiles and missile launchers. At the time of the cease-fire, Iran had access to about half its missile launchers. In the days that immediately followed, it dug out about 100 systems that had been buried inside caves and bunkers, bringing its stockpile of launchers back up to about 60 percent of its prewar level.

Iran is also digging out its supply of missiles, similarly buried in rubble from American attacks on its bunkers and depots. When that work is done, Iran could reclaim as much as 70 percent of its prewar arsenal, according to some American estimates.

Officials note that the counts of Iran’s weapon stocks are not precise. Intelligence assessments offer a broad look at how much power Iran retains.

But while estimates of Iran’s missile stockpiles differ, there is agreement among officials that Iran has enough weaponry to halt shipping in the future.

Iran’s government chose not to block the Strait of Hormuz last June, when Israel launched a military campaign that United States eventually joined to hit deeply buried nuclear sites.

Mr. Citrinowicz, the former Israeli official, said that decision probably reflected the cautious approach of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who may have been concerned that blocking the strait could have led other countries to join the military campaign against Iran.

Ayatollah Khamenei was killed during the first day of the current war, a move that signaled to Iranian officials that American and Israeli goals for this conflict were far more expansive.

Iran “saw the June war as an Israeli war for their own strategic objectives,” Mr. Citrinowicz said. “This is a regime change war.”

Eric Schmitt contributed reporting.

Mark Mazzetti is an investigative reporter based in Washington, D.C., focusing on national security, intelligence, and foreign affairs. He has written a book about the C.I.A.

Adam Entous is a Washington-based investigative reporter focused on national security and intelligence matters.

Julian E. Barnes covers the U.S. intelligence agencies and international security matters for The Times. He has written about security issues for more than two decades."

For Iran, Flexing Control Over Waterway Is New Deterrent - The New York Times