Contact Me By Email

Contact Me By Email

Friday, September 11, 2026

After 9/11, Islamophobia Shaped a Generation of Muslim New Yorkers

  

After 9/11, Islamophobia Shaped a Generation of Muslim New Yorkers

“The attacks unleashed a wave of hate, but the years since have seen Muslim Americans’ political and cultural influence grow.

A man dressed in black poses for a portrait with his hands folded.
Murad Awawdeh, the president of the New York Immigration Coalition, turned to civil rights work in response to the backlash against Muslims after the Sept. 11 attacks.James Estrin/The New York Times

Once-friendly neighbors started to keep their distance. Undercover police officers began to monitor community events. And passers-by would give them dirty looks on the street, and sometimes harass them, when they left home in hijabs or other religious garb.

Many American Muslims have faced a quarter-century of suspicion and hostility since the Sept. 11 attacks, which reshaped life for all Americans.

In New York, a generation of Muslim New Yorkers responded to the Islamophobia by organizing their communities: Mosques hosted makeshift legal clinics. Small businesses became hubs in a citywide civil rights network. Muslims of different racial, ethnic and linguistic backgrounds formed alliances the city had not seen before.

Their political organizing helped, years later, to elect the city’s first Muslim mayor, Zohran Mamdani. But anti-Muslim prejudice still endures, echoing the Islamophobia that arose in the earliest days after Sept. 11.

Murad Awawdeh was 14 in September 2001. The post-9/11 backlash, and the grass-roots response of his friends and neighbors, led him to trade his biochemistry studies — and his mother’s American dream of having a doctor in the family — for a career in civil rights.

“I think that day belongs to everyone who lived it and what came after belongs to a smaller group of us,” said Mr. Awawdeh, 39, who is now the president and chief executive of the New York Immigration Coalition and a confidant of Mr. Mamdani. “That part of the story this country still has not told itself honestly.”

The Sept. 11 attacks left many Muslim American communities scarred by heavy-handed law enforcement tactics and the suspicion, if not outright hostility, of classmates, co-workers, elected officials and cable news commentators who blamed all Muslims for the terrorism they, too, had experienced that day. That experience spurred many to take political action.

“If you look at prior to 9/11, for the most part, Muslim Americans were not politically involved,” said Afaf Nasher, the executive director of the New York chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. But, she added, “When you’re pushed against the wall, you’re either going to run in fear or you’re going to push back, and political empowerment was certainly one way that we are pushing back.”

The ascendance of Mr. Mamdani has turned New York into perhaps the most prominent example of American Muslim success in the post-9/11 world. But the history of the city since the attacks has also highlighted the many challenges that Muslims in the United States continue to face.

Those include a history of police surveillance, backlash faced by high-profile Muslims in politics or the arts, and attacks on Islamic religious expression, including the construction of mosques and the wearing of religious clothinglike hijabs. Those biases have also affected followers of other faiths, in particular observant Sikh men, whose turbans are often mistaken for a form of Islamic dress.

Such sentiments have compounded in many ways since the start of the war in Gaza, which most Muslim Americans have vigorously opposed. Opponents of that war have been accused of terrorist sympathies, and some, including the Columbia University protester Mahmoud Khalil, have been arrested and threatened with deportation for their advocacy. That has led some Muslims to say the war in Gaza has created an environment akin to the months and years after Sept. 11, when Muslim Americans feared they could be marked as terrorist sympathizers for speaking out against the war on terror.

After Sept. 11, many Muslims in New York found themselves under covert police surveillance. Asad Dandia, 33, a public historian, was a plaintiff in a 2013 class-action lawsuit against the Police Department over its surveillance of the city’s Muslim neighborhoods, a program that was assisted by the Central Intelligence Agency.

He had come under police surveillance after starting a charity as a teenager to feed poor families in his neighborhood. The police spying program was exposed in 2011 and caused a public uproar that led to its ending by 2018 after a series of legal settlements and other initiatives.

Today, Mr. Dandia is the official historian of the borough of Brooklyn and an informal adviser to Mr. Mamdani. One of his lawyers in the 2013 lawsuit, Ramzi Kassem, is the mayor’s chief legal counsel.

“We went in the span of 10 years from suing the government to being the government,” Mr. Dandia said. “And I think that is a classic and quintessential New York and American story.”

Mr. Mamdani is one of several Muslims who have become prominent in American public life in recent years. Others include U.S. Representatives Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, the Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, the Academy Award-winning actor Mahershala Ali, the model Bella Hadid and the comedians Ramy Youssef and Hasan Minhaj.

“Muslim America now has a greater cultural footprint, more institutional power and a lot more support from allies, comrades and friends all throughout the country,” Mr. Dandia said. “Now when people think of Muslim America, they have names and faces they can point to.”

But despite these successes, many challenges remain. Mr. Mamdani, who was 9 years old on Sept. 11, has said the Islamophobic backlash to the attack lingered and “became a fact of life.”

According to a Pew Research Center survey conducted this year, 43 percent of American adults said Muslims are less patriotic than other Americans, and 42 percent said Muslim Americans are having a negative impact on the country. When asked to explain their views, respondents often cited the Sept. 11 attacks.

By some measures, the survey showed that public attitudes toward Islam were more negative now than they were immediately after the attacks. In March 2002, 25 percent of American adults said Islam is more likely than other religions to encourage violence, but that number had risen to 51 percent in the survey conducted this year.

Those views have become highly polarized, with Republicans expressing far more negative views of Islam than Democrats, a change from after the attacks when supporters of both parties held similar views. Today, anti-Muslim sentiments have surged anew in some parts of the country with almost every election cycle.

Donald J. Trump campaigned for president in 2016 on a pledge to bar immigrants from Muslim countries and has restricted immigration from those nations and others that he views negatively during both his first and second administrations. In his second term, Mr. Trump has cracked down on students and universities over protests against the war in Gaza, portraying student demonstrators as supporters of terrorism and equating their arguments with antisemitic hate speech.

That has included the arrest of young Muslim activists, including Mr. Khalil, a Columbia University protest leader, and Rumeysa Ozturk, who helped write an opinion piece critical of Israel for the student newspaper at Tufts University.

Kambiz GhaneaBassiri, a professor of religion and politics at Washington University in St. Louis, said the embrace of Islamophobia by the Trump administration posed a serious threat to Muslim Americans. But for Americans who are skeptical or critical of Mr. Trump, it may have also helped to undermine anti-Muslim arguments.

“People forget now the degree to which Islamophobia was not something that was just on the right but was present on both sides,” Mr. GhaneaBassiri said.

As an example of the reaction to Mr. Trump’s policies, he pointed to protests at airports against the president’s immigration restrictions in 2017 as a moment that “kind of shocked” some Muslim activists and organizations. They had become accustomed to pushing for their rights with few allies and little positive coverage in the news media, but the airport protests were filled with non-Muslims.

“Before that moment, if they criticized the state, their loyalty was always questioned by people on both the right and the left,” Mr. GhaneaBassiri said.

But in New York, Mr. Mamdani’s election has shown the resilience of anti-Muslim suspicion in both parties.

During last year’s mayoral campaign, Mr. Mamdani was accused of supporting terrorism by critics in both parties, including the campaign of former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, his main opponent in the race, and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, who apologized after she falsely claimed in an interview that he had made “references to global jihad.”

The hate is nothing new to the mayor’s allies. Shahana Hanif, who in 2021 was elected the first Muslim woman to the City Council, was in elementary school when the attacks took place. She came of age as American policy and cultural attitudes shifted against the nation’s Muslims.

At age 10, she wrote a letter to President George W. Bush asking him to put a stop to the hate that seemed to engulf so much of the country. For Ms. Hanif, a Bangladeshi native of Kensington, Brooklyn, it was an early form of political organizing that helped inform her political career decades later, particularly as her own neighborhood evolved to produce the city’s first Muslim city councilwoman.

“Seeing the injustice my community experienced” propelled her into progressive political organizing, Ms. Hanif said. “I can’t take away the Muslim part of it and just say, ‘Oh, no, this is only happening to us because we’re Bangladeshi immigrants,’ or ‘this is only happening to us because I’m a daughter of immigrants or I’m a woman of color,’” she said. “That association of being Muslim is certainly part of it.”

New York’s Muslim political and civil rights leaders said they also see opportunities to keep building on their post-9/11 organizing work, not just for other members of their faith but for the next group that may be targeted.

Ms. Nasher, the executive director of CAIR, said that her group and others like it see their efforts as an outgrowth of the discrimination they faced and a way to guard against it happening to others.

“That’s not just because we’re Muslim — it’s because we’re American,” she said. “And you would think that as our fellow Americans, people would want every American to be politically engaged.”

Liam Stack is a Times reporter who covers the culture and politics of the New York City region.

Maya King is a Times reporter who writes about the intersection of politics, religion and ritual in New York City.“

Thursday, September 10, 2026

Trump faces growing scrutiny over ‘profoundly concerning’ cash gifts for aides including Natalie Harp | US news | The Guardian

Trump faces growing scrutiny over ‘profoundly concerning’ cash gifts for aides including Natalie Harp

"The payments amounted to 30% of each aides’ $150,000 annual salary

two men and a woman walk out of a helicopter
Donald Trump's executive assistant Natalie Harp disembarks Marine One to board Air Force One, en route to Houston, Texas, at Joint Base Andrews on 27 August 2026. Photograph: Kylie Cooper/Reuters

Donald Trump may have committed “serious” ethical violations by giving three officials including his close personal aide Natalie Harp cash gifts of $45,000 each, according to a former White House “ethics czar”, as a watchdog group called for an investigation.

The nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center filed a complaint with the US Office of Government Ethics over the US president’s handouts to a handful of staff, arguing that an investigation is “clearly warranted”.

Norm Eisen, who was a special counsel to Barack Obama for ethics and government reform, said the payments were a possible breach of regulation 18 USC 209, a federal conflict of interest statute that prohibits the US government’s executive branch employees from receiving payment beyond their salary for performing their official duties.

The US president appeared to disregard that provision when he presented the payments to Harp, Chamberlain Harris and Margo Martin. The three aides reported the money on their financial disclosure forms as a “cash gift for holiday”.

The payments amounted to 30% of each of the aides’ $150,000 annual salary. The Washington Post first reported the story.

The White House has denied that they represent a breach of ethical codes.

But Eisen said the denials strained credibility. “It appears to raise the most serious issues under 18 USC 209, which prohibits supplementation of income,” he said. “The White House denies that these payments represent income supplementation but that is hard to believe under the circumstances.

“We’re not talking about some small gift or minor trinket, but about large sums.”

James Thurber, another ethics specialist and a founder and former director of American University’s Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies, called the payments “legal but totally unethical”, adding in an email: “This is nothing new for Trump.”

“The American public has a right to know where government employees’ loyalties lie,” said Kedric Payne, vice-president, general counsel and senior director for ethics at Campaign Legal Center. “Laws prohibiting government employees from receiving supplemental income are not arbitrary; they exist to ensure that public servants’ priorities remain focused on public service, not a wealthy benefactor who may have other objectives in mind.

“An investigation into this matter is clearly warranted, and, if a violation is indeed found, this matter must be referred to the Department of Justice.”

The statute states: “Whoever receives any salary, or any contribution to or supplementation of salary, as compensation for his services as an officer or employee of the executive branch of the United States government … from any source other than the government of the United States, except as may be contributed out of the treasury of any State, county, or municipality … shall be subject to … penalties.”

These can include fines or imprisonment, depending on whether the breach was deliberate. The burden falls on both the giver and recipients of any payment deemed illicit.

Eisen – now executive chair of the Democracy Defenders Fund, a non-profit group that has filed multiple law suit against the Trump administration – added: “There is a reason for these rules: we want our government employees first loyalty to be to the United States, and not to whoever happens to be its president. This is profoundly concerning.”

The White House did not respond to requests for a response to Eisen’s comments.

Harp, 35, who has been dubbed the “human printer” after she was said to carry a portable device to print out social media posts and articles favorable to Trump, has been the subject of recent public scrutiny because of the nature and intensity of her relationship with him.

She was revealed to have sent the president gushing emails and accompanied him when he stealthily switched planes via a catering truck after a Nato summit in Turkey on the basis of a supposed assassination threat from Iran.

Martin, a 31-year-old communications adviser, films Trump’s daily activities for social media posts. Harris, 26, is an executive assistant and was appointed last February to the US Commission of Fine Arts, which oversees Trump’s pet projects, including his controversial White House ballroom.

Additionally, Walt Nauta, the director of Oval Office operations, reported a $20,000 gift from Trump. Nauta, who earns an annual salary of $175,000, also accompanied the president on the plane switch. He served as a valet during Trump’s first presidency and was a key witness and defendant in the Department of Justice’s investigation of Trump’s handling of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago home, led by the special prosecutor Jack Smith."

Trump faces growing scrutiny over ‘profoundly concerning’ cash gifts for aides including Natalie Harp | US news | The Guardian

Trump Dangles $5,000 Payments if Republicans Win, and Deportees Are Stranded in Haiti - The New York Times

Trump Dangles $5,000 Payments if Republicans Win, and Deportees Are Stranded in Haiti

Plus, the secretive operation to move a 900-year-old masterpiece.

This transcript was created using speech recognition software. While it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it may contain errors. Please review the episode audio before quoting from this transcript and email transcripts@nytimes.com with any questions.

tracy mumford

From “The New York Times,” it’s “The Headlines.” I’m Tracy Mumford. Today’s Thursday, September 10. Here’s what we’re covering.

president donald j. trump

If we lose, you’re going to lose your border. You’re going to lose your tax cuts. You’re going to lose your safety and security. You’re going to lose your wealth.

tracy mumford

Last night in Dallas, President Trump kicked off the GOP’s first of its kind midterm convention as his party stares down the possibility of major losses in November.

president donald j. trump

So I’m asking you to pretend that I’m on the ballot. I’m on the ballot.

tracy mumford

In a prime time, made-for-TV speech, Trump repeatedly urged Republican voters to turn out the same way they have when he’s been a candidate. And he also tossed out a new idea to try and get people to the polls. If the Republicans win, you with with us, and you get $5,000. It will be called the Trump Dividend.

Trump claimed he would send a $5,000 check to every American adult if Republicans keep control of Congress.

president donald j. trump

Now, all we have to do — now, all we have to do is win. Under my leadership —

tracy mumford

The president has made similar promises in the past to send out cash, which haven’t actually happened. This plan would likely cost more than $1 trillion and would need sign off from Congress. In all, over the nearly two-hour speech, the president largely dismissed the issues that have been weighing down his party in the polls. He shrugged off concerns about affordability, high gas prices, the rising cost of groceries, et cetera, as quote, “fake.” And he said the US is winning the war with Iran, which has been broadly unpopular with voters. In addition to Trump, a whole list of Republican candidates and lawmakers also took the stage.

representative tom emmer

This is an election between common sense and communism, between America-loving patriots and hate-America extremists.

tracy mumford

For the most part, they avoided talking about the war, instead going on the offensive.

senator tim scott

We face the most dangerous, radical, and frankly weird Democrat candidates in American history.

tracy mumford

Overall, the messaging at the convention so far has not been directed at potentially undecided voters who could ultimately end up making the difference in some very competitive races. Instead, it’s been aimed at trying to boost enthusiasm among the MAGA voters who have generally gone to the polls in presidential elections but not in midterms.

[THEME MUSIC]

Now, two quick updates on the Trump administration, from cash gifts for White House staff to a proposal that could append the census. First, financial disclosure forms from the White House show the president gave $45,000 each to his executive assistant, Natalie Harp and two other close aides. Each payment was recorded as a, quote, “cash gift for the holidays” last year, and is equal to about a third of the staffers’ salaries. The disclosure raises questions about whether the gifts violate the federal government’s policy against political appointees getting bonuses. That policy exists, one ethics expert told “The Times,” to prevent even the appearance that a federal employee would feel more beholden to the person giving them cash than to the public.

In addition to Harp, the group who received cash gifts from Trump includes Chamberlain Harris, his former receptionist, who he installed on a federal commission where she greenlit his ballroom project and pushed for a gold coin with his face on it. In a statement posted on social media, the White House said the gifts were allowed because they, quote, “have nothing to do with any of these individuals’ official government duties.”

And the Trump administration is proposing overhauling the census by no longer counting immigrants unless they have green cards. Historically, the census has counted all US residents. The 14th Amendment lays that out, calling for the counting of, quote, “the whole number of persons in each state.” Those numbers get used to determine how many congressional seats states get and where billions of dollars of federal money are allocated.

While the proposal is likely to face legal challenges, if it goes through for the 2030 census, areas with more immigrants, which tend to vote Democratic, could lose representation and funding. The administration also wants to remove questions about race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation from the census, which could have major implications for anti-discrimination policies and civil rights protections. The White House referred questions about the changes to the Commerce Department, which oversees the census. The Department did not respond.

[THEME MUSIC]

In Haiti. deportation flights from the US that used to land once a month are now landing once a week, as the Trump administration ramps up its efforts to expel some of the 300,000-plus Haitians who, until recently, had temporary protected status. Since July, hundreds of people, some of them with criminal records, have been put on planes to the city of Cap-Haitien.

frances robles

I went to Cap-Haitien last week. The flights arrive on Thursdays. And after the people are processed at the airport, they go to the local police station for background checks. So I spent a few hours there talking to dozens of people who were just kind of in shock.

tracy mumford

My colleague, Frances Robles, covers Haiti, where she said violent gangs still control portions of the country, though the Trump administration has deemed it safe enough to send people back. She says some of the deportees told her they were scared for their safety. Many others said they were upset because some of their belongings had disappeared in the chaos.

frances robles

Upon arrival in Haiti, the bags often were missing the most valuable items. So people’s cell phones, their passports, jewelry. Other people lost money. Like, maybe they had cash on them when they were arrested by ICE, and it gets put on some kind of debit card, but then the debit card was not given to them, was not provided. So some people lost thousands of dollars. A lot of other people told me they were arrested with such little notice, they didn’t get to go home. They didn’t get to go home and pack their things. They didn’t get to go to the bank.

So they were kind of stranded with no money. And these people, in their US government-issued sweatpants and white T-shirts, were basically sleeping on the floor. They said that they didn’t even have a bathroom to use. And the Haitian government kind of acknowledged it. They acknowledged that they weren’t ready. And they’re really concerned that these people are going to wind up homeless in their city. The police official said to me, he said, go outside. You’re going to find them outside the police station. They’d have nowhere to go.

tracy mumford

After interviewing the migrants, Frances says she asked Haitian immigration officials and the Department of Homeland Security about why some deportees belongings had gone missing. The Haitian officials didn’t respond to the request for comment, and the DHS said the migrants’ property had been returned upon their arrival.

[THEME MUSIC]

And finally.

alex marshall

This year in London, the hottest art show by miles is the Bayeux Tapestry at the British Museum, which opens today. And you wouldn’t really expect a historical artifact to generate as much hype as this has. But here, it seems like the entire nation has been gripped by Bayeux fever. All the tickets are sold out through the end of the year. It really is the one thing everyone wants to see.

tracy mumford

My colleague Alex Marshall covers culture for “The Times.” He says people are losing their minds for a tapestry — yes, a tapestry, because this one is nearly 1,000 years old and stretches more than 200 feet long. And while a lot of surviving medieval tapestries are just faded fragments, this one is shockingly intact. In a series of scenes that seem straight out of “Game of Thrones,” it shows William the Conqueror rampaging through Britain. We’re talking arrows through eyeballs and heads getting chopped off, all delicately embroidered on the tapestry.

Despite depicting a key moment in British history, it has been kept in Bayeux, France, where it gets its name, for centuries, and people thought it would never make it back to Britain. Alex says it took a huge feat of diplomacy to get it on loan to the British Museum and an elaborate, secretive effort to make sure that the very fragile artifact would survive the trip.

alex marshall

Normally when you move an artwork, you put it in the back of a truck, and then you just drive it from one museum to the other. Maybe it has one person accompany it. But for this, it had an army of people involved. They first had to get it off display in France, which involved 100 technicians lined up just a few centimeters apart along the entire length of the tapestry to gently lift it and put it into a foldable case specially built for this embroidery so that it could be stored securely. And that took hours.

Once it was in this case, that was then put into the back of a truck. It was surrounded by all these vibration dampening springs that are usually used in earthquake zones. They then had to do test runs to work out where the biggest potholes would be and the biggest bumps, so they could try and counter those. And then once they got it to Britain, they had to then do an equally delicate operation to get it out of all its casing and to get it onto a display table.

Around the tapestry’s loan, there’s been this big split among conservators about whether this was a good thing. Lots of people were opposed to the loan, almost as a matter of principle. They say, well, masterpieces should not be moved. If there’s any risk, it could damage them. You’re going to lessen the life of a part of world history. And because of that, you should just keep it where it is, almost under lock and key. But many people say the purpose of conservation is to ensure these artworks can be seen. And, in fact, can be seen by the most people possible who will be excited by it. And in that case, doing this loan to a museum where it might be seen by over a million people in just a few months is the best thing that can happen to this tapestry.

tracy mumford

Those are “The Headlines.” Today, on “The Daily,” a look at the contentious new question dividing courts and couples across the country — If you break up, who gets custody of your embryos? You can listen to that in the New York Times app or wherever you get your podcasts. I’m Tracy Mumford. We’ll be back tomorrow with the latest and the Friday News Quiz.

Trump Dangles $5,000 Payments if Republicans Win, and Deportees Are Stranded in Haiti - The New York Times