Contact Me By Email

Contact Me By Email

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Trump dev­ast­ated Iran, now he hits them with a ... LOVEBOMB

 

Trump dev­ast­ated Iran, now he hits them with a ... LOVEBOMB

Des­pite the same Islamic regime that has chanted “death to Amer­ica” still rul­ing Iran, Pres­id­ent Trump yes­ter­day said they are “rational” as he defen­ded a deal that will waive sanc­tions on Tehran and allow them to profit from oil sales in exchange for a gen­eral prom­ise not to pur­sue nuc­lear weapons.

WASHINGTON — Pres­id­ent Trump on Tues­day praised Iran’s lead­er­ship as “very rational” and “not rad­ic­al­ized” people as he sold a US-Iran agree­ment that could enrich the regime.

Trump’s shower­ing of com­pli­ments — even call­ing the Ira­ni­ans “nice to deal with” — comes as details of the pur­por­ted terms of the peace deal were pub­lished Tues­day after­noon by Israeli and Saudi news out­lets — with Con­gress and US allies still left in the dark.

Major Amer­ican news out­lets, includ­ing The Post, could not imme­di­ately con­firm the authen­ti­city of the doc­u­ments, and in a fur­ther wrinkle, Israel’s Chan­nel 12 pos­ted a 12-point ver­sion that dif­fers in word­ing, order and sub­stance from Al Arabiya’s 14-point edi­tion.

‘Nice to deal with’

The repor­ted terms of the deal would allow Iran to restart its oil busi­ness by waiv­ing sanc­tions, lift­ing the naval block­ade and free­ing up to $300 bil­lion to recon­struct Iran through invest­ments with Gulf coun­tries.

The White House did not cla­rify whether the leaked texts were accur­ate.

Trump pledged to release the text him­self after a planned

sign­ing cere­mony with the Ira­ni­ans on Fri­day in Switzer­land.

“I will not only release it. I will prob­ably have a press con­fer­ence and read it to you word by word so that the press cov­ers it accur­ately,” Trump said dur­ing a Tues­day meet­ing at the G7.

Trump, Vice Pres­id­ent JD Vance and Ira­nian par­lia­ment speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf elec­tron­ic­ally signed the memor­andum of under­stand­ing on Sunday, end­ing the nearly four-month war, but had not released the terms as of Tues­day.

Vance will lead the US del­eg­a­tion to Switzer­land while Trump left open the pos­sib­il­ity of also

join­ing the Ira­ni­ans.

“We’re deal­ing with people that I think are very rational people,” Trump said Tues­day. “They were nice to deal with. They were strong people, smart people. I think actu­ally they’re smarter than the first and second group, but they’re not rad­ic­al­ized and they’re, you know, look­ing to help their coun­try.”

Under the deal, Iran agrees not to pur­sue a nuc­lear bomb, but it leaves many major points — like what to do with the enriched uranium it has — up in the air for future talks.

In the mean­time, it allows Iran to sell oil with sanc­tion waivers, a source told The Post. The last time Iran oper­ated sanc­tion-free was in 1979, when the US intro­duced sanc­tions after the Iran Revolu­tion.

Amer­ican offi­cials involved in the deal say it provides for the 60-day toll-free reopen­ing of the Strait of Hor­muz and for gradual sanc­tions relief and unfreez­ing of funds if Tehran cooper­ates with the dis­posal of its highly enriched uranium and ends sup­port for ter­ror­ist prox­ies.

That 60-day time frame is included in the Chan­nel 12 ver­sion, but the Al Arabiya ver­sion says the sides agree to reopen pas­sage to full capa­city “within 30 days.”

$300B invest fund

Both ver­sions men­tion a pro­posed $300 bil­lion invest­ment fund, which US offi­cials say Gulf Arab states will fin­ance.

AFP via Getty Images

The exact word­ing of the agree­ment has stoked broad con­cern among Iran hawks who cheered on Trump’s mil­it­ary cam­paign to pre­vent the Islamic Repub­lic from ever devel­op­ing a nuc­lear weapon.

Skep­tics fear that Trump may never reach a point in fol­lowup talks where the highly enriched uranium is des­troyed.

Both repor­ted ver­sions say the US will tem­por­ar­ily lift sanc­tions on Ira­nian oil, allow­ing for it to be freely sold to gain needed income after months under block­ade.

Both ver­sions also say Iran will com­mit to fur­ther talks on the fate of the nuc­lear pro­gram and recom­mit to not develop a nuc­lear weapon — however, that long-stand­ing claim was belied in the past by the pre­war pro­cessing of uranium to near-weapons-grade pur­ity.

Chan­nel 12 described its ver­sion as an “out­line.” The Al Arabiya ver­sion con­tains fuller sec­tions, but also pas­sages that seem at-odds with Amer­ican claims that frozen funds will only be released in accord­ance with meas­ur­able pro­gress — with the excep­tion of “small antes” of money described Monday as a truth­build­ing effort.

“The United States under­takes that, in light of the pro­gress of nego­ti­ations towards a final agree­ment, frozen

or restric­ted funds and assets of the Islamic Repub­lic of Iran will be released and made fully avail­able,” the Al Arabiya ver­sion says.

“These funds, whether held in the mas­ter account or trans­ferred, will be used for any final bene­fi­ciary pay­ment determ­ined by the Cent­ral Bank of the Islamic Repub­lic of Iran and will be fully avail­able for use.”

GOP revolt?

That word­ing, if enacted in the actual doc­u­ment, could cause a revolt among con­gres­sional Repub­lic­ans fear­ful of a replay of Pres­id­ent Barack Obama’s 2015 Iran nuc­lear deal, through which an estim­ated $50 bil­lion in frozen funds were released, includ­ing air­lif­ted pal­lets of cash, which did little to curb Iran’s fuel­ing of regional con­flicts or its nuc­lear ambi­tions.

Neither ver­sion cla­ri­fies the future status of the Strait of Hor­muz, which Ira­nian offi­cials hope to toll in con­junc­tion with Oman — though US offi­cials said Monday they expect to con­firm the per­man­ent toll-free status in sub­sequent talks and Trump has threatened to bomb Oman if it part­ners with Iran to impose tolls.

Amer­ica’s ally in the war, Israeli Prime Min­is­ter Ben­jamin Net­an­yahu, admit­ted Monday he hadn’t been provided with a copy of the agree­ment.

Vice Pres­id­ent JD Vance’s sales pitch for the Iran deal is simply ter­rible — but Pres­id­ent Trump’s may be worse. Maybe the report­ing on what’s in the Memor­andum of Under­stand­ing is wrong, but Team Trump keeps con­firm­ing some of the worst news. As best we can tell, the deal does noth­ing to achieve the aims Amer­ica star­ted the war with — but does hand Tehran a whole series of gains.

Iran gets at least a few bil­lion in imme­di­ate funds and can start selling oil right away, with at least some other sanc­tions dropped as well. More, it wins unpre­ced­en­ted author­ity over the Strait of Hor­muz and likely locks in Hezbol­lah’s dom­in­ance of Lebanon.

Recall our goals: The prez opened com­bat seek­ing to per­man­ently end Iran’s nuc­lear threat, and also elim­in­ate its mis­siles and other offens­ive cap­ab­il­it­ies, and we also hoped for regime change.

The bomb­ing set back its nuke pro­grams, took out a lot of mis­siles and mis­sile factor­ies and decap­it­ated most of the regime’s top lead­er­ship. All the talks since the start of April have done noth­ing more — indeed, have only let new Ira­nian lead­ers rebuild and regroup, even as the popu­lace suf­fers. Why will they change in 60 more days of talk?

Vance’s happy case is that the big prizes for Iran are con­tin­gent on its beha­vior; as he said on “Han­nity”: “If they’re will­ing to behave like a nor­mal coun­try,” quit chas­ing nukes and fund­ing ter­ror, “then we are will­ing to actu­ally fun­da­ment­ally trans­form our rela­tion­ship with them.” But that’s been true ever since the 1979 revolu­tion, and the regime has never gone for it.

Trump, talk­ing with Qatar’s ruler (!), actu­ally claimed the regime has changed, since we killed off so many lead­ers and those who wound up in charge “are very rational people,” “nice to deal with,” “not rad­ic­al­ized.”

Huh? It’s the lead­ers of the Islamic Revolu­tion­ary Guard Corps call­ing the shots over there now — the goons most com­mit­ted to the rad­ical agenda. Vance, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kush­ner never talked to them, only to polit­ical fronts for the real powers.

And it’s easy to be “nice” when the nego­ti­ations are hand­ing you win after win.

Trump’s proud that Tehran prom­ises to stick to only peace­ful nuc­lear pro­grams, but it’s never stopped mak­ing that prom­ise even as it’s never ceased doing the oppos­ite.

“We’ve never had this level of dir­ect com­mu­nic­a­tion with the Ira­nian lead­er­ship,” Vance bragged on “Han­nity.” Again: They weren’t talk­ing to the real lead­ers.

Sad­der still, he claimed: “We’re see­ing even people that I would have assumed are hard­liners who are kind of say­ing, ‘Maybe it was a mis­take for us to do the things that we’ve done over the last 40 years. Maybe we should turn over a new leaf in the rela­tion­ship with the United States of Amer­ica.’ ”

They were slaughter­ing 40,000 of their own civil­ians just months ago; sud­denly they’re going to get “nor­mal”?

No: “Hard­liner vs. mod­er­ate” is just a good cop-bad cop schtick the Ira­ni­ans have pulled on West­ern­ers for dec­ades — right along with pre­tend­ing regret over the past.

It’s bey­ond fool­ish to think the Ira­ni­ans have changed just because they say so.

It seems to us that Team Trump doesn’t want to use force to open the Strait, it’s pan­ick­ing over oil prices and the midterms and just wants to for­get its prom­ises to help the Ira­nian people.

We’d love to be proven wrong, and they haven’t given away the whole store yet. Other than the cash Tehran takes in at the start, Wash­ing­ton can with­draw its prom­ises as read­ily as the Ira­ni­ans always do theirs.

Cross your fin­gers that the next 60 days show that Iran really has changed — or that the prez and his brain­trust have come to their senses.“

No comments:

Post a Comment