Contact Me By Email

Contact Me By Email

Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts

Saturday, December 04, 2010

Chuck Schumer exerts new power in tax fight - Manu Raju - POLITICO.com

Charles Schumer, United States Senator from Ne...Image via WikipediaChuck Schumer exerts new power in tax fight - Manu Raju - POLITICO.com

New York Sen. Chuck Schumer is wasting little time assuming his new power in the Senate leadership over the Democrats' message, seizing the reins of the tax debate by sharpening attacks against Republicans and effectively intensifying the partisan rancor in the upper chamber.

In the past few days, the New York legislator has stepped into the spotlight to bombard Republicans with charges that they are protecting millionaires and billionaires. Flanked by several Democratic colleagues, Schumer has led two news conferences in the past two days, launching fierce criticism against his foes, with the two men who serve above him in the Senate leadership — Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) — noticeably absent.

Schumer’s colleagues, too, have picked up on a stylistic change from the past two years where he’d been acting as more of a behind-the-scenes, bipartisan dealmaker and less as the political attack machine that’s long defined him. But in recent days, Schumer — seen as a potential successor to Reid — has taken on a highly visible role on the Senate floor, attacking the Republican position in stark terms and directly repudiating GOP senators’ claims.

“We’re not sitting around waiting to get our head kicked in everyday; we’re going to present our ideas, win or lose,” said Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska), in discussing Schumer’s new role. “If people are for them, they are for them, if they are against them, they are against them. … We’re not just going to sit in the backrooms and figure out how to cave in.”

Schumer’s latest positioning comes in the wake of an idea he floated last month on CBS’s “Face the Nation” after it had been quietly kicked around the Democratic caucus for months: to extend the Bush-era tax cuts for every income bracket except for those making more than $1 million annually. In the intervening weeks, Schumer has worked aggressively behind the scenes to sell the plan to skeptical members of his caucus and make the case that it would clearly define the GOP as the party on the side of the richest Americans.

But the plan had little chance of passing — and it failed to advance on a 53-37 vote Saturday — and now the Democrats are faced with the real prospect of having to extend all of the Bush-era tax cuts — particularly as the White House is seeking a wide-ranging year-end compromise on issues ranging from appropriations legislation to a nuclear arms treaty with Russia.

“Chuck Schumer is not the only Democrat that engages in the kind of rhetoric that fosters class warfare,” Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) said Saturday. “If the program of the Democrats is to fire up the rhetoric and try to draw those sharp dividing lines in a way that prevent the kind of bipartisan agreement that we’re talking about and that we talked about with the president, then that won’t be helpful.”

Earlier this week when all 42 Republicans threatened to block all legislative business until deals were reached on taxes and spending, Schumer helped orchestrate his party’s response: Democratic senators would go to the floor one-by-one and propose a number of bills aimed at creating jobs. When Republicans objected, Democrats pounded them for blocking action to reverse the alarming jobless rate.


“I think the Republicans kind of walked themselves off the cliff on this one,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) said, citing the tax vote in particular.

Schumer’s stepped-up presence comes after a leadership shuffle announced by Reid following the Nov. 2 elections, where Democrats lost six Senate seats and control of the House. Responding to concerns that the Senate Democrats lacked an effective messaging operation, Reid announced that he would give Schumer the role of running the party’s “war room” while also naming him chairman of the Democratic Policy Committee.

Frustrated Democrats have held scores of hours-long air-clearing caucus meetings since Election Day to figure out how to win the political war against Republicans in the Senate — particularly since their party has 23 seats up for grabs in the 2012 elections while the GOP only has 10. A number of Democrats have pushed for the leadership and the White House to take a more aggressive and partisan approach to the GOP because, they say, the GOP has shown little willingness to compromise.

The leadership shuffle — where Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) will also serve as Schumer’s vice chairwoman, Begich will serve as Steering and Outreach Committee chairman and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) will head the campaign arm — represents Reid’s efforts to improve the party’s political apparatus and get greater buy-in from newer members.

While the changes don’t officially take place until next year, Democrats and Republicans already are noticing a shift in Schumer’s approach.

“I don’t think it was your imagination —– nor mine,” Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) said.

In the Saturday news conference, Schumer signaled that the party’s new approach over the tax votes — which they had initially put off until after the Nov. 2 elections — is a sign of things to come.

“In the past, when Democrats had these kinds of cases, we have sort of thrown up our hands,” Schumer said. “We’re not going to.”

Whether he has success in his new role could affect his standing ahead of any future leadership race against Durbin, another potential Reid successor who voted against the Schumer plan because of deficit concerns.

Asked if he was already stepping into his new position, Schumer told POLITICO: “I’m not going to talk about anything to do with roles. I’m going to talk about the issues.”

But the real test for Schumer could rest on whether his party ends up getting what it wants in the end on policy — and effectively sells that to voters.

Democrats are clearly divided on what to do next over the Bush-era tax cuts, which expire at year’s end. Schumer suggested the party could benefit politically by pinning the blame on the GOP and allowing the tax cuts to expire.

But it seems likely that Democrats will back an extension of all the Bush tax cuts for two years, a move that would represent a big political win for the GOP.

Top Republicans said Saturday that Schumer’s approach has amounted to little more than political theater that distracted from real efforts to broker a compromise.

“I think it’s an example of political power techniques, and if this is the way they’re going to do things next year, why we won’t get much done,” said Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander, the Senate GOP’s message man.

Even some Democrats weren’t enamored with Schumer’s proposal to extend tax cuts to all but those making more than $1 million. For months, the party has hammered the GOP for wanting to extend rates to everyone except families earning more than $250,000 a year — saying it would add enormous strain to the mountainous budget deficit.

But over the next decade, Schumer’s proposal could add $300 billion to $400 billion more to the national debt than a separate Democratic plan, which would raise taxes on anything beyond the first $250,000 of family income. It, too, failed Saturday by a 53-36 vote.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, October 25, 2010

Bill Clinton 'disturbed and ticked off' - Andy Barr - POLITICO.com

Official White House photo of President Bill C...Image via WikipediaBill Clinton 'disturbed and ticked off' - Andy Barr - POLITICO.com
Former President Bill Clinton is "disturbed and ticked off" by much of what he's seen from the midterm election campaign.
Speaking at a rally for 28-term incumbent Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) Sunday, Clinton said argued “right-wing rhetoric” against government spending does not accurately frame how Democrats have tried to aid a country still reeling from a recession, and showed frustration that the attacks against Democrats seems to have stuck.
"I almost gag when I hear these Republicans lambasting the president and the Democrats in Congress, 'Oh, they're such big spenders, they're just crazy, they're quasi-socialist,'" he said during the rally at the University of Michigan. "I have a simple question: Who's the last president to give you a balanced budget?
“I like all this enthusiasm, but frankly there are a few things about this election that have gotten me somewhere between disturbed and ticked off,” he added.

Saturday, October 09, 2010

Reigniting the passion of African American voters is key to Democrats' hopes - WPHL

Reigniting the passion of African American voters is key to Democrats' hopes - WPHL
Black turnout will play a crucial role as political momentum has shifted from the 'Yes We Can' crowd to the 'tea party' movement. In North Carolina, one moderate congressman tries to rally support.
By Richard Fausset, Los Angeles Times
Two years ago, Rep. Larry Kissell, a moderate freshman Democrat, was among a number of congressmen who received a boost from voters, particularly African Americans who turned out to make history and elect the first black president. This year, in a district that is 28% black, Kissell is challenged with reigniting those passions — when failure to do so could help tip Congress into Republican hands.
In this struggling textile town, conversations with black voters demonstrated how difficult Kissell's job may be. Yarn mill worker Ray Ellison, 55, voted for Barack Obama in 2008 — when a record 61% of voting-age African Americans went to the polls — but didn't know if he'd be voting again this November.
Ellison said he had missed a number of elections when the presidency wasn't at stake. "I really have to be pushed to vote," he said.
Barber John McPhatter, 48, said he'd probably vote this time around. But he was less than enthusiastic about Kissell after the congressman voted against the president's signature healthcare overhaul legislation.
"I may just close my eyes and pull the lever for him, even though I know about the things he's done," he said.
Energizing black voters for midterm elections has always been a challenge for Democrats. This fall the Democratic National Committee plans to spend more than $2 million in outreach ads and direct mail to black voters, more than 10 times the amount spent in 2006, said Derrick Plummer, who heads up African American affairs for the DNC.
_________________________________________
There is at much at stake in this election as there was in the election of 2008, if not more. A loss of the House of Representatives would be a catastrophic event for the economic prospects of poor, blue collar and lower middle class Americans. African Americans are largely a part of these groups. African American voter turnout can make the difference in who controls congress for the next two tears. Everyone, black, white, yellow, red or green. Please vote on november 2, 2010.
John H. Armwood