Advance proofs of Jill Lepore's new book, The Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party's Revolution and the Battle over American History, forthcoming in September from Princeton University Press, arrived earlier this week as something of a surprise. The book was not listed in the press's new catalog, and her previous works, including The Name of War (1998) and New York Burning (2005), were published by Knopf. Curious about how Lepore, a professor of American history at Harvard University (and a novelist), settled on Princeton, I got in touch with Brigitta van Rheinberg, editor-in-chief of the press. More...
A collection of opinionated commentaries on culture, politics and religion compiled predominantly from an American viewpoint but tempered by a global vision. My Armwood Opinion Youtube Channel @ YouTube I have a Jazz Blog @ Jazz and a Technology Blog @ Technology. I have a Human Rights Blog @ Law
Monday, July 26, 2010
Harvard Prof Takes Aim at the Tea Party - The Chronicle of Higher Education
Harvard Prof Takes Aim at the Tea Party - The Chronicle of Higher Education
Howard Dean: No More Apologies -- It's Time to Stand Up for Our Convictions
Howard Dean: No More Apologies -- It's Time to Stand Up for Our Convictions
For some time now, various "reporters" and on-air personalities on the Fox News Network have failed to report the full story or relevant facts, instead indulging in race baiting in order to exploit people's fears and crank up the fringe of their audience. This was exemplified by Glenn Beck's nightly assault on Van Jones earlier this year. Recently, Fox has cranked up stories about the Department of Justice's decision not to prosecute a voter intimidation case against a Black Panther group and even worse, calls for Atty. General Holder's resignation. And now, the Sherrod Debacle.
Turns out Van Jones' name was added to a website without his permission, a fact the group finally admitted some time after he resigned. And maybe he said some things about the Republican Party that he shouldn't have -- but that has nothing to do with the fact that he is a brilliant environmental organizer. It also turns out that it was the Bush Administration who decided not to prosecute the case against the black panthers because as Bush's Assistant Attorney General Perez testified, "the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statues, and under the Obama Administration Justice Department a judgment was won in a civil case.
And by now we all know how the Sherrod story went down. Despite his claims to the contrary on Fox News Sunday, Chris Wallace didn't have his facts quite right. As a media matters study showed, Fox News did in fact spend a lot of air-time on July 19th and 20th cranking up the false story. Not to mention that foxnews.com bragged that shortly after they posted a "report" about the video Mrs. Sherrod resigned.
None of this is new. I don't believe all or even most of the Republican party voters are racist, but going at least as far back as Lee Atwater, the Willie Horton ads, and the attacks on John McCain in the South Carolina primaries in both 2000 and 2008, the immigration debate in 2006, there is a persistent willingness in the Republican party to use race baiting for electoral advantage. The fact is, this is racist behavior.
Now if the Tea Party, which is not a professional group of politicians have the decency to repudiate the racist fringe in their group, why can't the Republicans? Obviously they think this approach works on the margins, but even if this stuff works, it sure doesn't produce good leaders or a civil society, and it certainly doesn't produce a stronger America, it produces an even more polarized and angry America. It's that willingness to put party ahead of country that has the Republicans in such low regard.
There are lessons to be learned here. Tom Vilsack stated the first one best: don't make decisions without all the facts. To that I would add: consider the source. If it is a group of individuals or a corporation that has chronically ignored the facts and engaged in race baiting in the past, they are likely to do it again. A report by Fox News, Breitbart or Matt Drudge, ought to have -- as it does in most people's minds -- little credibility.
The second lesson is harder. Stand up for what you believe in. I admire Nancy Pelosi because she is tough, gets things done, and doesn't take crap from the right wing or any one else. After the year and a half this country has just been through, it is pretty obvious that the right-wing has no intention of cooperating with anyone, and that they will do anything to regain power, just as they were willing to do anything to hold on to it. The only reasonable approach is to stand up to them as you would any group of bullies. Call them out for what they do- or don't do as the case may be. If the Tea Party can call out some of their own members, surely we can call out a group of people who have put their party ahead of their country.
I have often said the biggest problem with the Democrats is that we are not tough enough. Now is the time to be tough. The fact is that the stimulus package has reduced unemployment from where it would have otherwise been in this Bush-induced recession (based on policies most of the Republicans now in Congress voted for). The fact is, as 60 members of the House and the CBO showed last week, the Public Option, or Medicare Buy-in, as it should more correctly be called, would have reduced the deficit over ten years by an additional $68 million dollars. The fact is that President Obama -- despite Republicans killing the climate change bill -- has done more in 18 months to change America's approach to the environment and green jobs than any president in memory.
The fact is that if we are going to tackle the deficit, it makes no sense to cut taxes for people with plenty of money while we tell people who depend on Social Security and Medicare that they have to do with less, or to play games with unemployment insurance for those who need it most.
The fact is that the Democrats won the election in 2008. The Republicans refuse to do anything for the country except say "no". That means we have to work hard and do what we believe is right. And we have to stop apologizing for it. We have to stand up for what we believe in and stop trying to make deals with people who cannot be trusted to make deals for the good of our country. It's not too late to win in 2010. Conviction politics works. Just ask the right wing!
Related articles by Zemanta
- Howard Dean tells Fox: Your coverage of Sherrod was racist (videocafe.crooksandliars.com)
- Howard Dean Calls Fox News Racist, Chris Wallace Strikes Back (newsbusters.org)
Sunday, July 25, 2010
The Secret Town Fed By The Underground Railroad : NPR
The Secret Town Fed By The Underground Railroad : NPR
Related articles by Zemanta
- What Was The Underground Railroad? (socyberty.com)
- Social Studies Lesson Plan: Using the National Geographic Underground Railroad Site (brighthub.com)
Op-Ed Columnist - You’ll Never Believe What This White House Is Missing - NYTimes.com
Op-Ed Columnist - You’ll Never Believe What This White House Is Missing - NYTimes.com
By MAUREEN DOWD
WASHINGTON
The Obama White House is too white.
It has Barack Obama, raised in the Hawaiian hood and Indonesia, and Valerie Jarrett, who spent her early years in Iran.
But unlike Bill Clinton, who never needed help fathoming Southern black culture, Obama lacks advisers who are descended from the central African-American experience, ones who understand “the slave thing,” as a top black Democrat dryly puts it.
The first black president should expand beyond his campaign security blanket, the smug cordon of overprotective white guys surrounding him — a long political tradition underscored by Geraldine Ferraro in 1984 when she complained about the “smart-ass white boys” from Walter Mondale’s campaign who tried to boss her around.
Otherwise, this administration will keep tripping over race rather than inspiring on race.
The West Wing white guys who pushed to ditch Shirley Sherrod before Glenn Beck could pounce not only didn’t bother to Google, they weren’t familiar enough with civil rights history to recognize the name Sherrod. And they didn’t return the calls and e-mail of prominent blacks who tried to alert them that something was wrong.
Charles Sherrod, Shirley’s husband, was a Freedom Rider who, along with the civil rights hero John Lewis, was a key member of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee of the ‘60s.
As Lewis, the longtime Georgia congressman, told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, he knew immediately that something was amiss with the distorted video clip of Sherrod talking to the N.A.A.C.P.
“I’ve known these two individuals — the husband for more than 50 years and the wife for at least 35, 40 — and there’s not a racist hair on their heads or anyplace else on their bodies,” Lewis said.
We may not have a “nation of cowards” on race, as Attorney General Eric Holder contended, but we may have a West Wing of cowards on race.
The president appears completely comfortable in his own skin, but it seems he feels that he and Michelle are such a huge change for the nation to absorb that he can be overly cautious about pushing for other societal changes for blacks and gays. At some level, he acts like the election was enough; he shouldn’t have to deal with race further. But he does.
His closest advisers — some of the same ones who urged him not to make the race speech after the Rev. Jeremiah Wright issue exploded — are so terrified that Fox and the Tea Party will paint Obama as doing more for blacks that they tiptoe around and do less. “Who knew that the first black president would make it even harder on black people?” asked a top black Democratic official.
Related articles by Zemanta
James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege - WSJ.com
James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege - WSJ.com
Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege
America still owes a debt to its black citizens, but government programs to help all 'people of color' are unfair. They should end.
By JAMES WEBB
The NAACP believes the tea party is racist. The tea party believes the NAACP is racist. And Pat Buchanan got into trouble recently by pointing out that if Elena Kagan is confirmed to the Supreme Court, there will not be a single Protestant Justice, although Protestants make up half the U.S. population and dominated the court for generations.
Forty years ago, as the United States experienced the civil rights movement, the supposed monolith of White Anglo-Saxon Protestant dominance served as the whipping post for almost every debate about power and status in America. After a full generation of such debate, WASP elites have fallen by the wayside and a plethora of government-enforced diversity policies have marginalized many white workers. The time has come to cease the false arguments and allow every American the benefit of a fair chance at the future.
I have dedicated my political career to bringing fairness to America's economic system and to our work force, regardless of what people look like or where they may worship. Unfortunately, present-day diversity programs work against that notion, having expanded so far beyond their original purpose that they now favor anyone who does not happen to be white.
In an odd historical twist that all Americans see but few can understand, many programs allow recently arrived immigrants to move ahead of similarly situated whites whose families have been in the country for generations. These programs have damaged racial harmony. And the more they have grown, the less they have actually helped African-Americans, the intended beneficiaries of affirmative action as it was originally conceived.
__________________________________________________
This is a provocative article by a very conservative Virginia senator. It's biggest flaw is that it is not based upon any hard evidence or factual data. It is a political viewpoint, not a piece of academic scholarship. In spite of his cursory understanding of American history Webb does make one crucial pont which is that African Americans hold a unique position in American society. I, however, do not think that he clearly understands the extent to which African American are different from other minorities and the the importance of that unique American history, having been the victims of a historically unique, multi-generational genocide that occurred right here in America. He does point out that racial progress has only benefited a small group of African Americans, but his real concern seems to be for his political base who are poor whites.
While discussing the long history of poor whites in America he fails to realize that blacks have been in America equally as long as their white brethren. African American have been in America from the earliest days of the colonization of this continent. No group in America has had their families systematically destroyed and their both their labor and bodies stolen from their own personal control under the color of law. This multi-generational genocide only began to end as a result of the African American "Civil Right's Movement" which resulted in congress passing the historic Civil Rights Act of 1964, The voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Immigration Reform Act of 1965.
There is an always has been white privilege in America. Whites with equal education levels with African American still earn substantially more than their black counterparts though the gap has narrowed. In this current economic downturn African American unemployment is nearly double the rate of white unemployment. These are basic facts that Mr. Webb should consider when he seeks to debunk what he calls "the Myth of white Privilege. Statistical data clearly demonstrates that white privilege remains a fact of life in America despite Senator Webb's misguided fantasies. Look at this study,Unemployment in black and white, a March 2010 presentation made before the Congressional Black Caucus. I have linked another April 2010 article, Statistics show employment rate gap between black and white male graduates. An op-ed editorial does not alter factual reality. Senator Webb should take the time to do his homework and research facts prior drawing such unsubstantiated conclusions, if his motivation is to present the truth as opposed to desiring to simply engage in political posturing.
John H. Armwood
Related articles by Zemanta
- "The OFFS Awards: Senator and Concern Troll Jim Webb" and related posts (shakespearessister.blogspot.com)
Court Under Roberts Is Most Conservative in Decades - NYTimes.com
WASHINGTON — When Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and his colleagues on the Supreme Court left for their summer break at the end of June, they marked a milestone: the Roberts court had just completed its fifth term.
In those five years, the court not only moved to the right but also became the most conservative one in living memory, based on an analysis of four sets of political science data.
And for all the public debate about the confirmation of Elena Kagan or the addition last year of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, there is no reason to think they will make a difference in the court’s ideological balance. Indeed, the data show that only one recent replacement altered its direction, that of Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in 2006, pulling the court to the right.
There is no similar switch on the horizon. That means that Chief Justice Roberts, 55, is settling in for what is likely to be a very long tenure at the head of a court that seems to be entering a period of stability.
If the Roberts court continues on the course suggested by its first five years, it is likely to allow a greater role for religion in public life, to permit more participation by unions and corporations in elections and to elaborate further on the scope of the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms. Abortion rights are likely to be curtailed, as are affirmative action and protections for people accused of crimes.
The recent shift to the right is modest. And the court’s decisions have hardly been uniformly conservative. The justices have, for instance, limited the use of the death penalty and rejected broad claims of executive power in the government’s efforts to combat terrorism.
But scholars who look at overall trends rather than individual decisions say that widely accepted political science data tell an unmistakable story about a notably conservative court.
Related articles by Zemanta
- "Almost all judicial decisions... can be assigned an ideological value." (althouse.blogspot.com)
- Rulings on guns, campaign finance mark court's term, influence of Alito (washingtontimes.com)
- News Analysis: Roberts Put His Stamp on Supreme Court in Latest Term (nytimes.com)
- Republicans line up to oppose Kagan (capitolhillblue.com)
- "Court Under Roberts Is Most Conservative in Decades" and related posts (voxverax.blogspot.com)
National Journal Magazine - The Gray And The Brown: The Generational Mismatch
National Journal Magazine - The Gray And The Brown: The Generational Mismatch
A CONTRAST IN PRIORITIES IS ARISING BETWEEN NONWHITE YOUNG VOTERS AND WHITE, OLDER VOTERS.
Saturday, July 24, 2010
by Ronald Brownstein
In an age of diminished resources, the United States may be heading for an intensifying confrontation between the gray and the brown.
Two of the biggest demographic trends reshaping the nation in the 21st century increasingly appear to be on a collision course that could rattle American politics for decades. From one direction, racial diversity in the United States is growing, particularly among the young. Minorities now make up more than two-fifths of all children under 18, and they will represent a majority of all American children by as soon as 2023, demographer William Frey of the Brookings Institution predicts.
_________________________________________________
This is a fascinating analysis of changing racial demographics in America and its political repercussions. There is an excellent interactive graph which illustrates this change. One must however not make simplistic assumptions that racial and ethnic minorities think and act alike or even share common political agenda. There are obvious areas of conflict between ethnic minorities on issues of education policy and over blue collar jobs. Even with this caveat this is an interesting piece.
John H. Armwood
Related articles by Zemanta
- National Journal Magazine - Do 'Family Values' Weaken Families? (nationaljournal.com)
- Fournier Leaves Associated Press for Atlantic Media (mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com)
- The Language-Mismatch Chronicles Go On (theatlantic.com)
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Journalism Legend Daniel Schorr Dies At 93 : NPR
Click the link below to listen to the full program
Daniel Schorr, a longtime senior news analyst for NPR and a veteran Washington journalist who broke major stories at home and abroad during the Cold War and Watergate, has died. He was 93.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Journalism pioneer Daniel Schorr dies at 93 (cnn.com)
- Sad News From NPR: Daniel Schorr, Veteran Newsman and NPR Staple, Dead at 93 (mediaite.com)
- "CBS, NPR Journalist Daniel Schorr Dies at 93" and related posts (tunedin.blogs.time.com)
- Veteran journalist Daniel Schorr dies at 93 (reuters.com)
- Veteran journalist Daniel Schorr dies at 93 (inquisitr.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)